This paper focuses on the research of the protection of great mountains in history. Chinese great mountains have a long history of development, and most of them are still serving as national scenic areas and some of them were even added to the World Heritage List. It is worth studying the cognition and protection in history to find out the reason why these precious natural and cultural heritages can be preserved so well for such a long time. To research the historical protection of Chinese great mountains, the Five Sacred Mountains is the best example and their nature is representative of great mountains in different areas. The research on materials from Pre-Qin Dynasty to Qing Dynasty indicates that the cognition of nature in ancient times is the precondition of the development and protection of the Five Sacred Mountains. This cognition contains ecological consciousness and has developed from the original nature worship to the mixture of natural culture and landscape culture. Each cognition development stage has its own feature on the natural utilization and mountain protection. In this precondition, the specific protection measures are regular national rituals, legal protection of sacred decrees, integrated management system, service base construction based on the "feed mountain by country" principle, and the maintenance and restoration from the government to individuals. Some of the protection measures can only be taken in China such as the "feed mountain by country" principle, and some of the protection measures are only situable for the Five Sacred Mountains such as the regular national rituals. These historical protection measures not only have value for the research of evolution and protection history of Chinese great mountains but also have a good enlightenment on the protection of scenic areas and heritage sites nowadays.
WANG Chao, CHEN Yao-hua
. Research on the historical protection of Chinese great mountains: Taking the Five Sacred Mountains as an example[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011
, 30(2)
: 372
-384
.
DOI: 10.11821/yj2011020016
[1] 谢凝高.中国的名山大川.北京:商务印书馆,1997.
[2] 周维权.山的图腾——名山、名山风景区及其文化内涵.今日国土,2003,(Z2):14~19.
[3] 秦中,张捷,等.四川乐山大佛风化的初步探讨.地理研究,2005,24(6):928~934.
[4] 吴忱,许清海,等.河北省嶂石岩风景区的造景地貌及其演化.地理研究,2002,21(2):195~200.
[5] 任健美,牛俊杰,等.五台山旅游气候及其舒适度评价.地理研究,2004,23(6):856~862.
[6] 王玉涛,郭卫华,刘建,等.昆嵛山自然保护区生态系统服务功能价值评估.生态学报,2009,29(1):523~531.
[7] 丁圣彦,卢训令,等.伏牛山和鸡公山自然保护区植物区系比较 .地理研究,2006,25(1):62~70.
[8] 李燕琴,蔡运龙.北京市生态旅游者的行为特征调查与分析——以百花山自然保护区为例.地理研究,2004,23(6):863~874.
[9] 王子超,王克陵.南朝至唐道教对名山风景的探索与构建——"洞天福地"的自然生态模型理论.华中建筑,2008,26(9):207~210.
[10] 徐学书.西蜀岷山:中华文明的重要发祥地——兼谈岷山历史文化资源的产业价值 .中华文化论坛,2008,(2):140~146.
[11] 梅莉,秦随光.武当山历史地位的变迁.湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,31(6):665~670.
[12] 姚宏,孙根年,等.中国名山旅游地成长理论与实证分析 .山地学报,2008,26(2):237~243.
[13] 武弘麟,程上.名山研究的行为地理学解释——以北雁荡山为例.地理研究,2006,25(6):1107~1114.
[14] 陈耀华,金晓峰.新农村建设背景下风景名胜区与居民点互动关系研究——以方山—长屿硐天国家级风景名胜区入口村庄为例.旅游学刊,2009,24(5):43~47.
[15] 庄优波,杨锐.黄山风景名胜区分区规划研究.中国园林,2006,22(12):32~36.
[16] 胡洋,金笠铭.庐山风景名胜区居民社会问题与整合规划.城市规划,2006,30(10):55~59,插5~插6.
[17] 汪德根,陆林,刘昌雪.改善我国风景名胜区现行管理体制的对策研究——以天柱山风景名胜区为例.旅游学刊,2003,18(3):67~72.
[18] 陈楚文,李萍,范义荣.遗产保护视野下的省域风景名胜区体系规划探索——以浙江省为例.中国园林,2009,25(10):95~98.
[19] 阙维民,谢凝高,陈耀华,等.世界遗产视野中的中国五岳.人文地理,2009,(4):26~30.
[20] 郑霖.论中国名山的分类.山地研究,1998,16(1):21~26.
