战略耦合演化视角下的区域经济韧性分析框架

doi:10.11821/dlyj020210293

地理研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 3272-3286.doi: 10.11821/dlyj020210293

战略耦合演化视角下的区域经济韧性分析框架

胡晓辉¹(), 董柯², 杨宇³^,⁴^,⁵^,^*()

1.南京师范大学地理科学学院江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协调创新中心,南京 210023
2.浙江财经大学公共管理学院,杭州 310018
3.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室,北京 100101
4.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院,北京 100049
5.粤港澳大湾区战略研究院,广州 510070

收稿日期:2021-04-12 接受日期:2021-07-16 出版日期:2021-12-10 发布日期:2022-02-10
通讯作者: 杨宇（1984-）,男,山东威海人,研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为经济地理与区域发展、能源地理。E-mail: yangyu@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:胡晓辉（1982-）,男,浙江湖州人,副教授,博士生导师,研究方向为经济地理与产业动态。E-mail: huxh@njnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院青年创新促进会(2018069);中国科学院流域地理学重点实验室开放基金资助(WSGS2020005);北京大学-林肯研究院城市发展与土地政策研究中心基金项目(FS03-20201101-HXH)

An analytical framework on regional economic resilience from the perspective of evolutionary strategic coupling

HU Xiaohui¹(), DONG Ke², YANG Yu³^,⁴^,⁵^,^*()

1. School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China
2. School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China
3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China
4. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
5. The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Institute of Strategy Research, Guangzhou 510070, China

Received:2021-04-12 Accepted:2021-07-16 Published:2021-12-10 Online:2022-02-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在全球政治经济变局和多尺度危机冲击语境下,区域经济韧性已成为当下经济地理学探究区域发展动态的核心议题。区域经济韧性不仅有关本地经济属性和适应力,更受到外部联系动态的影响,在范式上需融入多尺度网络动态观。本文将全球生产网络理论中的战略耦合概念纳入到演化经济地理学的区域经济韧性思想中,对两部分文献进行计量分析和梳理对比。在此基础上,以战略耦合不同模式（即耦合、去耦合、再耦合）为切入点,构建了一套基于“战略耦合演化”的区域经济韧性分析框架。研究结论：① 任何一种战略耦合模式,均是一种“战略性求变”和“语境应对”的能动行为过程,是理解区域经济韧性尺度性与能力来源的核心。② 两者在“连接度”“语境敏感性”“路径发展”概念上有较高的思想共性,相互融合可提升区域经济韧性的理论内涵。③ 战略耦合的能动主体、目的、嵌入性程度及方式是理解区域经济韧性特征和机制的关键,有助于从“地方-全球连接互动”的视角来综合分析区域经济韧性的初始属性（区域优势）、过程（恢复、更新和转型）、能力（恢复力、转型力和更新力）和结果（多元路径发展趋势）。本文认为战略耦合演化视角有利于破除以往“区域主义”韧性思想,能更科学地剖析区域经济韧性的多尺度语境依赖、多主体能动过程和多要素互动机制。此外,有利于推动关系与演化经济地理范式的融合创新,对“双循环”战略下中国企业决策和区域经济发展有重要现实意义。

关键词: 区域经济韧性, 战略耦合, 演化经济地理学, 耦合模式, 理论融合

Abstract:

In the contexts of on-going global political-economic shifting and shocks of multi-scalar crises, regional economic resilience has become one of the key themes in economic geography for exploring regional development dynamics. Regional economic resilience is not only about local economic configurations and adaptability, but also related to extra-regional dynamics. Thus, it paradigmatically requires adopting a geographically multi-scalar and dynamic network perspective. This paper attempts to integrate the concept of strategic coupling from the GPN theory into the EEG-based regional economic resilience thinking, and to comparatively review the literature related to the two parts by bibliometric methods. Based on that, by focusing on different modes of evolutionary strategic coupling (including coupling, decoupling, and recoupling), the paper constructs an analytical framework of regional economic resilience from the perspective of strategic coupling in evolution. The paper concludes that: (1) any mode of strategic coupling is an agency-based process of strategic change and context-responding, which can be regarded as the core to understand the scalarity and the source of ability for regional economic resilience. (2) The two concepts come across several epistemological similarities on “connectedness”, “contextual sensitivity” and “path development”, and their integration can help to advance the understanding of regional economic resilience. (3) The agent's agency, motives, the degree of embeddedness and modes of strategic coupling are the keys to understand the ability and mechanism of regional economic resilience. This can also help to form a “local-global relational interaction” perspective to comprehensively explore the structural properties (regional advantages), processes (recovery, renewal, and reorientation), ability (recoverability, transformability, and renewal ability), and consequences (multiple development paths) of regional economic resilience. This paper argues that the perspective of strategic coupling in evolution can deconstruct the conventional “regionalism” wisdom of regional economic resilience, which can systematically help explore the causal mechanism of multi-scalarity, multi-agentic processes and multi-factor involved impacts in regional economic resilience. Moreover, this study fosters the integrative innovation between the relational and evolutionary paradigm and makes a practical contribution to corporation decision-making and regional economic development in China under the current “Double Circulation” strategy.

Key words: regional economic resilience, strategic coupling, Evolutionary Economic Geography, coupling mode, theoretical integration

胡晓辉, 董柯, 杨宇. 战略耦合演化视角下的区域经济韧性分析框架[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(12): 3272-3286.

HU Xiaohui, DONG Ke, YANG Yu. An analytical framework on regional economic resilience from the perspective of evolutionary strategic coupling[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 40(12): 3272-3286.

图/表 4

表1

图1

图2

表2

参考文献 75

[1]	刘卫东. 新冠肺炎疫情对经济全球化的影响分析. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1439-1449. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200514
	[ Liu Weidong. The impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the development of economic globalization. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(7): 1439-1449.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020200514. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200514
[2]	Bryson J R, Vanchan V. COVID-19 and alternative conceptualizations of value and risk in GPN research. Tijdschrift voor Economiche en Sociale Geograhie, 2020, 111(3): 530-542. DOI: 10.1111/tesg.12425. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12425
[3]	朱晟君, 殷子涵, 杨博飞, 等. 从生产能力到转产能力: 基于对疫情期间中国转产情况的思考. 地理研究, 2021, 40(2): 293-309. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200900
	[ Zhu Shengjun, Yin Zihan, Yang Bofei, et al. From productivity to capacity of production conversion: Based on consideration of China's capacity of production conversion during the epidemic. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(2): 293-309.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020200900. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200900
[4]	Wieland A. Dancing the supply chain: Toward transformative supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2021, 57(1): 58-73. DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12248. doi: 10.1111/jscm.12248
[5]	Gereffi G. What does the COVID-19 pandemic teach us about global value chains? The case of medical supplies. Journal of International Business Policy, 2020, 3(3): 287-301. DOI: 10.1057/s42214-020-00062-w. doi: 10.1057/s42214-020-00062-w
[6]	OECD. A Systemic Resilience Approach to Dealing with COVID-19 and Future Shocks. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020: 66.
[7]	Simmie J, Martin R. The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2010, 3(1): 27-43. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsp029. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsp029
[8]	胡晓辉. 区域经济弹性研究述评及未来展望. 外国经济与管理, 2012, 34(8): 64-72.
	[ Hu Xiaohui. Regional economic resilience: A review and research agendas. Foreign Economics & Management, 2012, 34(8): 64-72.] DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2012.08.005. doi: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2012.08.005
[9]	胡晓辉, 张文忠. 制度演化与区域经济弹性: 两个资源枯竭型城市的比较. 地理研究, 2018, 75(12): 2684-2698.
	[ Hu Xiaohui, Zhang Wenzhong. Institutional evolution and regional economic resilience: A comparison of two resource-exhausted cities in China. Geographical Research, 2018, 75(12): 2684-2698.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201807005. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807005
[10]	关皓明, 杨青山, 浩飞龙, 等. 基于“产业-企业-空间”的沈阳市经济韧性特征. 地理学报, 2021, 76(2): 415-427. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102012
	[ Guan Haoming, Yang Qingshan, Hao Feilong, et al. Economic resilience characteristics of Shenyang city based on a perspective of industry-enterprise-space. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(2): 415-427.] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202102012. doi: 10.11821/dlxb202102012
[11]	Hassink R. Regional resilience: A promising concept to explain differences in regional economic adaptability?. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2010, 3(1): 45-58. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsp033. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsp033
[12]	Martin R. Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks. Journal of Economic Geography, 2012, 12(1): 1-32. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbr019. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr019
[13]	Bristow G, Healy A. Regional resilience: An agency perspective. Regional Studies, 2014, 48(5): 923-935. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.854879. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.854879
[14]	Boschma R. Towards an evolutionary perspective on regional resilience. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(5): 733-751. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.959481
[15]	Martin R, Sunley P, Gardiner B, et al. How regions react to recessions: Resilience and the role of economic structure. Regional Studies, 2016, 50(4): 561-585. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2015.1136410
[16]	Hu X, Hassink R. Exploring adaptation and adaptability in uneven economic resilience: A tale of two Chinese mining regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2017, 10(3): 527-541. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsx012. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsx012
[17]	Bristow G, Healy A. Handbook on Regional Economic Resilience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020: 3, 7, 21, 30.
[18]	Hardy J, Imani Y, Zhuang B. Regional resilience and global production networks in China: An open political economy perspective. Competition and Change, 2018, 22(1): 63-80. DOI: 10.1177/1024529417744177. doi: 10.1177/1024529417744177
[19]	Martin R, Sunley P. On the notion of regional economic resilience: Conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Economic Geography, 2015, 15(1): 1-42. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbu015. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbu015
[20]	Hu X, Yang C. Institutional change and divergent economic resilience: Path development of two resource-depleted cities in China. Urban Studies, 2019, 56(16): 3466-3485. DOI: 10.1177/0042098018817223. doi: 10.1177/0042098018817223
[21]	Hu X, Hassink R. Adaptation, adaptability and regional economic resilience:A conceptual framework. In: Bristow G, A Healy. Handbook on Regional Economic Resilience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020: 55, 58, 166.
[22]	McCann P, Ortega-Argilés R. Smart specialization, regional growth and applications to European Union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(8): 1291-1302. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.799769
[23]	Rutherford T, Holmes J. Reindustrialising regions: Rebuilding the manufacturing economy?. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society, 2014, 7(3): 351-358. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsu023. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsu023
[24]	MacKinnon D. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography, 2012, 12(1): 227-245. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbr009. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbr009
[25]	刘逸. 关系经济地理的研究脉络与中国实践理论创新. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1005-1017. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020191002
	[ Liu Yi. Progress of relational economic geography: Whether theorizing China's experiences. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(5): 1005-1017.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020191002. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020191002
[26]	刘逸. 战略耦合的研究脉络与问题. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1421-1434. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807013
	[ Liu Yi. Theoretical thread and problems of strategic coupling. Geography Research, 2018, 37(7): 1421-1434.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201807013. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807013
[27]	刘逸, 杨伟聪. 全球生产网络视角下珠三角区域经济的战略耦合与产业升级. 热带地理, 2019, 39(2): 155-169.
	[ Liu Yi, Yeung H W. Strategic coupling and industrial upgrading in the Pearl River Delta: A Global Production Network perspective. Tropical Geography, 2019, 39(2): 155-169.] DOI: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003124. doi: 10.13284/j.cnki.rddl.003124
[28]	Liu Y. Local Dynamics of Industrial Upgrading:The Case of the Pearl River Delta in China. Singapore: Springer, 2020: 11, 21.
[29]	Yeung H W. Regional development in the global economy: A dynamic perspective of strategic coupling in global production networks. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 2015, 7(1): 1-23. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12055. doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12055
[30]	Yeung H W. The trouble with global production networks. Environment and Planning A, 2021, 53(2): 428-438. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X20972720. doi: 10.1177/0308518X20972720
[31]	Hu X, Hassink R. Explaining differences in the adaptability of old industrial areas. In: Hilpert U. Routledge Handbook of Politics & Technology. New York: Routledge, 2015: 56, 165, 172.
[32]	刘逸, 纪捷韩, 张一帆, 等. 粤港澳大湾区经济韧性的特征与空间差异研究. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2029-2043. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200418
	[ Liu Yi, Ji Jiehan, Zhang Yifan, et al. Economic resilience and spatial divergence in the Guangdong Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(9): 2029-2043.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020200418. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020200418
[33]	Yeung H W. Regional worlds: From related variety in regional diversification to strategic coupling in global production networks. Regional Studies, 2021, 55(6): 989-1010. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1857719. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1857719
[34]	俞国军, 贺灿飞, 朱晟君. 产业集群韧性: 技术创新、关系治理与市场多元化. 地理研究, 2020, 39(6): 1343-1356. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190560
	[ Yu Guojun, He Canfei, Zhu Shengjun. Industrial cluster resilience: Technological innovation, relational governance, and market diversification. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(6): 1343-1356.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190560. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190560
[35]	Grunsven L, Hutchinson F E. The evolution of the electronics industry in Johor (Malaysia): Strategic coupling, adaptiveness, adaptation, and the role of agency. Geoforum, 2016, 74: 74-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.05.011. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.05.011
[36]	Barnes T, Sheppard E. ‘Nothing includes everything’: Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography, 2010, 34(2): 193-214. DOI: 10.1177/0309132509343728. doi: 10.1177/0309132509343728
[37]	MacKinnon D, Dawley S, Pike A, et al. Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economic approach. Economic Geography, 2019, 92(2): 113-135. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
[38]	胡晓辉, 朱晟君, Hassink R. 超越演化: 老工业区重塑研究进展与理论反思. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1028-1044. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190993
	[ Hu Xiaohui, Zhu Shengjun, Hassink R. Beyond the “evolutionary approach”: A critical review and paradigmatic reflections on the restructuring of old industrial areas. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(5): 1028-1044.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190993. doi: 10.11821/dlyj020190993
[39]	Christopherson S, Michie J, Tyler P. Regional resilience: Theoretical and empirical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2010, 3(1): 3-10. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsq004. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsq004
[40]	Coe N M, Hess M, Yeung H W, et al. Globalizing' regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2004, 29(4): 468-484. DOI: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x
[41]	Yeung H W. Rethinking relational economic geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2005, 30(1): 37-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00150.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00150.x
[42]	Yeung H W. Regional development and the competitive dynamics of global production networks: An East Asian perspective. Regional Studies, 2009, 43(3): 325-351. DOI: 10.1080/00343400902777059. doi: 10.1080/00343400902777059
[43]	Yang C. Strategic coupling of regional development in global production networks: Redistribution of (Chinese)Taiwanese personal computer investment from the Pearl River Delta to the Yangtze River Delta, China. Regional Studies, 2009, 43(3): 385-407. DOI: 10.1080/00343400802508836. doi: 10.1080/00343400802508836
[44]	王琛, 郭一琼. 地方产业抵御经济危机的弹性影响因素: 以电子信息产业为例. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7):1297-1307. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807004
	[ Wang Chen, Guo Yiqiong. Resilience and resistance of local industry to economic crisis: A case study of China's IT industry. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(7): 1297-1307.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201807004. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807004
[45]	谭俊涛, 赵宏波, 刘文新, 等. 中国区域经济韧性特征与影响因素分析. 地理科学, 2020, 40(2): 173-181. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.02.002
	[ Tan Juntao, Zhao Hongbo, Liu Wenxin, et al. Regional economic resilience and influential mechanism during economic crises in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 173-181.] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.02.002. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.02.002
[46]	Pike A, Dawley S, Tomaney J. Resilience, adaptation and adaptability. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2010, 3(1): 59-70. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsq001. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsq001
[47]	Yeung H W. Rethinking mechanism and process in the geographical analysis of uneven development. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2019, 9(3): 226-255. DOI: 10.1177/2043820619861861. doi: 10.1177/2043820619861861
[48]	MacKinnon D, Derickson K D. From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography, 2013, 37(2): 253-270. DOI: 10.1177/0309132512454775. doi: 10.1177/0309132512454775
[49]	Henderson J, Dicken P, Hess M, et al. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 2002, 9(3): 436-464. DOI: 10.1080/09692290210150842. doi: 10.1080/09692290210150842
[50]	Yeung H W. Strategic Coupling:East Asian Industrial Transformation in the New Global Economy. New York: Cornell University Press, 2016: 10, 20, 127, 180.
[51]	Yang C. From strategic coupling to recoupling and decoupling: Restructuring global production networks and regional evolution in China. European Planning Studies, 2013, 21(7): 1046-1063. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.733852. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.733852
[52]	Yang C. The rise of strategic partner firms and reconfiguration of personal computer production networks in China: Insights from the emerging laptop cluster in Chongqing. Geoforum, 2017, 84(1): 21-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.010. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.010
[53]	MacKinnon D, Dawley S, Steen M, et al. Path creation, global production networks and regional development: A comparative international analysis of the offshore wind sector. Progress in Planning, 2019, 130: 1-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2018.01.001
[54]	Dawley S. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography, 2014, 90(1): 91-112. DOI: 10.1111/ecge.12028. doi: 10.1111/ecge.12028
[55]	Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(3): 293-313. DOI: 10.2307/144402. doi: 10.2307/144402
[56]	朱华友, 王缉慈. 全球生产网络中企业去地方化的形成与机理研究. 地理科学, 2014, 34(1): 19-24. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.01.19
	[ Zhu Huayou, Wang Jici. The form and mechanism of firms delocalization in the Global Production Network. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(1): 19-24.] DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.01.19. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.01.19
[57]	贺灿飞, 陈航航. 参与全球生产网络与中国出口产品升级. 地理学报, 2017, 72(8): 1331-1346. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201708001
	[ He Canfei, Chen Hanghang. Participation in global production networks and export product upgrading. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(8): 1331-1346.] DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201708001. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201708001
[58]	陈作任, 李郇. 经济韧性视角下城镇产业演化的路径依赖与路径创造: 基于东莞市樟木头、常平镇的对比分析. 人文地理, 2018, 162(4): 113-120.
	[ Chen Zuoren, Li Xun. Path dependence and path creation of industrial evolution about towns from the perspective of economic resilience: Based on the comparative analysis about Zhangmutou and Changping. Human Geography, 2018, 162(4): 113-120.] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.04.016. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.04.016
[59]	Tan J, Hu X, Hassink R, et al. Industrial structure or agency: What affects regional economic resilience? Evidence from resource-based cities in China. Cities, 2020, 106(2): 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102906
[60]	Grillitsch M, Sotarauta M. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 2020, 44(4): 704-723. DOI: 10.1177/0309132519853870. doi: 10.1177/0309132519853870
[61]	Pendall R, Foster K A, Cowell M, et al. Resilience and Regions:Building Understanding of The Metaphor. New York: Cornell University, 2009: 15.
[62]	Huggins R, Thompson P. Local entrepreneurial resilience and culture: The role of social values in fostering economic recovery. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2015, 8(2): 313-330. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsu035. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsu035
[63]	Wrana J, Nguyan T X T. ‘Strategic coupling’ and regional development in a transition economy: What can we learn from Vietnam?. Area Development and Policy, 2019, 4(4): 454-465. DOI: 10.1080/23792949.2019.1608838. doi: 10.1080/23792949.2019.1608838
[64]	Liu W D, Dicken P. Transnational corporations and “obligated embeddedness”: Foreign direct investment in China's automobile industry. Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38(7): 1229-1247. DOI: 10.1068/a37206. doi: 10.1068/a37206
[65]	贺灿飞, 毛熙彦. 尺度重构视角下的经济全球化研究. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(9): 1073-1083. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.09.001
	[ He Canfei, Mao Xiyan. Economic globalization research based on scale-construction in western human geography. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(9): 1073-1083.] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.09.001. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2015.09.001
[66]	李健, 宁越敏, 汪明峰. 计算机产业全球生产网络分析: 兼论其在中国大陆的发展. 地理学报, 2008, 63(4): 437-448.
	[ Li Jian, Ning Yuemin, Wang Mingfeng. Global Production Networks of computer industry and its development in Mainland China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2008, 63(4): 437-448.] DOI: 10.11821/xb200804008. doi: 10.11821/xb200804008
[67]	Butollo F. Growing against the odds: Government agency and strategic recoupling as sources of competitiveness in the garment industry of the Pearl River Delta. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2015, 8(3): 521-536. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsv020. doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsv020
[68]	Yang C, Fu T, Li L. Emerging adaptation of local clusters in China in a shifting global economy: Evidence from the furniture cluster in Houjie town, Dongguan. Growth and Change, 2017, 48(2): 214-232. DOI: 10.1111/grow.12191. doi: 10.1111/grow.12191
[69]	Sweeney B, Mordue G, Carey J. Resilient or resistant? Critical reflections on resilience in an old industrial region. Geoforum, 2020, (110): 125-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.005. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.005
[70]	李连刚, 张平宇, 谭俊涛, 等. 韧性概念演变与区域经济韧性研究进展. 人文地理, 2019, 34(2): 1-7.
	[ Li Liangang, Zhang Pingyu, Tan Juntao, et al. Review on evolution of resilience concept and research progress on regional economic resilience. Human Geography, 2019, 34(2): 1-7.] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.001. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.001
[71]	Trippl M, Grillitsch M, Isaksen A. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 42(5): 687-705. DOI: 10.1177/0309132517700982. doi: 10.1177/0309132517700982
[72]	Zhu S, Guo Q, He C. Strong links and weak links: How do unrelated industries survive in an unfriendly environment. Economic Geography, 2021, 97(2): 1-23. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1837618. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1837618
[73]	符天蓝, 杨春. 市场转向与产业升级路径分析: 以珠江三角洲出口导向型家具产业为例. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1460-1474. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807016
	[ Fu Tianlan, Yang Chun. Market reorientation and industrial upgrading trajectories: Evidence from the export-oriented furniture industry in the Pearl River Delta. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(7): 1460-1474.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201807016. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201807016
[74]	高菠阳, 刘卫东. 政府空间治理与地方产业发展响应: 以重庆市电子信息产业为例. 人文地理, 2016, 31(3): 1-8.
	[ Gao Boyang, Liu Weidong. Spatial governance and local response of industrial development: The rise of the computer industry in Chongqiong. Human Geography, 2016, 31(3): 1-8.] DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.03.001. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.03.001
[75]	Welsh M. Resilience and responsibility: Governing uncertainty in a complex world. Geographical Journal, 2014, 180(1): 15-26. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12012. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12012

特征方面	区域经济韧性	战略耦合
范式基础	演化经济地理学	关系经济地理学
理论根源	路径依赖、复杂适应系统（扰沌）	全球生产网络
研究问题	区域经济体如何抵御和应对特定冲击或危机的过程与能力,及发展长期适应力的属性和机制。	区域资产在能动者作用下与GPN中领头企业需求的匹配关系过程,及对区域发展的影响机制。
主要概念	抵抗性、敏感性、恢复力、适应、适应力、路径发展、鲁棒性等	耦合、去耦合、再耦合、网络权力、嵌入性等
影响因素	结构属性和能动性要素	区域资产、空间粘性、战略能动性等
研究尺度	多地理尺度（不一定涉及跨国）	多地理尺度（需涉及跨国）
研究方法	定性案例研究、定量测度研究	定性案例研究
影响结果	影响区域经济竞争力	影响区域经济发展前景

模式	亚模式情景	区域经济韧性的特征概括
耦合	（1）依附式外生耦合	区域优势：弱且不稳定外部连接度：增加且脆弱权力关系：跨国公司强势韧性能力：弱路径发展：路径增强和延伸韧性过程：抵抗和恢复
耦合	（2）吸收式内生耦合	区域优势：强且稳定外部连接度：增加且稳定权力关系：平等互惠韧性能力：强路径发展：路径创造和多元化韧性过程：更新和转型
去耦合	（1）地方主动去耦合	区域优势：强且增加外部连接度：减少权力关系：地方强势韧性能力：强路径发展：路径突破或创造韧性过程：更新和转型
去耦合	（2）跨国公司主动去耦合	区域优势：弱且减小外部连接度：减少权力关系：跨国公司强势韧性能力：弱路径发展：路径衰退和锁定韧性过程：抵抗和恢复
再耦合	互惠式或吸收式耦合	区域优势：强且增加外部连接度：增加且稳定权力关系：地方强势韧性能力：强路径发展：路径升级与转型韧性过程：更新和转型

战略耦合演化视角下的区域经济韧性分析框架

An analytical framework on regional economic resilience from the perspective of evolutionary strategic coupling

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 75

相关文章 12

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王璐玮, 汪涛, 张晗. 全球生产网络与本土创新网络的战略耦合动态——以中国生物医药产业为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(12): 3314-3332.
[2]	刘逸, 纪捷韩, 许汀汀, 张晓琳. 战略耦合对区域经济韧性的影响研究——以广东省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(12): 3382-3398.
[3]	吴頔, 丁婧, 袁丰. 政府能动性对外部冲击型战略耦合断裂的暂时性调节研究——以江苏省昆山市为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(12): 3470-3482.
[4]	陈肖飞, 韩腾腾, 赵梓渝, 苗长虹. 劳动力视角下跨国公司地方嵌入与区域发展战略耦合机制——以富士康郑州投资为例[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(12): 3483-3496.
[5]	刘逸, 纪捷韩, 张一帆, 杨宇. 粤港澳大湾区经济韧性的特征与空间差异研究[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(9): 2029-2043.
[6]	胡晓辉, 朱晟君, RobertHassink. 超越“演化”:老工业区重构研究进展与范式反思[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1028-1044.
[7]	朱晟君, 金文纨, 胡晓辉. 关联视角下的区域产业动态研究进展与反思[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1045-1055.
[8]	刘清, 杨永春, 蒋小荣. 全球价值生产的空间组织：以苹果手机供应链为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12): 2743-2762.
[9]	刘志高, 张薇. 中国大都市区高新技术产业分叉过程及动力机制——以武汉生物产业为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1349-1363.
[10]	刘逸. 战略耦合的研究脉络与问题[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1421-1434.
[11]	符天蓝, 杨春. 市场转向与产业升级路径分析——以珠江三角洲出口导向型家具产业为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1460-1474.
[12]	苗长虹, 魏也华. 分工深化、知识创造与产业集群成长——河南鄢陵县花木产业的案例研究[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(4): 853-864.