旅游者服务感知、地方依恋与忠诚度——以厦门为例
作者简介:贾衍菊(1981- ),女,山东泰安人,博士,主要研究方向为旅游者行为和旅游目的地管理。E-mail: yanjujia@126.com
收稿日期: 2015-06-09
要求修回日期: 2015-10-27
网络出版日期: 2016-02-20
基金资助
国家社会科学基金项目(11BGL052)
Tourists' perception of urban service, place attachment and loyal behaviors: A case study of Xiamen
Received date: 2015-06-09
Request revised date: 2015-10-27
Online published: 2016-02-20
Copyright
旅游者忠诚度是近年来旅游学研究领域的热点话题,但以往研究忽视了旅游者情感因素对于个体行为的影响。从自我调节态度理论的视角,综合旅游者服务感知、地方依恋以及忠诚度理论,构建了忠诚度驱动因素模型。选取国内休闲旅游地——厦门进行实证分析,研究发现:① 厦门旅游者服务感知共有“接待服务感知”、“景区服务感知”和“公共服务感知”三个维度;② 公共服务感知对总体满意度的影响效应最大,其次是景区服务感知,而接待服务感知的影响并不显著;③ 总体满意度不仅直接影响忠诚度,且通过地方依恋的中介作用实现;④ 对于地方依恋的两个维度,地方依赖对忠诚度的影响效应更大。该研究结果不仅揭示了“服务感知→总体满意度→地方依恋→旅游者忠诚度”的复杂影响路径,也证实了自我调节态度理论的评价—情感响应—行为响应顺序在目的地管理层面的适用性。因此,要求旅游目的地管理者在实践中必须全面提升目的地服务质量,改善景区服务水平,注重旅游者情感体验管理,培育旅游者对目的地的依恋情感。
贾衍菊 , 林德荣 . 旅游者服务感知、地方依恋与忠诚度——以厦门为例[J]. 地理研究, 2016 , 35(2) : 390 -400 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201602015
Tourists' loyalty to destinations has been an important topic in the tourism research field recently. However, preivous studies have paid less attention to the influence of the emotional elements on tourists' behaviors. This study employs Bagozzi's self-regulation attitude theory to propose and investigate a new conceptual model to depict the relationship among destination service quality, overall satisfaction, place attachment and destination loyalty. The city of Xiamen is chosen as the study site, which is the famous coastal tourist destination in China. The results are shown as follows: (1) There are three dimensionalitities of tourists' perception of urban service, including hospitality service, attraction service and public service. (2) tourists' perception of public service has the greatest influence on saisfaction, followed by attraction service, while the influence of hospitality service on satisfaction is not significant. Especially, the convience of leisure facilities and information consultation has made greater contribution to the public service. (3) Overall satisfaction is an antecedent of tourist loyalty while partially mediating the effect of place attachment. (4) As for the two dimensions of place attachement, the influence of place dependence has greater infuence on tourists' loyal behaviors. Therefore, this study not only empirically demonstrates the path "tourists' service perception→overall satisfaction→place attachment→loyalty", but also supports the suitability to the destination field of Bagozzi's self-regulation attitude theory with regard to the appraisal, affective and behavior sequence. The findings offer important implications for the destination marketing practice. Destination managers should focus on improving destination service quality thoroughly, administrating the destination attraction effectively, paying more attention to emotion management and cultivating tourists' destination attachment.
Key words: loyalty; tourists' service perception; satisfaction; place attachment; Xiame
Tab. 1 Results of exploratory factor analysis表1 探索性因子分析结果 |
| 因子/题项 | 因子负荷 | 公因子 方差 | 均值 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 因子1 | 因子2 | 因子3 | |||
| 因子1:接待服务感知 | |||||
| A1:住宿价格合理 | 0.692 | 0.584 | 3.70 | ||
| A2:酒店服务良好 | 0.726 | 0.599 | 3.72 | ||
| A3:餐饮价格合理 | 0.762 | 0.630 | 3.55 | ||
| A4:餐饮服务良好 | 0.818 | 0.712 | 3.65 | ||
| 因子2:景区服务感知 | |||||
| B1:景区美食服务良好 | 0.632 | 0.462 | 4.22 | ||
| B2:景区游览服务良好 | 0.555 | 0.387 | 4.31 | ||
| B3:景区门票合理 | 0.788 | 0.635 | 4.14 | ||
| B4:景区卫生环境良好 | 0.711 | 0.580 | 3.86 | ||
| 因子3:公共服务感知 | |||||
| C1:外部交通便捷 | 0.840 | 0.707 | 4.08 | ||
| C2:休憩设施方便 | 0.737 | 0.625 | 4.04 | ||
| C3:公共卫生良好 | 0.675 | 0.586 | 4.04 | ||
| C4:信息咨询方便 | 0.540 | 0.417 | 3.84 | ||
| 特征值 | 4.233 | 1.423 | 1.270 | ||
| 旋转方差载入(%) | 35.273 | 11.859 | 10.582 | ||
| 旋转方差累计载入(%) | 35.273 | 47.132 | 57.714 |
注:此表只列出0.50以上的因子负荷系数。 |
Fig. 1 Research model图1 研究模型 |
Tab. 2 Results of reliability and validity analysis表2 信度和效度分析结果 |
| 变量 | 测量题项 | 标准化因子负荷 | t值 | 平均变异抽取量 | 组合信度 | 克朗巴哈α值 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 接待服务感知 | A1: 住宿价格 A2: 酒店服务 A3: 餐饮价格 A4: 餐饮服务 | 0.678 0.718 0.769 0.796 | - 11.496 11.395 11.411 | 0.550 | 0.830 | 0.838 |
| 景区服务感知 | B1: 景区美食服务 B2: 景区游览服务 B3: 景区门票 B4: 景区卫生环境 | 0.696 0.658 0.722 0.723 | - 8.819 8.419 7.985 | 0.490 | 0.794 | 0.737 |
| 公共服务感知 | C1: 外部交通 C2: 休憩设施 C3: 公共卫生 C4: 信息咨询 | 0.674 0.727 0.652 0.809 | - 8.965 8.347 8.185 | 0.516 | 0.808 | 0.734 |
| 总体满意度 | D1: 我认为此次旅游所花费的时间和精力是值得的 D2: 我认为来这里旅游是正确的选择 D3: 总体而言,我对此次旅游经历很满意 | 0.825 0.895 0.814 | - 18.702 16.738 | 0.715 | 0.882 | 0.881 |
| 地方依赖 | E1: 我喜欢厦门的休闲环境胜过其他旅游地 E2: 厦门的休闲旅游设施比其他旅游地更能满足我的要求 E3: 厦门给我的休闲旅游体验,其他旅游地无法替代 E4:厦门是最适合我休闲旅游的城市 | 0.670 0.792 0.639 0.736 | - 5.137 9.830 9.403 | 0.507 | 0.803 | 0.543 |
| 地方认同 | F1: 我很认同厦门的生活方式 F2: 我觉得自己是厦门的一部分 F3: 厦门对我来讲很特别 F4: 我非常留恋厦门 | 0.624 0.687 0.814 0.843 | - 10.161 11.237 11.364 | 0.559 | 0.833 | 0.833 |
| 忠诚度 | G1:我很有可能未来一段时间再来厦门 G2:我很有可能将厦门推荐给其他朋友 | 0.798 0.880 | - 13.670 | 0.706 | 0.827 | 0.819 |
Tab. 3 Discriminant validity and the correlations of varaiables表3 判别效度与变量相关系数 |
| 变量 | 均值 | 标准差 | 接待服 务感知 | 景区服务感知 | 公共服 务感知 | 总体满 意度 | 地方 依赖 | 地方 认同 | 目的地 忠诚度 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 接待服务感知 | 3.678 | 0.683 | 0.742 | ||||||
| 景区服务感知 | 4.157 | 0.597 | 0.505** | 0.700 | |||||
| 公共服务感知 | 4.062 | 0.571 | 0.485** | 0.435** | 0.718 | ||||
| 总体满意度 | 4.331 | 0.629 | 0.388** | 0.378** | 0.420** | 0.846 | |||
| 地方依赖 | 3.757 | 0.724 | 0.369** | 0.317** | 0.562** | 0.492** | 0.712 | ||
| 地方认同 | 3.643 | 0.751 | 0.392** | 0.361** | 0.512** | 0.502** | 0.542** | 0.748 | |
| 忠诚度 | 4.245 | 0.744 | 0.242** | 0.320** | 0.426** | 0.550** | 0.444** | 0.480** | 0.840 |
注:表格对角线上的加粗数字为对应变量的平均变异抽取量平方根,非对角线数字为变量间相关系数,“**”表示P<0.01. |
Fig. 2 Parameter estimation of the model图2 模型参数估计 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
[
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
[
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
[
|
| [28] |
[
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
[
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |