EN中文

GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH >

2025 , Vol. 44 >Issue 7: 1733 - 1754

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj020250562

Opinions and Debates

Transport geography: An interdisciplinary and cross-continent dialogue

  • WANG Jiaoe , 1 ,
  • Xinyu (Jason) CAO 2 ,
  • CAO Weidong 3 ,
  • Chia-Lin CHEN 4 ,
  • Frédéric DOBRUSZKES 5 ,
  • César DUCRUET 6 ,
  • FU Xiao 7 ,
  • Andrew R. GOETZ 8 ,
  • GUO Jianke 9 ,
  • HUANG Jie 1 ,
  • LI Yuanjun 10 ,
  • Becky P. Y. LOO 11 ,
  • Tim SCHWANEN 12 ,
  • WANG Lei 13 ,
  • YANG Dong 14 ,
  • Anming ZHANG 15 ,
  • ZONG Huiming 16 ,
  • WU Qitao , 10
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2. Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA;
  • 3. School of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China
  • 4. Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK
  • 5. Université libre de Bruxelles, Département Géosciences, Environnement et Société; Brussels 1050, Belgium
  • 6. French National Centre for Scientific Research, Paris 75006, France
  • 7. School of Geography, NanJing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • 8. Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Denver, Denver 80208, USA;
  • 9. Institute of Marine Sustainable Development, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China;
  • 10. Guangzhou Institute of Geography, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China;
  • 11. Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
  • 12. School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK
  • 13. Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
  • 14. Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China
  • 15. Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z2, Canada
  • 16. School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Received date: 2025-05-13

  Accepted date: 2025-06-22

  Online published: 2025-07-17

Fold

Abstract

Transport geography focuses on the interactions between transportation systems and geographical spaces, as well as their impacts on socioeconomic development and environmental change. In recent years, the scope and focus of transport geography have continued to expand, and new changes have taken place in its research paradigm. To promote the innovative development of transport geography, this article builds upon the discipline's connotations, characteristics and research frontiers. It conducts an interdisciplinary dialogue around four thematic sessions: Theory, Sector, Interdiscipline and Prospect. (1) The Theory session proposes that the localization and globalization of the theories and concepts of transport geography, as well as the transformation of research objects and paradigms, have become the key focuses of scholars' future research. (2) The Sector session puts forward that air transportation, maritime shipping, logistics activities and road transportation have different roles and functions for the development of transport geography. (3) The Interdiscipline session suggests that transport geography is closely related to disciplines such as spatial planning, computer science, sociology and GIS, and has the potential for interdisciplinary research. (4) The Prospect session points out the direction of transport geography in the future from the dimensions of low-altitude transportation, new transportation models, mobility and disciplinary frontiers.

Key words： transport geography; spatial planning; mobility; sustainability; new technology; interdiscipline

Cite this article

WANG Jiaoe , Xinyu (Jason) CAO , CAO Weidong , Chia-Lin CHEN , Frédéric DOBRUSZKES , César DUCRUET , FU Xiao , Andrew R. GOETZ , GUO Jianke , HUANG Jie , LI Yuanjun , Becky P. Y. LOO , Tim SCHWANEN , WANG Lei , YANG Dong , Anming ZHANG , ZONG Huiming , WU Qitao . Transport geography: An interdisciplinary and cross-continent dialogue[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2025 , 44(7) : 1733 -1754 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020250562

衷心感谢匿名评审专家和编辑在论文审阅中所付出的时间和精力，专家在观点提炼、文字表达等方面的修改意见，使本文获益匪浅。

References

Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within
[1]
Goetz A R, Vowles T M, Tierney S. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide in transport geography. The Professional Geographer, 2009, 61(3): 323-335.

[2]
Sheller M. Automotive emotions: Feeling the car. Theory, Culture & Society, 2004, 21(4-5): 221-242.

[3]
Urry J. The “system” of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 2004, 21(4-5): 25-39.

[4]
Wang D G, Chai Y W. The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Beijing, China: The legacy of Danwei. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009, 17(1): 30-38.

[5]
Liu Q Y. The dilemmas of transport equity research in non-Western contexts. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2024, 26: 101157.

[6]
Robinson J. Comparative Urbanism: Tactics for Global Urban Studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2022:369.

[7]
Yeung H W. Method in relational-explanatory geography. Progress in Human Geography, 2024, 48(4): 391-420.

[8]
Hay A. Transport geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1977, 1(2): 313-318.

[9]
Hay A. Transport geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1978, 2(2): 324-329.

[10]
Hay A. Transport geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1979, 3(2): 267-272.

[11]
Hay A. Transport geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1980, 4(2): 271-275.

[12]
Hay A. Transport geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1981, 5(2): 263-267.

[13]
Rimmer P. Transport geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1985, 9(2): 271-277.

[14]
Rimmer P. Transport geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1986, 10(3): 397-406.

[15]
Rimmer P. Transport geography. Progress in Human Geography, 1988, 12(2): 270-281.

[16]
Schwanen T. Geographies of transport I: Reinventing a field? Progress in Human Geography, 2016, 40(1): 126-137.

[17]
Schwanen T. Geographies of transport II: Reconciling the general and the particular. Progress in Human Geography, 2017, 41(3): 355-364.

[18]
Schwanen T. Geographies of transport III: New spatialities of knowledge production. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(3): 463-472.

[19]
Loo B P Y, Axhausen K W. Getting out of energy-intensive and “dirty” transport for sustainable societies. The Innovation, 2022, 3(6): 100339.

[20]
Loo B P Y. Walking towards a happy city. Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 93: 103078.

[21]
Loo B P Y, Lam W W Y. Geographic accessibility around elderly health care facilities in Hong Kong: A micro-scale walkability assessment. Environment and Planning B-Planning and Design, 2012, 39(4): 629-646.

[22]
Ann F. What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Design International, 2015, 20(4): 274-292.

[23]
Li L N, Loo B P Y. Towards people-centered integrated transport: A case study of Shanghai Hongqiao Comprehensive Transport Hub. Cities, 2016, 58: 50-58.

[24]
Wang B, Loo B P Y, Li L. Situating high-speed railway stations within local urban contexts: Passenger satisfaction with intermodal integration at the Hong Kong HSR station. Built Environment, 2020, 46(3): 362-378.

[25]
Preston J. Integration for Seamless Transport. International Transport Forum. (2012-05-2)[2025-04-25]. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/dp201201.pdf.

[26]
Liu X Z, Chen W D, Chen X W, et al. Could free-floating bikeshare weed out station-based bikeshare? Analyzing the relationship between two bikeshare systems from bivariate flow clustering. Journal of Transport Geography, 2024, 118: 103941.

[27]
Zhang Y, Chen X J, Gao S, et al. Integrating smart card records and dockless bike-sharing data to understand the effect of the built environment on cycling as a feeder mode for metro trips. Journal of Transport Geography, 2024, 121: 103995.

[28]
Cheung T K Y, Wong C W H, Zhang A M. The evolution of aviation network: Global airport connectivity index 2006-2016. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2020, 133: 101826.

[29]
Wong C W, Cheung T K Y, Zhang A M. A connectivity-based methodology for new air route identification. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2023, 173: 103715.

[30]
Wandelt S, Sun X Q, Zhang A M. Towards analyzing the robustness of the integrated global transportation network abstraction (IGTNA). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2023, 178: 103838.

[31]
Wandelt S, Zhang A M, Sun X Q. Global Airport Resilience Index: Towards a comprehensive understanding of air transportation resilience. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2025, 138: 104522.

[32]
Zhou Z Y, Zhang A M. Transportation infrastructure and industrial upgrading: Evidence from high-speed rail. (2024-05-13)[2025-04-13].http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4825822.

[33]
Dong X F, Zheng S Q, Kahn M E. The role of transportation speed in facilitating high skilled teamwork across cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 2020, 115: 103212.

[34]
Wang J T, Cai S Y. The construction of high-speed railway and urban innovation capacity: Based on the perspective of knowledge spillover. China Economic Review, 2020, 63: 101539.

[35]
Wang Y M, Cao G H, Yan Y L, et al. Does high-speed rail stimulate cross-city technological innovation collaboration? Evidence from China. Transport Policy, 2022, 116: 119-131.

[36]
Hanley D, Li J C, Wu M Q. High-speed railways and collaborative innovation. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2022, 93: 103717.

[37]
Miwa N, Bhatt A, Morikawa S, et al. High-speed rail and the knowledge economy: Evidence from Japan. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2022, 159: 398-416.

[38]
Ullman E L. Mapping the world's ocean trade: A research proposal. The Professional Geographer, 1949, 1(2): 19-22.

[39]
Gourou P. Le port d'Anvers. Annales de Géographie, 1942, 51(286): 150.

[40]
Gottmann J. Baltimore: Un grand port industriel. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 1951, 42: 360-366.

[41]
Siegfried A. Suez, Panama et Les Routes Maritimes Mondiales. Paris: Armand Colin, 1940: 33.

[42]
Chardonnet J. Atlas International Larousse, Politique et Économique, Foreword by André Siegfried, from the Académie Française. Paris: Larousse, 1950: 4, 41, 42.

[43]
Slack B. Pawns in the game: Ports in a global transportation system. Growth and Change, 1993, 24(4): 579-588.

[44]
Ng A K Y, Ducruet C. The changing tides of port geography (1950-2012). Progress in Human Geography, 2014, 38(6): 785-823.

[45]
Ducruet C, Notteboom T. Port Systems in Global Competition: Spatial-Economic Perspectives on the Co-Development of Seaports. London: Routledge, 2023: 13-54, 300-333.

[46]
Li Y J, Wu Q T, Li Y T, et al. Estimation of expressway carbon emissions and simulation of policies based on OTC data: A case study of Guangdong, China. Urban Climate, 2024, 55: 101908.

[47]
陈卓, 金凤君, 王姣娥. 基于高速公路流的东北大都市区边界识别与结构特征研究. 地理科学, 2019, 39(6): 929-937.

DOI

[Chen Zhuo, Jin Fengjun, Wang Jiaoe. Spatial boundaries and structural characteristics of metropolitan areas in Northeast China: A study using the data of expressway flows. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(6): 929-937.]

DOI

[48]
李苑君, 吴旗韬, 金双泉, 等. 基于联网收费大数据的广东省高速公路交通流时空格局与形成机理. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(11): 2113-2125.

DOI

[Li Yuanjun, Wu Qitao, Jin Shuangquan, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern and formation mechanism of expressway traffic flows in Guangdong Province based on the online toll collection data. Progress in Geography, 2023, 42(11): 2113-2125.]

DOI

[49]
李苑君, 吴旗韬, 张玉玲, 等. “流空间” 视角下高速公路交通流网络结构特征及其形成机制: 以广东省为例. 地理研究, 2021, 40(8): 2204-2219.

DOI

[Li Yuanjun, Wu Qitao, Zhang Yuling, et al. Spatial structure and formation mechanism of expressway traffic flow network based on space of flows: A case study of Guangdong Province. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(8): 2204-2219.]

[50]
Friedmann J. Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987: 225.

[51]
Hall P. Visions of contemporary planning: Stories and journeys in Britain and America// Haselsberger B. Encounters in Planning Thought. London: Routledge, 2017: 51-70.

[52]
Haselsberger B. Encounters in Planning Thought. London: Routledge, 2017: 3.

[53]
Albrechts L. Strategic planning as a catalyst for transformative practice//Haselsberger B. Encounters in Planning Thought. London: Routledge, 2017: 184-201.

[54]
Friedmann J. The Good Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982: 56.

[55]
Campbell H, Marshall R. Towards justice in planning: A reappraisal. European Planning Studies, 2006, 14(2): 239-252.

[56]
Yamagata Y, Yang P J P, Chang S, et al. Urban Systems Design-Creating Sustainable Smart Cities in the Internet of Things Era. London: Elsevier, 2020: 23-58.

[57]
Kitchin R. Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 2014, 1(1): 1-12.

[58]
Knieling J, Othengrafen F. Planning culture: A concept to explain the evolution of planning policies and processes in Europe. European Planning Studies, 2015, 23: 11, 2133-2147

[59]
Cao J, Tao T. Using machine-learning models to understand nonlinear relationships between land use and travel. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2023, 123: 103930.

[60]
Ding C, Cao X Y, Næss P. Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 110: 107-117.

[61]
Tao T, Wu X Y, Cao J, et al. Exploring the nonlinear relationship between the built environment and active travel in the twin cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2023, 43(3): 637-652.

[62]
Cao J, Tao T. Can an identified environmental correlate of car ownership serve as a practical planning tool? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2025, 191: 104304.

[63]
金凤君, 陈卓. 1978年改革开放以来中国交通地理格局演变与规律. 地理学报, 2019, 74(10): 1941-1961.

DOI

[Jin Fengjun, Chen Zhuo. Evolution of transportation in China since reform and opening-up: Patterns and principles. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(10): 1941-1961 ]

DOI

[64]
赵鹏军, 万婕. 城市交通与土地利用一体化模型的核心算法进展及技术创新. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(4): 792-804.

DOI

[Zhao Pengjun, Wan Jie. The development and innovation of the core algorithm of the integrated model of urban transport and land use. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2020, 22(4): 792-804.]

[65]
王姣娥, 焦敬娟, 黄洁, 等. 交通发展区位测度的理论与方法. 地理学报, 2018, 73(4): 666-676.

DOI

[Wang Jiaoe, Jiao Jingjuan, Huang Jie, et al. Theory and methodology of transportation development and location measures. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(4): 666-676.]

DOI

[66]
王姣娥, 陈娱, 戴特奇, 等. 中国交通地理学的传承发展与创新. 经济地理, 2021, 41(10): 59-69.

DOI

[Wang Jiaoe, Chen Yu, Dai Teqi, et al. Inheritance, development and innovation of transport geography in China. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(10): 59-69.]

[67]
曹有挥, 梁双波, 吴威, 等. 枢纽港口城市港航服务业空间组织机理: 以上海市为例. 地理学报, 2017, 72(12): 2226-2240.

DOI

[Cao Youhui, Liang Shuangbo, Wu Wei, et al. Spatial organizational mechanism of port and shipping service industry in a hub port city: A case study of Shanghai. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(12): 2226-2240.]

DOI

[68]
Givoni M. Development and impact of the modern high-speed train: A review. Transport Reviews, 2006, 26(5): 593-611.

[69]
Wang J E, Jin F J, Mo H H, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of China's railway network in the 20th century: An accessibility approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2009, 43(8): 765-778.

[70]
Wang J J, Xu J, He J F. Spatial impacts of high-speed railways in China: A total-travel-time approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2013, 45(9): 2261-2280.

[71]
吴旗韬, 张虹鸥, 孙威, 等. 基于矢量-栅格集成法的厦深高铁影响空间分布: 以广东东部地区为例. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(6): 707-715.

DOI

[Wu Qitao, Zhang Hongou, Sun Wei, et al. Influence of the Xiamen-Shenzhen high-speed railways on accessibility and regional development: A case study of eastern Guangdong Province. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(6): 707-715.]

DOI

[72]
Wang L, Duan X J. High-speed rail network development and winner and loser cities in megaregions: The case study of Yangtze River Delta, China. Cities, 2018, 83: 71-82.

[73]
Jiao J J, Wang J E, Zhang F N, et al. Roles of accessibility, connectivity and spatial interdependence in realizing the economic impact of high-speed rail: Evidence from China. Transport Policy, 2020, 91: 1-15.

[74]
Huang Y, Zong H M. Has high-speed railway promoted spatial equity at different levels? A case study of inland mountainous area of China. Cities, 2021, 110: 103076.

[75]
Zheng W, Wei S. A “node-place-network-city” framework to examine HSR station area development dynamics: Station typologies and development strategies. Journal of Transport Geography, 2024, 120: 103993.

[76]
Wang L, Zheng W, He S W, et al. Assessing urban vitality and its determinants in high-speed rail station areas in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2022, 15(1): 333-354.

[77]
廖小罕, 张捷, 黄耀欢. 浅析低空地理学的特征及其对地理学的拓展. 地理学报, 2024, 79(3): 551-564.

DOI

[Liao Xiaohan, Zhang Jie, Huang Yaohuan. Views on characters of low-altitude airspace geography and its impact on the geography development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2024, 79(3): 551-564.]

DOI

[78]
黄洁, 王姣娥. 交通大数据在人文与经济地理学的应用及学科影响. 地球信息科学学报, 2020, 22(6): 1180-1188.

DOI

[Huang Jie, Wang Jiaoe. Applications and influence of transport big data in human and economic geography. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 2020, 22(6): 1180-1188.]

[79]
王德, 李丹, 傅英姿. 基于手机信令数据的上海市不同住宅区居民就业空间研究. 地理学报, 2020, 75(8): 1585-1602.

DOI

[Wang De, Li Dan, Fu Yingzi. Employment space of residential quarters in Shanghai: An exploration based on mobile signaling data. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020, 75(8): 1585-1602.]

DOI

[80]
王姣娥, 黄洁. 交通-区域发展交互的理论创新与实践应用. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(2): 177-186.

DOI

[Wang Jiaoe, Huang Jie. Theoretical innovation and practical application of transportation-region development interactions. Advances in Earth Science, 2022, 37(2): 177-186.]

DOI

Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉