This study takes Hainan as a case and its 18 counties as basic unit for analysis. Choosing 3 indexes, including transport network density, proximity and accessibility, this paper constituted the spatial mathematical model to evaluate transport superiority degree firstly. Then, by utilizing GIS and IDW (Inverse Distance Weighted) technology, this paper studied spatial characteristic of transport network in Hainan. Moreover, we selected 4 aspects, i.e., total economic output and industrial structure, population and urbanization, living standards, transportation and the urban construction, 20 indexes all together and uses SPSS16.0 software with principal component analysis to quantitatively evaluate the level of economic development. By analysing spatial characteristic and summarizing spatial disciplinarian, this paper studied the relationship between regional transport superiority and economic performance in Hainan. The results showed that there were great differences in spatial distribution patterns between accessibility and economic development. But the spatial distribution patterns of transport superiority and regional economic performance are coherent, and there are positive relations between them, which showed an opposite spatial arrangement with geographic characteristics in Hainan.
HUANG Xiao-yan, CAO Xiao-shu, LI Tao
. The relationship between regional transport superiority and regional economic performance in Hainan[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2011
, 30(6)
: 985
-999
.
DOI: 10.11821/yj2011060003
[1] 金凤君, 王成金, 李秀伟. 中国区域交通优势的甄别方法及应用分析. 地理学报, 2008, 63(8): 787~798.
[2] Banister D,J Berechman. Transport investment and economic development.USA: UCL Press,2000.33~40.
[3] Aschauer D. Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 1989, 23(2):177~200.
[4] Munnell A. Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment. New England Economic Review, 1990,3(1):3~22.
[5] Garcia-Mila T, McGuire T,Porter R. The effect of public capital in state-level production functions reconsidered. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1996, 78(1):177~180.
[6] Démurger S. Infrastructure development and economic growth: An explanation for regional disparities in China? Journal of Comparative Economics, 2001,29(1):95~117.
[7] Holtz-Eakin D,A Schwartz. Spatial productivity spillovers from public infrastructure: Evidence from state highways. International Tax and Public Finance, 1995,2(3):459~468.
[8] Paez A. Network accessibility and the spatial distribution of economic activity in Eastern Asia. Urban Studies, 2004,41(11):2211~2230.
[9] Rietveld P. Infrastructure and spatial economic development. The Annals of Regional Science, 1995,29(2):117~119.
[10] Vickerman R. The regional impacts of trans-European networks. The Annals of Regional Science, 1995,29(2):237~254.
[11] Vickerman R. Location, accessibility and regional development: The appraisal of trans-European networks. Transport Policy, 1995,2(4):225~234.
[12] Gutiérrez J,P Urbano. Accessibility in the European Union: The impact of the trans-European road network. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996,4(1):15~25.
[13] Holl A. Twenty years of accessibility improvements. The case of the Spanish motorway building programme. Journal of Transport Geography, 2007,15(4):286~297.
[14] Gutiérrez J, R Gonzalez,G Gomez. The European high-speed train network: Predicted effects on accessibility patterns. Journal of Transport Geography, 1996,4(4):227~238.
[15] Sasaki K, T Ohashi A Ando. High-speed rail transit impact on regional systems: Does the Shinkansen contribute to dispersion? The Annals of Regional Science, 1997,31(1):77~98.
[16] Dundon-Smith D,R Gibb. The Channel Tunnel and regional economic development. Journal of Transport Geography, 1994,2(3):178~189.
[17] 曹小曙, 阎小培,等. 穗深港巨型城市走廊空间演化研究. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2006.35~40.
[18] 吴威, 曹有挥, 曹卫东,等. 长江三角洲公路网络的可达性空间格局及其演化. 地理学报, 2006, 61(10): 1065~1074.
[19] 刘承良,余瑞林,熊剑平,等.武汉都市圈路网空间通达性分析.地理学报,2009,64(12):1488~1498.
[20] Li J,J Duan. Multi-scale representation of urban spatial morphology based on GIS and spatial syntax. Journal of Central China Normal University(Natural Sciences), 2004,38(3):383~387.
[21] 封志明,刘东,杨艳昭. 中国交通通达度评价:从分县到分省.地理研究, 2009, 28(3): 419~429.
[22] 刘继生, 陈彦光. 交通网络空间结构的分形维数及其测算方法探讨. 地理学报, 1999, 54(5): 471~478.
[23] 曹小曙, 阎小培. 经济发达地区交通网络演化对通达性空间格局的影响: 以广东省东莞市为例. 地理研究, 2003, 22(3):305~312.
[24] 金凤君, 王姣娥. 20 世纪中国铁路网扩展及其空间通达性. 地理学报,2004, 59(2): 293~302.
[25] 韩增林,杨荫凯,张文尝,等. 交通经济带的基础理论及其生命周期模式研究.地理科学,2000, 20(4): 295~300.
[26] 张文尝.工业波沿交通经济带扩散模式研究.地理科学进展,2000,19(4):335~342.
[27] 刘海隆,包安明,陈曦,等. 新疆交通可达性对区域经济的影响分析.地理学报, 2008,63(4):428~436.
[28] 王振波,徐建刚,朱传耿,等. 中国县域可达性区域划分及其与人口分布的关系. 地理学报, 2010, 65 (4): 416-426.
[29] 俞勇军,陆玉麒. 交通投资与经济发展的关系及其区域效应评价方法研究. 人文地理, 2005, 81 (1): 27~31.
[30] 麻清源,马金辉,张超. 基于网络分析的交通网络评价及其与区域经济发展关系研究. 人文地理, 2006, 90(4): 113~116.
[31] 李九全. 陕西省城市竞争力及其通达性比较研究. 地理科学,2008, 28(4): 471~477.
[32] 蒋海兵,徐建刚,祁毅,等.基于时间可达性与伽萨法则的大卖场区位探讨——以上海市中心城区为例. 地理研究,2010,29(06):1056~1068.
[33] 曹小曙,张利敏,薛德升,等.中国城市交通运输发展水平等级差异变动特征.地理学报,2007,62(10):1034~1040.
[34] 李平华, 陆玉麒. 可达性研究的回顾与展望. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(3): 69~78.
[35] 吕韬,曹有挥. "时空接近"空间自相关模型构建及其应用——以长三角区域经济差异分析为例. 地理研究, 2010,29(02):351~360.
