Urban and Rural Studies

The local response of transnational social space under globalization in urban China: A case study of African enclave in Guangzhou

Expand
  • Center for Urban &|Regional Studies, SUN Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Received date: 2008-11-14

  Revised date: 2009-01-16

  Online published: 2009-07-25

Supported by

国家自然科学基金资助项目(40601033, 40771066,40771067);广东省自然科学基金资助项目 (06300105);中山大学"百人计划"资助项目(3171310);教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目。

Abstract

After a successful market reform featured by opening-up, urban China is facing a tremendous sociospatial restructuring in recent years. The rise of a new type of social space, i.e., ethnic enclaves has been remarkable. Taking Xiaobei of Guangzhou City as a study case, this paper examines the response of local residents and communities. Method of triangulation is mainly used, along with both quantitative analysis such as questionnaire and logistics regression and qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews, focus group and so on. As shown by the empirical study, a negative representation of African communities has been constructed in Guangzhou. Attitudes of local residents surveyed upon African enclaves do not show a consistent result of either acceptance or exclusion. Through a logistic regression, it is found that in terms of the variables of age, gender, educational attainments, the length of living time or religions, no variables can stand out to be significant. Employment, however, is important, while traders, workers or those involved in service sectors mainly put a positive attitude towards Africans, in contrast to professionals, self-employed or students. Moreover, interviews of traders in Xiaobei further disclose that interactions between local residents and Africans are an important determinant of the relations, which, however, are purely economic-based rather than cultural or social based. According to a study of local media reports and website, it is found that the local state-owned newspapers produce a negative impact upon the representation of African enclaves. Critical comments upon criminal cases of African immigrants already engender an invisible wall between local residents and African communities. Based on the sprawl of information on the net, such negative attitudes towards African immigrants soared. Therefore, this indicates a transition of Xiaobei from initiative concentration of African traders to negative segregation. The future of such African communities is under question.

Cite this article

LI Zhi-gang, XU De-sheng, DU Feng, ZHU Ying . The local response of transnational social space under globalization in urban China: A case study of African enclave in Guangzhou[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009 , 28(4) : 920 -932 . DOI: 10.11821/yj2009040007

References


[1] Cha A E. Chasing the Chinese Dream, in Washington Post, 2007.

[2] Wu F L, K Webber. The rise of 'foreign gated communities' in Beijing: Between economic globalization and local institutions. Cities, 2004, 21(3): 203~213.

[3] 李志刚, 薛德升, Brown A,等.广州小北路黑人聚居区社会空间分析. 地理学报, 2008, 63(2): 207~218.

[4] Kim H. Ethnic enclave economy in Urban China: The Korean immigrants in Yanbian. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2003, 26(5): 802~828.

[5] Faist T. The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

[6] Pries L. New Transnational Social Spaces: International Migration and Transnational Companies in the Early Twenties-first Century. New York: Routledge,2001.

[7] Zhou M, J Logan. Returns on human capital in ethnic enclaves: New York's Chinatown. American Sociological Review, 1989,54: 809~820.

[8] Davis C P, Beyond Miami: The ethnic enclave and personal income in various Cuban communities in the United States. International Migration Review, 2004,38(2): 450~469.

[9] Abramson D, L Manzo, J Hou. From ethnic enclave to multi-ethnic translocal community: Contested identities and urban design in Seattle's Chinatown-International District. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2006,23(4): 341~360.

[10] Portes A. Globalization from Below: The rise of transnational communities. Latin America in the World Economy, ed.Smith W P, Korczenwicz R P. Westport: Greenwood Press,1996.

[11] Guarnizo L E, Smith M P. The Locations of Transnationalism, in Transnationalism from Below, Smith M P, Guarnizo L E, ed. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers,1998. 3~34.

[12] Kivisto P. Social spaces, transnational immigrant communities, and the politics of incorporation. Ethnicities, 2003,3(1): 6~28.

[13] Beaverstock J V. Transnational elites in global cities: British expatriates in Singapore's financial district. Geoforum, 2002,33(4): 525~538.

[14] Ley D. Transnational spaces and everyday lives. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2004, 29: 151~164.

[15] Waldinger R, Fitzgerald D. Transnationalism in Question. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, 109(5): 1177~95.

[16] Portes A, L Guarnizo, P Landolt, Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaptation. American Sociological Review, 2002,67: 278~298.

[17] Smith R. Mexican New York: Transnational Lives of New Immigrants. Berkeley: University of California Press,2006.

[18] Morawska E. Transnationalism. Harvard Encyclopedia of the New Americans, 2007: 149~163.

[19] Smith M, P Guarnizo. Transnationalism from below. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.,1998.

[20] Itzigsohn J, et al. Mapping Dominican transnationalism: narrow and broad transnational practices. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1999,22: 316~39.

[21] Chan S. Chinese American Transnationalism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press,2006.

[22] Guarnizo. The Economics of Transnational Living. International Migration Review, 2003,37: 666~699.

[23] Levitt. The Transnational Villagers. Berkeley: University California Press,2001.

[24] Yeoh B, K Willis, S Fakhri. Introduction: Transnationalism and its edges. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2003,26(2): 207~217.

[25] Fox J. Unpacking transnational citizenship'. Annual Review of Political Science, 2005,8: 171~201.

[26] Levitt P, B N Jaworsky. Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 2007,33: 129~156.

[27] Portes A. The social origins of the Cuban enclave economy of Miami. Sociological Perspectives, 1987,30: 340~372.

[28] Portes A. Conclusion: theoretical convergences and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. International Migrant Review, 2003,37: 974~992.

[29] Zhou M. New York's China Town: The Socioeconomic Potential of an Urban Enclave. Philadelphia: Temple University Press,1992.

[30] Zhou M, J Logan. In and out of Chinatown: Residential mobility and segregation of New York's Chinese. Social Forces, 1991,70(2): 387~407.

[31] Sassen S. Guests and Aliens. New York: New Press,1999.

[32] Smith P. Transnational Urbanism. Malden: Blackwell, 2001.

[33] 戴春. 社会融入:上海国际化社区建构. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2007.

[34] 许学强,等. 广州市社会空间结构的因子生态分析. 地理学报, 1989,44(4): 386~395.

[35] 郑静,等. 广州市社会空间的因子生态再分析. 地理学报,1995, 14(2): 15~26.

[36] 顾朝林, C. 克斯特罗德. 北京社会空间极化与空间分异研究. 地理学报, 1997,52(5): 385~393.

[37] 虞蔚. 城市社会空间结构的研究与预测. 城市规划, 1986,6: 625~628.

[38] 李志刚, 吴缚龙, 高向东."全球城市"极化与上海社会空间分异研究. 地理科学, 2007,27(3):304~311.

[39] 魏立华. 社会经济转型期中国城市社会空间演进机制研究——以广州市1990-2000为例, 城市与区域规划系.广州:中山大学,2005.

[40] 王兴中. 中国城市社会空间结构研究.北京: 科学出版社,2000.

[41] 吴缚龙. 中国的城市化与"新"城市主义. 城市规划, 2006,30(8): 19~23.

[42] 冯建.北京都市区社会空间结构及其演化(1990-2000). 地理研究, 2003,22(4): 465~483.

[43] 李志刚, 吴缚龙.转型期上海社会空间分异研究. 地理学报, 2006,61(2): 199~211.

[44] 柴彦威. 以单位为基础的中国城市内部生活空间结构研究——兰州市的实证研究. 地理研究, 1996,15(1): 30~38.

[45] 刘玉亭, 吴缚龙, 何深静,李志刚.转型期城市低收入邻里的类型、特征和机制. 地理研究,2006,25(6):1073~1082.

[46] Huang Y. From work-unit compounds to gated communities: Housing inequality and residential segregation in transitional Beijing, in Restructuring the Chinese city: Changing society, economy and space. Ma L J C,Wu F, ed.London and New York: Routledge,2005.

[47] Huang Y, S M Low. Is gating always exclusionary? A comparative analysis of gated communities in American and Chinese cities. in Urban China Transformation. Logan J. Editor. Blackwell: Oxford,2008.

[48] 魏立华, 闫小培."城中村":存续前提下的转型——兼论"城中村"改造的可行性模式.城市规划,2005,29(7):9~13.

[49] 魏立华, 闫小培, 中国经济发达地区城市非正式移民聚居区—"城中村"的形成与演进——以珠江三角洲诸城市为例. 管理世界, 2005,8: 48~56.

[50] 冯健, 王永海.中关村高校周边居住区社会空间特征及其形成机制. 地理研究, 2008,27(5): 1003~1016.

[51] 周尚意, 朱立艾, 范芝芬. 城市交通干线发展对少数民族社区演变的影响——以北京马甸回族社区为例. 北京社会科学, 2002,(4): 33~39.

[52] Denzin N K. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,1989.

[53] McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge , 2001.

[54] Brenner N.New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press,2004.

[55] Swynegdouw E. Neither global nor local: 'glocalization' and the politics of scale, in Spaces of globalization: reasserting the power of the local. Cox K, ed.London: Guildford Press,1997. 138~166.

[56] Jessop B, N L Sum. An entrepreneurial city in action: Emerging strategies for (inter-)urban competition in Hong Kong. The future of Chinese cities: A research agenda for the 21st century, 28th-31st July, 1999.

[57] Wu F. The global and local dimensions of place-making: Remaking Shanghai as a world city. Urban Studies, 2000,37(8): 1359~1377.

[58] Wu F.Place promotion in Shanghai, PRC. Cities, 2000,17(5): 349~361.

[59] 中国对外经济贸易年鉴编辑委员会编. 2007中国外经贸统计年鉴.北京: 中国经济出版社,2008.

Outlines

/