In the era of economic globalization, transnational corporations are the key driving forces of formation, development and evolution of development zones. In the "learning field" of the interaction of a variety of heterogeneous actors, TNCs must establish an effective localized nexus "channels" between local governments and local enterprises in order to achieve its globalization and localization strategy. First of all, "policy-channel" provides the most basic "channel" protection for TNCs, and becomes the first motivation of TNCs entering development zones. Secondly, the agglomeration-associated becomes the main type of TNCs in the development zones through the expansion of economic and social relations of technology, market and other aspects of "associated-channel". Finally, "value-chain-channel" will contribute to the fusion between the global forces and local forces. Therefore, to a large extent, the localized networking process of TNCs in the development zones is the evolutionary process of "policy-channel", "associated-channel" and "value-chain-channel". Seen from a perspective of evolution mechanism, the localized networking of TNCs is characterized by the "reverse" feature of "geographical proximity-relational proximity-institutional proximity" mechanism. In the combination of proximity mechanisms, the "heterogeneous channel networks" comprising " policy-channel", "associated-channel" and "value-chain-channel" play a crucial role in the localized networking process of TNCs.
[1] O’Brien R. Global financial integration:The end of geography. London:Royal Institute of International Affairs,1992.
[2] 李小建,等. 经济地理学. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006. 371~399.
[3] 杨友仁,夏铸九. 跨界生产网络的在地化聚集与组织治理模式:以大苏州地区信息电子业台商为例. 地理学报,2004,43(36):23~54.
[4] 杨友仁,夏铸九. 跨界生产网络之在地镶嵌与地方性制度之演化:以大东莞地区为例. 都市与计划,2005,32(3):275~299.
[5] 王缉慈,罗家德,童昕. 东莞和苏州的台商PC产业群的比较分析. 中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2003,3(2):6~10.
[6] Nachum L, Keeble K. Foreign and indigenous firms in the media clusters of central London. ESRC Centre of Business Research,University of Cambridge Working Paper No.154,2000.
[7] Yu Zhou,Xin Tong. An innovative region in china:Interaction between multinational corporations and local firms in a high-tech cluster in Beijing. Economic Geography,2003,79(2):129~140.
[8] Miao Changhong,Wei Yehua Dennis, Ma Haitao. Technological learning and innovation in China in the context of globalization. Eurasian Geography and Economics,2007,48(6):1~20.
[9] 苗长虹,艾少伟. "学习场"结构与空间中的创新. 经济地理,2009,29(7):1057~1063.
[10] 苗长虹,魏也华. 技术学习与创新:经济地理学的视角. 人文地理,2007,22(5):1~9.
[11] 艾少伟. 中国开发区技术学习通道研究——以苏州工业园区为例. 开封:河南大学博士学位论文,2009. 32~88.
[12] 张杰,刘志彪. 制度约束、全球价值链嵌入与我国地方产业集群升级. 当代财经,2008,28(9):84~91.
[13] Dixit A K, Stiglitz J E. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review,1977(67):297~308.
[14] Krugman P. Space:The final frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives,1998(12):161~174.
[15] Krugman P. History and industry location:The case of the manufacturing belt. American Economic Review,1991,81(2):80~83.
[16] 苗长虹,崔立华.产业集聚:地理学与经济学主流观点的对比. 人文地理,2003,18(3):42~46.
[17] Julan Du,Yi Lu,Zhigang Tao. FDI location choice:Agglomeration VS institutions. International Journal of Finance & Economics,2007,13(1):92~107.
[18] 周振华. 产业关联深化的新变化、基础及其结构平衡. 东南学术,2005,18(1):76~81.
[19] 王焕祥,陆妙燕. 从基础性优势到集聚性优势:东道国吸引跨国公司FDI的二重优势研究. 财贸研究,2005,(2):6~12.
[20] Dyer,Jeffrey H, Nile Hatch. Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers:Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal,2006,(27):701~719.
[21] Hamel G, Prahalad C K. Strategic intent. Harvard Business Review,1989,67(5-6):63~76.
[22] 张彦博,郭亚军,韩颖. 跨国公司的群居机制与落后地区的引资政策. 数量经济技术经济研究,2007,24(2):115~123.
[23] 任胜钢. 基于跨国公司视角的集群研究新进展. 外国经济与管理,2004,26(l):17~21.
[24] Skvoretz J T,Fararo J, Agneessens F. Advances in biased net theory:Definitions,derivations,and estimations. Social Networks,2004,(26):113~139.
[25] 茹玉骢. FDI的形成与演进. 浙江学刊,2005,(3):179~185.
[26] 李锋,赵曙东,史小庆,等. 开放条件下江苏产业集聚现状与形成机制研究. 世界经济与政治论坛,2005,25(4):69~72.
[27] 梁启华,高毅蓉. 跨国公司的技术关联性对产业集聚的影响机理. 研究与发展管理,2006,18(4):39~46.
[28] 王剑. 基于聚集经济的FDI区位选择研究. 南京:东南大学博士学位论文,2006. 20~25.
[29] 洗国明,葛顺奇. 促进关联:东道国外资竞争政策新趋势. 国际经济合作,2002,(1):7.
[30] Bair J, Gereffi G. Local clusters in global chains:The cases and consequences of export dynamism in Torreon’s blue jeans industry. World Development,2001,29(11):1885~1903.
[31] Dicken P,Malmberg A. Firms in territory:A relational perspective. Economic Geography,2001,77(4): 345~363.
[32] Henderson J,Dicken P,Coe N M, et al. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy,2002,9(3):436~464.
[33] 薛求知,任胜钢. 跨国公司理论新进展:基于区位与集群的视角. 复旦学报(社会科学版),2005,(1):63~71.
[34] Rugman Alan M, Verbeke A. Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise:Internalization and strategic management perspectives. Journal of International Business Studies,2003,34(2):125~137.
[35] 黎继子,刘春玲,蔡根女. 全球价值链与中国地方产业集群的供应链式整合. 中国工业经济,2005,22(2):118~125.
[36] McCann Philip, Mudambi Ram. The location behavior of the multinational enterprise:Some analytical issues. Growth and Change,2004,35(4):491~524.
[37] Ernst D,Linsu Kim. Global production network,knowledge diffusion,local capability formation. Research Policy,2002,31(8-9):1417~1429.
[38] 杨友仁,夏铸九. 跨界生产网络的组织治理模式. 地理研究,2005,24(2):253~264.
[39] Torre A, Rallet A. Proximity and localization. Regional Studies,2005,39(1):47~59.
[40] Boschma R A. Proximity and innovation:A critical assessment. Regional Studies,2005,39(1):61~74.
[41] 任胜钢. 苏州产业集群与跨国公司互动关系的实证分析. 中国软科学,2005,20(1):99~106.
