地理研究

地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 370-383.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190060

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于汽车产业供应链体系的中国城市网络特征研究

陈肖飞1, 杨洁辉2, 王恩儒3, 苗长虹1()   

  1. 1. 河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心暨黄河文明省部共建协同创新中心,开封 475001
    2. 河南大学现代物流研究院,开封 475001
    3. 北达科他大学地理与地理信息科学系, ND58202, 美国
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-18 修回日期:2019-05-16 出版日期:2020-02-20 发布日期:2020-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 苗长虹
  • 作者简介:陈肖飞（1986- ）,男,河南三门峡人,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为产业集群与区域发展。E-mail: chenfei_niglas@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41901149);国家自然科学基金项目(41430637);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(19YJC630202);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2017M622332)

The characteristics of China's urban network based on the supply chain system of automobile industry

CHEN Xiaofei1, YANG Jiehui2, WANG Enru3, MIAO Changhong1()   

  1. 1. Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development & Yellow River Civilization by Provincial and Ministerial Co-construction of Collaborative Innovation Center, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China
    2. Institute of Modern Logistics, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China
    3. Department of Geography & GISc, University of North Dakota, ND 58202, USA;
  • Received:2019-01-18 Revised:2019-05-16 Online:2020-02-20 Published:2020-05-20
  • Contact: MIAO Changhong

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

摘要：

结构特征与权力等级是城市网络的重要要素。基于“产业-区位”视角,通过对2012年中国汽车产业供应链体系分析,凝炼中国城市网络特征。研究发现：① 基于汽车产业供应链体系的中国城市网络表现出明显的“低密度-多核心、高聚类-少趋同”的结构特征。② 城市网络的结构特征与权力等级存在显著“悖论”,即城市节点的网络地位不仅取决于链接城市的数量,还需考虑关联网络的空间属性和资本容量。③ 城市网络权力等级中既包括上海、重庆等领导核心城市,也包括广州、芜湖等中心集约城市和苏州、成都等权力门户城市,说明转变中心性与转变控制力不仅能有效揭示中国城市网络节点的真实权力属性,也更符合经济现象的地理空间非均衡规律。④ 重庆、上海、天津、长春、北京、十堰等领导核心城市并未完全锁定中国六大汽车产业集聚区,其中长三角地区网络权力最突出,珠三角地区网络权力最弱。

关键词: 汽车产业, 供应链体系, 转变中心性, 转变控制力, 中国城市网络

Abstract:

Structural characteristics and power hierarchy are important elements of urban networks. This paper studied the selection of China's automobile industry supply chain system in 2012 by using "China automobile industry enterprise information Daquan", "China industrial enterprise database" and "China automobile supplier network", and analyzed the characteristics of China's urban network from the perspective of "industry-location". The results showed that: Firstly, based on the supply chain system of automobile industry, China's urban network showed obvious structural characteristics of "low density, multi-core, high clustering, less convergence". Secondly, there existed a "paradox" between the structural characteristics and power levels of cities in the urban network, which means that the network status depended not only on the number of linked cities, but also on the spatial attributes and capital capacity of the associated networks. Thirdly, the urban network power level included not only the leading core cities such as Shanghai and Chongqing, but also the central intensive cities such as Guangzhou and Wuhu, and the power gateway cities such as Suzhou and Chengdu. The result suggested that the "alter-based centrality" and "alter-based power" could not only effectively reveal the real power attribute of China's urban network nodes, but also kept more in line with the unbalanced law of geographical space of economic phenomena. Fourth, leading core cities, including Chongqing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Changchun, Beijing, Shiyan, etc., did not completely take over the six major automotive agglomerations in China, among which Yangtze River Delta region was at the highest level in the power hierarchy whereas the Pearl River Delta region was at the bottom. Finally, it should be noted that the supply chain system of automobile industry was only a special situation between "urban agents", and its research conclusions could not be infinitely copied and promoted, and could not replace the relevant conclusions of other factor flows.

Key words: automobile industry, supply chain system, alter-based centrality, alter-based power, China's urban network