地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 527-538.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190168

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

全球跨境并购网络结构及其演变特征

计启迪1,2, 陈伟1,2, 刘卫东1,2()   

  1. 1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
    2. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-06 修回日期:2019-06-27 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-05-20
  • 通讯作者: 刘卫东
  • 作者简介:计启迪(1995-),女,浙江长兴人,博士研究生,主要从事经济地理与区域发展研究。E-mail: jiqd.17b@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41530751)

Structure and evolution of global cross-border M&A network

JI Qidi1,2, CHEN Wei1,2, LIU Weidong1,2()   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
    2. School of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2019-03-06 Revised:2019-06-27 Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-05-20
  • Contact: LIU Weidong

摘要:

跨境并购是跨国公司实现全球化发展战略的重要方式。利用Zephyr全球并购数据库,本文通过构建1997—2017年的全球跨境并购网络,分析全球跨境并购网络的拓扑特征及结构演变,主要结论如下:① 自20世纪90年代以来,全球跨境并购波动发展,网络拓扑指标呈现阶段性,其中2008年全球金融危机是跨境并购发展的重要转折点。② 全球跨境并购网络具有显著的小世界特征,服从无标度分布;并购方的“富人俱乐部”现象比被并购方更为明显,但随着全球经济一体化进程逐渐减弱。③ 全球跨境并购网络呈现出“核心-边缘”式结构,非洲、南美洲和亚洲部分地区长期处于边缘地带;但2008年全球金融危机以来,北美与西欧双核主导向“全球三极”主导模式演变,东亚及东南亚国家(地区)逐渐发展成为第三大核心。④ 世界各国(地区)在全球跨境并购网络中表现不一,可划分为外向型和内向型,以及核心国家(地区)、活跃国家(地区)和潜力国家(地区)。⑤ “一带一路”沿线地区参与跨境并购的活跃度较低。

关键词: 跨境并购, 海外投资, 复杂网络, “一带一路”

Abstract:

Cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are one of the important globalization strategies of multinational corporations. Using data from Zephyr global M&A database, this study built the global cross-border M&A network from 1997 to 2017 and analyzed the evolution of topology characteristics and structure. The analysis results are as follows. (1) Since the 1990s, global cross-border M&A have developed in a fluctuating manner. The topological characteristics show different features at different points, of which the global financial crisis in 2008 was an important turning point. (2) The small world characteristic of the global cross-border M&A network is prominent. The network is scale-free, and rich-club phenomenon of the acquiring party is more obvious than that of the acquired party. However, the rich-club phenomenon of both shows a decrease as the process of economic globalization with more and more developing countries/regions participating in the competition of cross-border M&A market. (3) The global cross-border M&A network shows a “core-edge” structure. The center has gradually transformed from dual-core (North America and Western Europe) structure to “global triangle” structure since the global financial crisis in 2008, of which East Asia and Southeast Asia constitute the third core. Nevertheless, Africa, South America and parts of Asia are the persistent peripheries. (4) Countries/regions play a different role in the global cross-border M&A network, so they can be divided into outward or inward in terms of net capital flow and core, active or potential players in terms of the scale of cross-border M&A. The performance of different countries/regions has changed a lot in 1997-2017, especially European regions. (5) Although some countries (Singapore, Poland, Czech, United Arab Emirates, etc.) become more and more important in the global cross-border M&A network, countries along the Belt and Road as a whole are not active in cross-border M&A, most of which are in a position of the edge. (6) China has grown from a potential player to a core player by attracting foreign investment and encouraging capital exports, but the link between China and Belt and Road countries in the aspect of cross-border M&A is weak and should be strengthened appropriately on the basis of host country’s resource endowment, industrial development, and institutional environment.

Key words: cross-border M&A, overseas investment, complex network, Belt and Road Initiative