地理研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 822-835.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190359

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市建成环境如何影响居民生理健康?——中介机制与实证检验

张延吉, 邓伟涛, 赵立珍(), 李苗裔   

  1. 福州大学建筑与城乡规划学院城乡规划系,福州350108
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-04 修回日期:2019-11-13 出版日期:2020-04-20 发布日期:2020-06-24
  • 通讯作者: 赵立珍
  • 作者简介:张延吉(1989- ),男,上海人,博士,讲师,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为城市地理学。E-mail: chairman7up@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJCZH258);国家社会科学基金青年项目(19CJY013)

How urban built environment affects residents' physical health? Mediating mechanism and empirical test

ZHANG Yanji, DENG Weitao, ZHAO Lizhen(), LI Miaoyi   

  1. Department of Urban and Rural Planning, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
  • Received:2019-05-04 Revised:2019-11-13 Online:2020-04-20 Published:2020-06-24
  • Contact: ZHAO Lizhen

摘要:

建成环境对公共健康的影响路径仍藏于黑箱中,且既有片段式分析多未考虑居住自选择问题。基于福州市社会调查,建构结构方程模型。研究发现:通过体力活动的中介作用,密度及多样性、道路通达性、形象维护管理、体育设施可达性均与生理健康自评值存在正向关联;前三类建成环境特征主要经由社会资本、犯罪活动、居住安全感对休闲型步行产生间接正向效应,中高强度体力活动则受到实体要素直接影响;通过饮食行为的中介作用,提高健康食物可达性能有效减少罹患慢性病的种类数。即使规避了自选择干扰,上述建成环境特征依然对生理健康状况具有显著影响,证明建成环境优化确是改善公共健康的可行途径,需在城市规划中兼顾体育和食物环境两项重点、硬件和软件环境两个层面。

关键词: 建成环境, 体力活动, 饮食行为, 健康城市, 居住自选择

Abstract:

The influence mechanism as well as impact path of built environment on public health was still hidden in the black box, and the existing western fragment analysis mostly failed to consider the issue of residential self-selection, which would cause estimation bias. To solve this problem, this research did a sample survey in the core urbanized area of Fuzhou so as to identify the mediating variables between urban built environment and the physiological health of residents. In order to avoid self-selection bias, robustness test was focused on the subgroups living in Danwei, Fanggaifang, or public housing communities that were unable to choose their own house independently. By using data of social survey, point of interest, road network and according to the structural equation model, functional density and diversity, road network accessibility, image maintenance and management, and accessibility of sports facilities had positive relationships with self-assessed physical health through the mediating role of physical activities. The above three characteristics had indirect positive effects on leisure walking behavior via accumulating community social capital, diminishing criminal activity and evaluating the sense of living security, while the moderate to vigorous physical activity was directly positively influenced by road network accessibility, functional density and diversity at the macro scale. Improving the accessibility of community sports facilities can promote both leisure walking and moderate to vigorous physical activity at the same time. Through mediating effect of healthy dietary behavior and unhealthy dietary behavior, the accessibility of healthy food was strongly negatively correlated with the number of chronic diseases. Even if the interference of residential self-selection was controlled within the subgroups, the above five types of built environment characteristics still had significant impact on physiological health, which proved that the optimization of built environment was indeed an effective and proactive way to improve public health. According to the standardized total effect, the influence of sports facilities and healthy food accessibility on physiological health was the highest, and the influence of the other three built environments was similar and moderate. Therefore, it was necessary to perfect both sports environment and food environment, while we evaluate both hardware environment (increasing road network density and functional diversity) and software environment (improving image maintenance and management) in healthy urban planning. The limitation of this paper is that the analysis was based on cross-sectional data and subjective measurements of physical activities and health indicators, which remained to be improved.

Key words: built environment, physical activity, eating behavior, healthy city, residential self-selection