跨学科聚焦的新领域：流动的时间、空间与社会

doi:10.11821/dlyj201610001

地理研究 ›› 2016, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 1801-1818.doi: 10.11821/dlyj201610001

• 观点与争鸣 • 下一篇

跨学科聚焦的新领域：流动的时间、空间与社会

孙九霞¹(), 周尚意², 王宁³, 朱竑⁴, 周大鸣³, 甄峰⁵, 刘行健⁶, 杨晶晶⁷, 陈敬复⁸, 杨茜好⁹

1. 中山大学旅游学院,广州 510275
2. 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院,北京 100875
3. 中山大学社会学与人类学学院,广州 510275
4. 华南师范大学文化产业与文化地理研究中心,广州 510631
5. 南京大学建筑与城市规划学院,南京 210093
6. 香港大学城市规划与设计系,香港 999077
7. 萨里大学饭店与旅游管理学院,吉尔福德 GU27XH,英国
8. 新加坡国立大学地理系,新加坡 119077,新加坡
9. 广东省旅游控股集团旅游产业研究院,广州 510115

收稿日期:2016-07-22 修回日期:2016-09-20 出版日期:2016-10-10 发布日期:2016-10-10
作者简介:
作者简介：孙九霞（1969- ）,女,山东寿光人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为旅游人类学、旅游地理学、社区旅游。E-mail: sunjx@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目（15ZDB118）;国家自然科学基金项目（41171124）

Mobility in geographical research: Time, space and society

Jiuxia SUN¹(), Shangyi ZHOU², Ning WANG³, Hong ZHU⁴, Daming ZHOU³, Feng ZHEN⁵, Xingjian LIU⁶, Jingjing YANG⁷, Jing-fu CHEN⁸, Xihao YANG⁹

1. School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
2. Department of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
3. School of Sociology and Anthropology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
4. Center for Social and Cultural Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510275, China
5. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
6. Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China
7. School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, University of Surrey, Guildford GU27XH, UK.
8. Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore
9. Guangdong Provincial Tourism Holdings Group Tourism Industry Academy Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510115, China

Received:2016-07-22 Revised:2016-09-20 Online:2016-10-10 Published:2016-10-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在全球化对社会产生深刻影响的当下,流动获得了内涵和外延的立体化与多面性,各种类型的流动正表征并重塑地方、社会结构和价值观念。如何认识流动、分析流动对理解当前世界多重空间尺度的各类社会文化现象、理解空间及附加其上的意义具有重要影响。一方面,流动性是流动实践空前增强的过程,这个过程既发生在全球与区域的尺度上,也发生在城市内部日常生活与通勤的尺度上。另一方面,流动性对于人文社会科学中基本概念的阐释具有革命性的作用,例如地方,认同这些话题都需要从流动性的视角进行重新思考。以时间和空间作为刻画流动性的基础尺标,在新流动性范式下,从地方、城市、移民、旅游、身份认同、政策与管制等方面探讨流动性多层次的社会文化意义,期于在流动性这一场域进行跨学科的对话,并促使国内学界对流动现象的关注上升为对流动性理论本身的解读。

关键词: 跨学科, 流动性, 理论创新, 空间与地方实践, 地理研究

Abstract:

With the profound impact of globalization on society, the connotation and denotation of mobility have become three-dimensional and multi-faceted today. Various types of mobilities are representing and reshaping our social structure and values. How to analyze and understand mobility has important implications on our cognition of social culture, local structure and contextual significance, as well as all kinds of socio-cultural phenomena which are currently measured by multiple spatial scales. On the one hand, mobility is an unprecedented enhancement of movement. This process not only occurs in the global and regional scales, but also in the scale of daily life and commuting within the urban areas. On the other hand, mobility overturns our understanding of the basic conceptions in humanities and social sciences in a revolutionary way. For example we need to rethink these crucial issues like space and identity with a perspective of mobility. Under the new paradigm—taking time and space as a basic judgement of mobility, the multi-layered and three-dimensional sociocultural meaning of mobility is thus to be discussed in terms of regions, cities, immigration, tourism, identity, policy, regulation and so on. This practice offers a field for interdisciplinary dialogue and communication which carries the expectation of providing references and prospects for lifting the discussion on movement to mobility.

Key words: interdiscipline, mobility, theoretical innovation, space and local practice, geographical research

孙九霞, 周尚意, 王宁, 朱竑, 周大鸣, 甄峰, 刘行健, 杨晶晶, 陈敬复, 杨茜好. 跨学科聚焦的新领域：流动的时间、空间与社会[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(10): 1801-1818.

Jiuxia SUN, Shangyi ZHOU, Ning WANG, Hong ZHU, Daming ZHOU, Feng ZHEN, Xingjian LIU, Jingjing YANG, Jing-fu CHEN, Xihao YANG. Mobility in geographical research: Time, space and society[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 35(10): 1801-1818.

参考文献 31

[1]	Urry J.Sociology Beyond Societies: Mobilities for the Twenty-first Century. London, New York: Routledge, 2000: 2.
[2]	Cresswell T.The Right to Mobility:The Production of Mobility in the Courtroom. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2006, 38: 735-754. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2006.00474.x
[3]	Adey P.Mobility. London and New York: Routledge, 2009.
[4]	Christaller W.Central Places in Southern Germany. London: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
[5]	Sheller M, Urry J.The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38(2): 207-226.
[6]	Hannam K, Sheller M, Urry J.Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings. Mobilities, 2006, 1(1): 1-22. doi: 10.1080/17450100500489189
[7]	钱俊希, 朱竑. 新文化地理学的理论统一性与话题多样性. 地理研究, 2015, 34(3): 422-436. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201503003
	[Qian Junxi, Zhu Hong.Theoretical unity and thematic diversity in new cultural geography. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(3): 422-436.] doi: 10.11821/dlyj201503003
[8]	郭慧泉, 张国友, 何书金. 近年来美国地理学研究热点问题. 地理研究, 2013, 32(7): 1375-1377.
	[Guo Huiquan, Zhang Guoyou, He Shujin.American geography research hot spots in recent years. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(7): 1375-1377.]
[9]	Mitchell K.Citizenship. In: Gregory D, Johnston R, Pratt G, et al. The Dictionary of Human Geography(5th edition). Mal (MA): Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009: 85.
[10]	Huntington S P.The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996.
[11]	周尚意. 区域三大本性与主体性. 地理教育, 2015, (6): 1.
	[Zhou Shangyi.Three nature and the subjectivity of region.Geographical Education, 2015, (6): 1.]
[12]	Fridolfsson C, Elander I.Faith and place: Constructing Muslim identity in a secular Lutheran society. Cultural Geographies, 2012, 20(3): 319-337. doi: 10.1177/1474474012464024
[13]	Cresswell T, Merriman P.Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2011.
[14]	Kellerman A.Mobility or mobilities: Terrestrial, virtual and aerial categories or entities?. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19(4): 729-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.08.015
[15]	Merriman P.Driving Spaces: A Cultural-historical Geography of England'S M1 Motorway. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007.
[16]	Doreen M.Space, Place and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.
[17]	赵旭东. 从社会转型到文化转型: 当代中国社会的特征及其转化. 中山大学学报: 社会科学版, 2013, 53(3): 111-124.
	[Zhao Xudong.From social transformation to cultural transformation: Characteristics of contemporary Chinese society and its transformation. Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University: Social Science Edition, 2013, 53(3): 111-124.]
[18]	马戎. 关于当前中国城市民族关系的几点思考. 西北民族研究, 2009, (1): 6-19.
	[Ma Rong.Several issues in ethnic relations in urban China. Northwest Ethno-National Studies, 2009, (1): 6-19.]
[19]	周大鸣. 社会建设视野中的城市社区治理和多民族参与. 思想战线, 2012, (5): 11-17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-778X.2012.05.002
	[Zhou Daming.The governance of urban community and participation of multi-ethnic in the field of society construction. Thinking, 2012, (5): 11-17.] doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-778X.2012.05.002
[20]	单霁翔. 城市文化与传统文化、地域文化和文化多样性. 南方文物, 2007, (2): 2-28.
	[Shan Jixiang.Urban culture and traditional culture, regional culture and cultural diversity. Relics From South, 2007, (2): 2-28.]
[21]	周大鸣, 杨小柳. 浅层融入与深度区隔: 广州韩国人的文化适应. 民族研究, 2014, (2): 51-60.
	[Zhou Daming, Yang Xiaoliu.The superficial integration and the deep separation: The cultural adaptation of the Koreans in Guangzhou. Ethno-National Studies, 2014, (2): 51-60.]
[22]	李志刚, 杜枫. 中国大城市的外国人“族裔经济区”研究: 对广州“巧克力城”的实证. 人文地理, 2012, 27(6): 1-6.
	[Li Zhigang, Du Feng.The transnational making of 'Chocolate City' in Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2012, 27(6): 1-6.]
[23]	Heidegger M.Being and Time. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996: 6.
[24]	Castells M.The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional Process. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
[25]	Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge. MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
[26]	Kwan M P.Mobile communications, social networks, and urban travel: Hybertext as a new metaphor for conceptualizing spatial interaction. The Professional Geography, 2007, 59(4): 434-446.
[27]	Martinsons M G.Online success in a relationship-based economy: Profiles of e-commerce in China. In: Davison R M, Harris R W. Information System in Developing Countries: Theory and Practice. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, 2005: 173-191.
[28]	Coser L A.The Functions of Social Conflict. London: Routledge, 1956.
[29]	Yang J, Ryan C, Zhang L.Social conflict in communities impacted by tourism. Tourism Management, 2013, 35(2): 82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.06.002
[30]	Cresswell T.On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World. London: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
[31]	Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.

跨学科聚焦的新领域：流动的时间、空间与社会

Mobility in geographical research: Time, space and society

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 31

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘逸. 关系经济地理的研究脉络与中国实践理论创新[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1005-1017.
[2]	郭文. 空间意义的叠写与地方认同——中国最后一个原始部落翁丁案例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(11): 2449-2465.
[3]	张朝枝, 张鑫. 流动性的旅游体验模型建构——基于骑行入藏者的研究[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(12): 2332-2342.
[4]	刘宇峰, 袁丽华, 朱晓华. 《地理研究》“观点与争鸣”栏目文献计量分析[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(10): 2017-2026.
[5]	唐雪琼, 杨茜好, 钱俊希. 流动性视角下边界的空间实践及其意义——以云南省河口县中越边境地区X村为例[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(8): 1535-1546.
[6]	刘宇峰, 原志华, 郭玲霞, 朱晓华. 基于CNKI的1982-2014年《地理研究》载文情况统计分析[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(6): 1188-1202.
[7]	詹永锋, 王洪波, 邓辉. 民国时期中国地理研究所钩沉[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(9): 1768-1777.
[8]	湛东升, 孟斌, 张文忠. 北京市居民居住满意度感知与行为意向研究[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(2): 336-348.
[9]	陈彦光. 地理学多视角研究方法——Braess网络车流分配过程的理论分析与数值计算[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(6): 1367-1380.
[10]	冯健, 王永海. 中关村高校周边居住区社会空间特征及其形成机制[J]. 地理研究, 2008, 27(5): 1003-1016.
[11]	王守春. 宁夏历史地理集成与开拓之作[J]. 地理研究, 2006, 25(1): 182-182.
[12]	邓辉. 沙漠历史地理研究领域的重要成果——评《河西走廊历史时期沙漠化研究》[J]. 地理研究, 2003, 22(6): 810-810.
[13]	王艳平, 仲桂清. 论地理学研究的市场策划功能[J]. 地理研究, 1994, 13(2): 90-94.