卧龙自然保护区土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响

doi:10.11821/yj2002060003

地理研究 ›› 2002, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 682-688.doi: 10.11821/yj2002060003

卧龙自然保护区土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响

刘世梁, 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 吕一河, 马克明

中国科学院生态环境研究中心系统生态重点实验室,北京100085

收稿日期:2002-04-24 修回日期:2002-08-12 出版日期:2002-12-15 发布日期:2002-12-15
作者简介:刘世梁(1976-),男,山东临沂人,博士生。主要从事景观生态学研究。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(G20000046807);中国科学院知识创新项目(KZCX2-405)资助

Effects of land use changes on soil properties in Wolong Nature Reserve

LIU Shi-liang, FU Bo-jie, CHEN Li-ding, LU Yi-he, MA Ke-ming

Key Lab of Systems Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, CAS, Beijing 100085, China

Received:2002-04-24 Revised:2002-08-12 Online:2002-12-15 Published:2002-12-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

森林景观受干扰后的次生演替、人工林种植与农业耕作等在许多方面影响着土壤性质的变化。研究选取了四川卧龙自然保护区作为研究地点 ,阐述湿润高山区的土地利用方式与土壤性质之间的关系。选择了六种典型的土地利用方式加以比较 ,方差分析结果表明 ,不同土地利用之间土壤容重、全氮、有机碳、速效磷、速效钾的含量差异显著。相比之下 ,农田土壤养分含量偏低 ,而灌丛有着较高的有机碳、总氮与有效氮含量。 0～ 4 0cm土壤碳的储量变化幅度不大。综合土壤退化指数表明 ,坡耕地 ,撂荒地与人工林有土壤退化的趋势 ,而灌丛与次生林对土壤的性质有着改善的作用。人工林年龄与土壤有机碳、有机氮的含量正相关。

关键词: 土壤性质, 土地利用, 土壤退化指数, 卧龙

Abstract:

Natural secondary succession, forest planting and agricultural practices after deforestation or human disturbance affect soil properties in many aspects. Characterizing soil nutrients in relation to land use/land cover types and history is important for understanding how ecosystems work and assess the effects of future land use change. A study was initiated in Wolong Nature Reserve, Sichuan province, China to elucidate the complex relationships in the humid mountainous region. Six typical ecosystems (natural forestland, grassland, shrubby land, secondary forestland, cultivated land and reforested land) were compared.Significant differences among land use were found for soil bulk density (BD), total nitrogen (TN). Cultivated land had the lowest levels for most soil nutrients compared to other ecosystems and shrubby land had a higher soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN) and available nitrogen (AN). There was no much difference in 0-40 cm soil carbon mass between different land use practices. Soil carbon storage (TC) of different land use indicated that land use had a greater effect on SOC greater than on BD. The comprehensive soil deterioration index (DI) showed that the cultivated land, grassland and reforested land had the lower and negative values, while the shrubby land and secondary forestland had positive values, 12% and 1% respectively. The results gave a hint that in areas where the climate is fit for secondary succession "leave the nature as it is" is a better choice for the policy of "returning farmland to forest land" in China especially for the mountainous region lack of labor and finance support. Five reforestation periods were arranged from 0-10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-40 and 41-50 years. The results showed that reforestation could greatly change soil properties. The BD, SOC and TN were significantly different between the reforested periods, but the pH, TK, AN, AP and AK showed no significant trends.Further studies on the relationship of reforestation and the soil properties gave the results that the TC and TN had a good linear relationship with the reforested years and the DI index increased since reforestation.

Key words: soil property, land use type, soil deterioration index, Wolong Nature Reserve

刘世梁, 傅伯杰, 陈利顶, 吕一河, 马克明. 卧龙自然保护区土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2002, 21(6): 682-688.

LIU Shi-liang, FU Bo-jie, CHEN Li-ding, LU Yi-he, MA Ke-ming. Effects of land use changes on soil properties in Wolong Nature Reserve[J]. GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2002, 21(6): 682-688.

参考文献

[1] 　Fu B J,Chen L D,Ma K M,et al.The relationships between land use and soil conditions in t he hilly area of t he LoessPlateau in nort hern Shaanxi,China.Catena,2000,39:69～78.
[2] 　Montagnini F,Mendelsohn R O.Managing forest fallows:improving t he economics of swidden agriculture.Ambio,1997,26(2):118～123.
[3] 　刘彦随,陈百明.中国可持续发展问题与土地利用/覆被变化研究.地理研究,2002,5(3):324～330.
[4] 　Islam K R,Weil R R.Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh.Agriculture,Ecosys2tems and Environment,2000,79:9～16.
[5] 　刘光崧.土壤理化分析与剖面描述.北京:中国标准出版社,1996.50～112.
[6] 　Adejuwon J O,Ekanade O.A comparison of soil properties under different land use t ypes in a part of t he Nigerian cocoabelt.Catena,1988,15:319～331.
[7] 　Lowery B,Swan J,Schumacher T,et al.Physical properties of selected soils by erosion class.Journal of Soil and WaterConservation,1995,50:306～311.
[8] 　Davidson E A,Ackerman I L.Changes of soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils.Biogeo2chemistry,1993,20:161～193.
[9] 　Post W M,Kwon K C.Soil Carbon Sequestration and land-use change:processes and potential.Global Change Biology,2000,6:317～328.
[10] 　Brejda J J.Soil changes following 18 years of protection from grazing in Arizona chaparral.The Sout hwestern Naturalist,1997,42:478～487.
[11] 　Carter M R,Gregorich E G,Angers D A,et al.Organic C and N storage,and organic C fractions,in adjacent cultivatedand forested soils of eastern Canada.Soil&Tillage Research,1998,47:253～261.
[12] 　王绍强,周成虎.中国陆地土壤有机碳库的估算.地理研究,1999,18(4):348～355.
[13] 　Susan J P,David L P,David R H.Carbon distribution in subalpine forests and meadows of t he Olympic Mountains Wash2ington.Soil Science Society American Journal,2000,64:1834～1845.
[14] 　Wang J,Fu B J,Qiu Y,et al.Soil nutrients in relation to land use and landscape position in t he semi-arid small catch2ment on Loess Plateau in China.Journal of Arid Environments,2001,48:537～550.
[15] 　Binkley D.The influence of tree species on forest soils processes and patterns.In:Mead D J,Cornfort h I S.Proceedingsof t he Trees and Soils Workshop.New Zealand:Lincoln Universit y Press,1995.1～34.
[16] 　Condron L M,Davis M R,Newman R H,et al.Influence of conifers on t he forms of phosphorus in selected New Zealandgrassland soils.Biological Fertilit y Soils,1996,21:37～42.

卧龙自然保护区土地利用变化对土壤性质的影响

Effects of land use changes on soil properties in Wolong Nature Reserve

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	许咏梅, 周黎明, 张兆彤. 新疆昌吉州耕地开垦轨迹对土壤肥力变化的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 657-672.
[2]	邹利林, 李裕瑞, 刘彦随, 王建英. 基于要素视角的耕地“三生”功能理论建构与实证研究[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(3): 839-855.
[3]	杨帆, 何凡能, 李美娇. 中国西部地区历史草地面积重建的方法——以甘宁青新区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1667-1679.
[4]	田俊峰, 王彬燕, 程利莎, 王士君. 政策主导下的区域土地利用转型过程与机制——以中国东北地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 805-821.
[5]	王亚辉, 李秀彬, 辛良杰. 近30年来耕地养老保障功能的时空演变及政策启示[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(4): 956-969.
[6]	刘亚香, 李阳兵. 乡村转型背景下贵州坝子土地利用生产功能的空间演变[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 430-446.
[7]	李美娇, 何凡能, 杨帆, 赵亮. 明代省域耕地数量重建及时空特征分析[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(2): 447-460.
[8]	唐常春, 李亚平. 多中心城市群土地利用/覆被变化地学信息图谱研究——以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(11): 2626-2641.
[9]	丁振民,姚顺波. 区域生态敏感性评估的理论框架与模型设计——以陕西省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(8): 2085-2098.
[10]	胡守庚, 童陆亿, 龙花楼. 论土地利用转型潜力及其评价的理论框架[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(6): 1367-1377.
[11]	覃丽君, 金晓斌, 蒋宇超, 薛樵风, 成一农, 龙瀛, 杨绪红, 周寅康. 近六百年来长江三角洲地区城镇空间与城镇体系格局演变分析[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1045-1062.
[12]	李维维, 陈田, 马晓龙. 城市旅游综合体土地利用空间格局演变及驱动机制——以西安曲江为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(5): 1103-1118.
[13]	朱琳, 黎磊, 刘素, 李裕瑞. 大城市郊区村域土地利用功能演变及其对乡村振兴的启示——以成都市江家堰村为例[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(3): 535-549.
[14]	范业婷, 金晓斌, 项晓敏, 刘晶, 杨绪红, 周寅康. 江苏省土地利用功能变化及其空间格局特征[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 383-398.
[15]	苏康传, 杨庆媛, 张佰林, 张忠训. 山区农村土地利用转型与小农经济变迁耦合机理[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(2): 399-413.