地理研究, 2023, 42(4): 1117-1129 doi: 10.11821/dlyj020220952

学术论评

可持续转型的地理视角及其分析框架优化

胡晓辉,1,2, 张旭亮3, 杨宇,4,5

1.南京师范大学地理科学学院 江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京 210023

2.浙江省城市治理研究中心,杭州 311021

3.浙江大学区域协调发展研究中心, 杭州 310058

4.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京100101

5.中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京100049

Geographical perspectives of sustainability transitions: Towards an advanced analytical framework

HU Xiaohui,1,2, ZHANG Xuliang3, YANG Yu,4,5

1. School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University / Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing, 210023, China

2. Zhejiang Urban Governance Studies Center, Hangzhou 311021, China

3. Center for Regional Coordinated Development, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

4. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling / Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

5. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, School of Resources and Environment, Beijing 100049, China

通讯作者: 杨宇(1984-),男,山东威海人,研究员,博士生导师,研究方向为经济地理与区域发展、能源地理。E-mail: yangyu@igsnrr.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2022-09-6   修回日期: 2022-12-28  

基金资助: 国家社会科学基金项目(22BJL109)

Received: 2022-09-6   Revised: 2022-12-28  

作者简介 About authors

胡晓辉(1982-),男,浙江湖州人,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为经济地理与产业动态、区域经济韧性。E-mail: huxh@njnu.edu.cn

摘要

近年来,“可持续转型”进入经济地理学研究视野,成为探索绿色技术发展动力、理解区域产业演化机制的新范式,形成了“转型地理”这一新兴脉络。然而,当前转型地理研究侧重“概念和分析框架单纯借用”的实证分析,缺乏多元视角融合,使其处于转型研究边缘位置,不利于学科自身发展。本文将转型研究中的多层次视角和技术创新系统同地理学视角下的语境敏感性、空间嵌入性和地方能动性概念相结合,构建了一套既能对接主流转型思想,又能反映经济地理学科学问题的新分析框架。该框架强调:① 区域可持续转型是一个语境-结构-能动性在多地理尺度上因果互动的演进过程;② 转型地理性主要体现在新社会-技术系统嵌入旧体制社会空间的程度、能力、方式、过程和结果差异上;③ 转型对象是具体的,也是落地的,离不开地方能动性对旧社会-技术系统要素重组的社会化作用。在此基础上,本文对优化框架进行实际应用说明,并对未来中国转型地理相关议题进行了展望。

关键词: 可持续转型; 多层次视角; 技术创新系统; 地理视角; 分析框架优化

Abstract

In recent years, the concept of “sustainability of transitions” has entered the field of economic geography, which has been applied as an important perspective to explore the spatial dynamics of green technology emergence and to understand the mechanism of regional industrial evolution. This has brought about an emerging research theme named “geographies of transitions”. However, this research theme is characterized by the strong “concepts and analytical frameworks adopting” approach specializing in empirical examinations, lacking integration of multiple perspectives. Geographies of transition studies thus have been marginalized to the mainstream transition studies, which is not in favor of geographies of transition studies. This article combines three geographical concepts, namely, contextual sensitivity, spatial embeddedness, and place-based agency, with multi-level perspective (MLP) and technological innovation system (TIS), and constructs an improved analytical framework to better explain the mechanism differences in transitions among different geographical contexts. In so doing, an updated analytical framework is formed, which not only fits the mainstream ideas of sustainability transitions, but also closely reflects economic geographical questions. This framework highlights that: (1) Regional transition is a systematic process in which context, structure and agency interplay at multiple geographical scales. (2) The geographies of transitions are about the differences in degree, capacity, pathway and process of new socio-techno systems are socially embedded in existing regimes. (3) The objects of transitions are certain, and grounded, which is strongly linked with place-based agency who promote resource alignment and institutionization on the existing social-technological systems. Based on the above, this paper also offers an empirical illustration by adopting the updated analytical framework. It finanlly puts forward several research agendas for future's geographies of transitions research in China.

Keywords: sustainability transitions; multi-level perspective (MLP); technological innovation systems (TIS); geographical perspective; analytical framework optimization

PDF (5303KB) 元数据 多维度评价 相关文章 导出 EndNote| Ris| Bibtex  收藏本文

本文引用格式

胡晓辉, 张旭亮, 杨宇. 可持续转型的地理视角及其分析框架优化[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(4): 1117-1129 doi:10.11821/dlyj020220952

HU Xiaohui, ZHANG Xuliang, YANG Yu. Geographical perspectives of sustainability transitions: Towards an advanced analytical framework[J]. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(4): 1117-1129 doi:10.11821/dlyj020220952

1. 引言

近年来,随着全球变暖、能源危机和环境压力加剧,如何推动生产和消费模式转型,如何构建可持续性的绿色发展路径已成为学界和各级政府关注的重要议题[1,2]。长期以来,学者普遍认为技术创新是实现转型的核心途径,但对技术的社会性关注不够。同时,因各地在发展阶段、特征和目标上的巨大差异,对转型概念的内涵界定存在一定模糊性。进入21世纪以来,“可持续转型”(sustainability transitions)概念被提出,“转型”是指由技术、制度、行为主体、市场和基础设施等要素组成的“社会-技术系统”(social-technical system)转型。转型目的是为了摆脱以石化能源为驱动的社会-技术系统,形成绿色、低碳和可持续的全新系统[3]

可持续转型不是多要素糅合的概念大杂烩,亦不是政策术语。经十多年发展,可持续转型研究(即转型研究)对理解国家和区域如何构建绿色技术网络、能源支持系统和消费市场,产生了积极的科学指导意义[4]。在经济地理学中,探究新技术空间演化机制已成为核心议题[5-8]。其中,演化经济地理学派(EEG)认为,新技术可诞生于“熊彼特式”突破创新,但社会-技术系统转型并非一蹴而就,而是一个多要素交互的长期复杂过程。为此,不少学者跳出广义达尔文主义和路径依赖理论,将区域可持续转型看成是一个社会-技术共演过程。认为转型不仅仅是新技术创新问题,而是涉及新社会-技术系统与旧社会-技术系统的深层次互动[9,10]

为此,转型范式为探索地方产业/经济演化提供了新思路[5,11,12]。有学者提出了“转型地理”(geography of sustainability transitions),将是继“文化”“制度”“关系”和“演化”之后的新范式[13]。该范式跳出了以往“关注区域产业(或技术)路径”视角,将区域动态联系到更系统、更多尺度的“技术-社会-语境”因果关系构建中[14-16]。然而,转型地理研究也有一定局限。比如,学者热衷借用转型概念或分析框架,直接用来解释经济地理问题,缺乏对范式适用性的深刻思考[10,17,18]。此外,受 EEG 影响,当前转型地理研究强调基于企业的“自下而上”转型机制,忽视了国家或全球层面“自上而下”作用,即对地理尺度、关系尺度和机制尺度的理解运用存在模糊性[19]

这些问题不利于实证问题分析,可能会阻碍转型在经济地理学中的范式价值。为此,本文将地理学视角下的多尺度地理语境、地方能动性和社会嵌入性三大基本概念融入到主流转型分析框架中,以此优化转型地理分析框架。在此基础上,进行了实际应用说明,并对未来相关研究进行展望。

2 转型地理研究动态与瓶颈

2.1 研究脉络:从可持续转型到转型地理

转型研究探索变革性创新如何孕育、成长和扩散,以及它取代旧技术路径的机制。特别关注绿色技术对改变旧社会-技术系统的作用,强调由市场、用户习惯、基础设施、政策、制度与文化等各个要素组成的社会-技术体制转变[3,20,21]。多层次视角(multi-level perspective,即MLP)是转型研究核心分析框架。Geels在2002年提出的利基、体制和远景概念,分别代表转型的微观创新动力(如新技术开发应用)、中观体制阻力(如旧社会-技术体制依赖)和宏观语境压力(如气候变化)[22]。其中,远景对利基和体制产生压力,产生机会窗口;利基通过机会窗口对体制产生影响,并推动其转型[23]。另一重要分析框架是技术创新系统(technological innovation system,即TIS)。TIS强调新技术所嵌入的社会系统构建[24]。TIS需有六大进程,分别是:新技术相关知识的开发与传播、新技术及其社会发展方向的引导、新技术试验的支持、新技术市场的构建、动用新技术发展的资源、以及新技术的社会环境营造[25]

经二十余年,转型研究不断发展,有效解释了各类社会-技术系统转型机制问题。尽管如此,该研究仍有不足:理论多源于欧洲经验,形成了封闭自证的知识体系,其分析框架普适性有待考证[10,11,21];过分强调行为主体和要素之间因果关联性,对两者所嵌入的地理环境缺乏重视,存在“去语境化”的特征,难以解释“转型为何在此地发生”这一问题[11,26]。部分经济地理学者逐渐意识到,转型研究需融入地理思维,并产生一些有价值思考[26,27]。比如,转型被认为是地理、制度和结构互动的结果[28]。地方新技术诞生是该技术相关资源在该地空间集聚和社会构建而成,强调用关系视角来理解其动力机制[18]。EEG学者强调区域新技术是在地方产业基础、劳动力技能和制度能力基础上演化而来,认为可持续转型也是如此,不是凭空而来,而是容易出现在技术和制度相近的地方[5]。近期,利基、体制和远景概念被赋予更多地理空间观。比如,用跨国社会联系、全球创新系统和政策迁移等视角看待利基形成的地理规律,认为地方可持续转型可能同别国的地方转型实践、政策动态和创新网络组织息息相关[29-31]。此外,更多学者就转型问题提出了若干经济地理学科学问题:如,转型为何发生此地而非它地?新技术与旧体制互动的空间机制是如何的?同一技术在不同地理语境下的诞生方式、成长过程和转型成效差异是如何形成的?随着地理概念和问题被纳入到转型研究中,转型地理研究开始受到主流转型学者的关注[5,13,17,32-34]

2.2 可持续转型与转型地理的视角差异

尽管地理概念被运用到研究中,但转型学者和地理学者对它们的理解不尽相同。表1列出了两者在“尺度”“地方”和“空间”概念上的理解差异。首先,转型研究认为尺度是分析单元,如国家、城市、区域和社区等;地理学者认为转型是多地理尺度的:行为主体、资源要素和制度支持不局限于某一地方,受到外部要素影响,如全球生产网络、国家法制架构、跨国约束性政策框架等[35-37]。其次,转型研究认为地方是指转型发生的位置;转型地理则突出地方的社会构建性:转型不仅与地方技术特征有关,还与地方社会文化属性息息相关[17,38]。此外,地方转型并不孤立,而是嵌入在各种关系和结构中,受到诸如全球生产网络、国家政策和行业制度等影响[13,39,40]。最后,在转型研究中,空间是指利基空间,为创新实验的抽象载体;转型地理则关注转型的空间差异性,认为转型机制多样性是社会空间的地理差异造成的[17,41-43]

表1   可持续转型研究和转型地理研究的地理概念理解差异

Tab. 1  The differences in geographical concepts between transitions studies and geographies of transitions

概念理解转型研究转型地理研究
尺度特定边界的抽象地域类型,或给定的分析单元。社会构建的、多主体介入的、跨多地理尺度和制度边界的动态载体。
地方涉及转型发生位置,是去语境化的。是一个重要的分析对象和单元,但却忽视地方特性。既是地理位置,又有具体内涵,指转型所涉及的个体、组织、物质、文化、历史和结构,及相互关系所形成的地方特有语境。也受宏观语境影响,如社会观念、国家政策和文化特征等。
空间新技术实验发展的保护空间或知识传播空间,多指理解转型的分析对象(如利基),不具备地理性。强调转型空间差异问题,多指不同国家和区域语境下,转型过程、社会经济和环境效益出现不同,存在不同模式。

注:作者根据文献整理。

新窗口打开| 下载CSV


3 转型地理研究的分析框架局限

转型地理也有自身范式上的局限:转型地理研究多在MLP和TIS视角上添加地理思考,缺乏理论和分析框架反思[44]。为明确转型地理分析框架问题,图1比较了MLP、TIS 和地理视角的概念特征、视角内涵和优缺点。阐述了三者在概念上的互补性。

图1

图1   转型地理三大视角的比较总结

Fig. 1   Comparison of three main perspectives on geographies of transitions


MLP提供了“微观行动-中观体制-宏观语境”三者因果互动的转型过程。其缺点在于:缺乏对语境的地理解读,忽视利基、体制和远景在多个地理尺度上的关联性。MLP常用于分析国家尺度下的转型,缺乏对城市、区域和社区尺度的关注[39,45]。这使得现有分析框架能相对普适地解释“转型如何发生”,但难以弄清“转型为何在此发生”[4,10]。TIS关注新技术扩散和发展的社会化过程。其不足在于:实证研究聚焦某地某体制转型,忽视了该体制转型与多地理尺度上其他TIS之间关系动态[46]

地理视角含3个要点:① 语境敏感性。语境与“远景”有关,强调宏观语境为转型创造“空间机会”(何地有利于转型)和“时间机会”(何时有利于转型)。语境还反映了转型所涉及的,源自各个地理尺度的社会经济要素、条件和能力特征。时空机会不是语境本身带来的,而是能动者依据语境变化,通过行动并作用于特定地域所产生的[47]。② 空间嵌入性。转型不可能全面铺开,而是具有落地性。转型是指利基及其TIS对特定地域社会空间进行嵌入的过程,比如,新技术获本地用户认可,形成本地市场[10,48]。空间嵌入性含两层意思:一是,利基和体制均嵌入在特定的地域社会系统中。二是,转型是新老社会-技术系统在某地进行社会空间融合的过程。③ 地方能动性。强调能动者在语境感知、行为能力、转型目标和方式上存在地方差异[17]。该思想聚焦区域转型过程中的地方属性和条件,是理解转型地理的核心[49,50]

4 转型地理研究的分析框架优化

4.1 视角优化和新框架构建

综上,MLP、TIS 和地理视角之间存在互补性:均重视结构和能动性对转型的作用,与地方、尺度和空间概念紧密关联[47,51,52]。MLP和TIS认为转型是一个由技术创新推动的、有历史依赖的社会过程。前者强调语境、利基和结构之间的因果关系;后者突出转型的系统能动性对新技术的社会构建。然而,前者缺乏对多尺度地理语境的深刻理解,后者则忽视地方和空间对转型对象和能动性的影响。

为此,本文将三视角融合,构建了一个优化的转型地理分析框架。该框架通过强调地理视角下的语境敏感性、空间嵌入性和地方能动性,优化了MLP视角的多地理尺度互动性和机制逻辑,且突出 TIS 下转型系统能动性的地方条件和社会空间性。远景带来语境变化,对体制、利基及其TIS产生压力(如图2中①、②和③)。体制、利基和TIS均嵌入于相应社会空间中,受到地方环境及其相关行动者的影响(如图2中④、⑤和⑥)。可见,转型地理研究的本质在于探索转型发生的地理机制和空间演化规律,是一个新技术如何克服特定旧体制所形成的社会空间阻碍和地方化问题,受到多地理尺度语境、要素、能动主体和结构的多重影响。

图2

图2   优化后的转型地理分析框架

Fig. 2   An updated analytical framework on geographies of transitions


转型地理的研究对象是具体的社会-技术系统,可以是在国家、区域、城市或社区视角下,能源、交通或某产业系统的转型。利基及其TIS构建可能并非基于本地,其涉及的行为主体、网络、资源和政策支持可以来自多个其他地理尺度。利基与体制互动有两种方式。一是,利基借助机会窗口进入特定地域的体制,通过社会空间嵌入,突破体制对利基的阻碍作用,对体制产生影响(如图2中⑦)。二是,利基逐步构建新技术所需的功能、资源、行动者网络和制度环境(如图2中⑧),形成了面向TIS构建的系统能动性(如图2中⑨),从而反过来促进利基成长(如图2中⑧)。当体制所产生的社会空间阻碍较小时,TIS也可直接影响体制(如图2中⑩)。

最后,体制发生转型并影响远景(如图2中⑪)。远景是多地理尺度的,可能包含了地方、区域和国家层面发展态势和发展目标,也可涉及国际政治联盟架构下有关发展议题(如气候政策、碳减排目标等)。体制转型过程中会向上反馈作用于远景,远景的进一步变化会继续向下影响体制、利基、TIS及其互动关系(如图2中①、②和③),从而进一步影响转型。

本分析框架有5个核心原则:① 利基是连接 MLP、TIS 和地理视角的核心要素;转型可被认为是利基及其TIS与旧体制之间的社会空间适应过程,伴随着该旧体制“解锁”和“去合法化”(以及利基合法化)过程,也是“利基-体制-远景”互动的地方化过程。② 转型能动性、体制和TIS均受到远景的影响,远景变化是激发转型能动性和时空窗口打开的重要语境因素。③ 体制、利基和TIS的发展和互动均依赖于语境敏感性、空间嵌入性和地方能动性。④ 利基可以是多地理尺度的。不管是诞生于地方的利基,还是外部引进利基,均需要对某旧体制的社会空间进行嵌入,其构建的TIS需要充分与旧社会-技术系统进行互动,产生地方制度化过程,以此来推动特定地方的可持续转型。⑤ 区域转型的研究对象多指特定地域下新旧社会-技术体系的共演过程,反映了多地理尺度下“结构”和“能动性”对特定区域体制的影响[53]。不管何种类型的地区,如要促成可持续转型,都离不开基于地方的能动性。

4.2 分析框架的实际应用说明

为了体现该框架的实际应用性,本文将其运用到解释中国“个人交通社会-技术系统”转型案例上。“电动汽车取代燃油车”就是“个人交通社会-技术系统”的可持续转型过程。根据本文构建的新分析框架,图3初步展示了个人交通体制的转型地理研究要点和分析过程。

图3

图3   中国个人交通社会-技术系统的转型地理分析框架应用图

Fig. 3   Application of the updated analytical framework of geographies of transitions on China's personal transportation social-technical system


首先,转型是指“电车体制”逐步替代“油车体制”。该转型不仅是传统产业结构(如油车产业上下游关系重构)及其产品体系的转变(如智能控制系统代替传统控制系统),还涉及基础设施(比如充电站取代加油站)、金融保险体系(比如贷款利率转变)、规制政策(电车购置税减免、绿牌通行不限制)、销售与维修(如换电服务取代维修服务)、文化观念与用户习惯(如驾驶操控习惯、娱乐生活方式等)等多个方面的转变。

其次,利基是电车技术创新和应用空间。包括了电车零部件技术创新、电池原材料技术、充电技术、智能/无人驾驶技术、车联网技术,还涉及行驶测试、市场需求、人才和制度创新等要素和行为空间。利基不单是企业行为的结果,其发展还受到远景的压力。远景压力可包括全球气候变化、双碳战略实施、全球技术创新趋势(如数字化平台、充电储能技术发展等),以及大型资本介入等。远景变化刺激电车利基的成长,促使各类行为主体、要素和资源向电车行业集聚,形成面向电车转型的系统能动性,以此嵌入并影响油车体制,推动其转型。在中国,这种能动性不仅包含“蔚来”“小鹏”“理想”等电车新势力,还来自于油车企业(通过“油改电”或发展全新电车品牌来介入利基);同时,还涉及上下游企业(如锂电池、零部件、电子设备和芯片制造商等),以及政府、行业组织和风险资本所形成的集体行为。这些行为推动了电车TIS构建,包含企业创新创业、对电车进行知识开发、传播和愿景引导(比如,相比油车,电车低成本、可降碳和更智能,符合未来个人出行大趋势等)、智能驾驶等技术网络形成、充电站等基础设施建设,以及绿牌补贴等政策出台等。如图3所示,利基同时嵌入在“油车体制”和“电车TIS”中,形成了相互嵌套的竞争共演关系。从中国实际情况来说,油车企业已经介入利基,说明了电车利基已经形成了TIS,有效地嵌入到传统油车体制中。

最后,是转型地理研究的核心要点部分。① 远景释放出“自上而下”的转型压力,但并非所有地方都对“发展电车”产生语境敏感。一是,不同地方在产业结构、人才基础、资源条件、发展目标和政府能动性等方面存在差异;二是,企业家和资本会从电车相关产业链基础、供应链成本和市场潜力特征出发,对电车技术研发、生产测试和市场投放有差异性的区位选择。比如,蔚来之于合肥、特斯拉之于上海浦东,这些电车利基是多地理尺度能动者(企业家、官员等)对语境(宏观语境机会、地方特有的比较优势/能力)互动选择匹配的理性结果。② 电车利基发展是落地的,其成长和扩散更多依赖于基于地方的TIS构建过程。比如,杭州推出的“绿牌免摇号免限行”“绿牌停车优惠”等政策,使得消费者从成本和收益角度出发,更容易接受电车;又如,不少城市实施的电车的士采购政策,创造了保护性利基市场;再如,南京江心洲对车联网基础设施的投入,使得电车无人驾驶技术测试落地,产生了积极示范效应。这些案例说明利基成长和地方密切相关,转型是由地方构建推动的——即地方特有的社会空间与利基及其TIS的互动。③ 油车体制不是一个去语境化的转型对象,其不同程度地嵌入在地域社会空间中。油车体制和电车体制在技术上存在关联和重叠,但在社会系统上存在高度差异。在不同地域社会空间中,转型方式、机制和效应存在不同。比如,有些地方形成了绿色发展理念和相关制度保障(如海南推出的2025年燃油车退出市场政策),其油车体制就相对脆弱,电车利基就更容易嵌入发展,转型就在这些地方更激进快速;有些地方(如上海、沈阳等)因长期积累了车辆相关产业、技术、人才和市场的比较优势,油车体制和电车体制均适合发展,那么转型在这些地方就会更加漫长艰难。由此可见,转型的关键不是技术突破或运用,而是一个对地理语境敏感的多尺度社会空间适应过程。

5 结论与展望

5.1 结论

在全球政治经济和气候环境系统剧烈变化的当下,中国也正面临百年未有之大变局。特别是在“双碳”目标压力下,如何推动区域绿色技术创新及其相应社会体系建设,如何理解可持续转型的空间机制,如何“因地制宜”地推行地方转型试点政策,是当前经济地理学者面临的重要课题[54]。然而,转型研究多聚焦欧洲,其分析框架存在局限性。此外,因经济地理学者热衷于借用转型分析框架来直接探究实证问题,缺乏足够理论反思。可持续转型研究和转型地理在理论思想上缺乏共识,不利于转型地理研究的长久发展和学科地位[18]

基于此,本文将转型研究中的多层次视角(MLP)与技术创新系统(TIS)同地理学视角下的语境敏感性、空间嵌入性和地方能动性概念相结合,以此构建一套转型地理研究新分析框架。MLP、TIS和地理学视角的互补性有两点:① 强调转型发生的“地理语境-利基-体制”的因果关联性[34];TIS 突出新技术成长和扩散是一个异质社会空间嵌入过程,该过程是落地的,涉及基于地方的系统能动性和体制转型[55]。② 地理视角可为MLP和TIS赋予地方、尺度和空间概念,揭示转型地理过程和逻辑。本文所提出的新分析框架提供了一种用于回答转型动力过程、机制和结果上的空间差异性问题。相比MLP和TIS框架,该框架能让研究更加聚焦多尺度-多过程-多主体介入的地方社会-技术体制,并将转型地理性理解为:多地理尺度嵌入下的“语境、能动性和结构”三者互动关系如何在特定地方形成和发展,以及地方能动性是如何参与这种互动关系,并如何逐步形成区域可持续转型过程、机制和效应。

当前,中国转型地理研究还处在理论框架介绍的初期阶段。部分国内地理学者意识到中国具有自身特殊的可持续转型背景条件和发展逻辑,西方转型理论假设存在一定局限:① 中央政府在特定利基发展阶段(如新能源汽车行业、高铁技术、无人驾驶技术、数字化平台、行业标准化等)发挥重要作用。比如,政策补贴、国企行为、行政规制、以及双碳和生态文明试点建设等能加速利基的地方试点和构建[6,56-58]。② 地方社会语境对新技术应用和传播具有特殊作用。比如,有研究指出人际关系网络对新技术空间嵌入和传播起决定性作用,不同地方在地缘、亲缘、血缘、组织、文化和政治临近上均有不同属性的表现,使得绿色创新活动的动力机制会有地方显著差异[8]。③ 强调能动性的两面性作用。中国的能动性具有多元表现形式,不仅包含了地方企业(政府)领导力[59],市场企业家精神[60]、政企战略联盟[6]、跨国公司技术网络构建者[61]、乡贤熟人和城乡两栖企业家网络等[10]。同时,中国的能动性受到“创新”和“守旧”正反两面压力,存在转型积极性和惰性共存现象。比如,当前新能源车所存在的“里程焦虑”“自燃自爆、自动驾驶失控”“充电难”“保险较油车贵”等负面知识被广泛传播和放大,这体现了利基本身的不稳定性和脆弱性,同时也反映了油车体制(如石油价格系统、市场动态和技术创新等)对电车技术-社会系统发展的阻力能动性。此外,因不少传统社会-技术路径(比如煤电产业等)构建时间晚于西方,其市场需求所带来的报酬递增和增值效应仍旧明显,使得其转型具一定阻力;另一方面,因国家政策导向、市场活力和技术应用的飞速发展,使得中国转型又具有更多的绿色机会窗口,特别是对于传统体制尚未成熟的地区,更容易发展利基空间[62]

5.2 展望

基于本文研究结论,展望中国转型地理未来发展的3个研究方向:

(1)重视国家社会-制度语境的特殊性,以此作为区域可持续转型的研究起点。中国政府与市场关系、劳资关系、央地关系、社会治理模式、市场模式等与西方存在显著差异[63]。诸如,重视官本位、人际关系和政府决策会从根本上影响人们对转型技术选择和发展方向的理解,产生与其他国家不一样的转型路径、目标和机制[40,63]。此外,以地缘关系和地缘政治的视角去看待远景压力,重视可持续转型的国际语境、关系动态和动力机制,以此向下理解利基创新的根本逻辑和空间规律。

(2)中国转型地理研究应重视人的能动性。一方面,中国不少社会-技术系统构建历史较短,其社会支持体系尚未如西方国家那么成熟,影响转型的体制阻力可能较小,能动性作用则可能更大。未来研究可从地方领导力、制度和企业家精神等多个主体出发,比较不同语境下系统能动性是如何形成的、又是如何影响绿色技术在特定地域发展、扩散和社会嵌入的[4,10,11]

(3)研究与国家政策需求相联系。在“双碳”目标下,对绿色交通系统、新能源生产/消费系统、老工业区重构和低碳园区转型研究具有深刻意义。同时,对农村、欠发达地区或特殊类型地区(工矿城市、资源型城市、边远山区、民族地区、沿海岛屿、环境污染严重地区等)社会-技术转型给予重视,对这些地区转型涉及的文化、宗教、技术和日常生活等要素给予更多地理意义。比如,探索为什么新能源电池产业能够在浙江长兴、福建宁德等三线城市发展崛起,为什么电车能够在广西柳州形成本地市场等问题;解释可再生能源富集区如何发展绿色技术(如风能、太阳能和生物能)并得以推动区域可持续转型;聚焦环境脆弱地区、能源短缺区和生态功能区等敏感地区,分析其转型的绿色机会窗口创造机制及其能动性作用,关注这些转型过程中的环境正义和社会公正问题等[64]。此外,增加对转型成功和失败的案例比较研究,为转型地理的理论化提供中国经验和支撑证据[15,40,65]

致谢

真诚感谢匿名评审专家在论文评审中所付出的时间和精力,专家对本文理论框架研究思路、视角融合建议、实际案例说明、结论梳理方面的修改意见,使本文获益匪浅。

参考文献

Coenen L, Hansen T, Glasmeier A, et al.

Regional foundations of energy transitions

Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2021, 14(2): 1-15. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsab010.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Due to a spatial turn in the socio-technical transition literature, the geography of energy transitions has recently been taken increasingly seriously, leading to burgeoning research output on regional energy transitions since early 2010. Amidst this wealth of publications, however, it can be difficult to keep track of its diverse and constantly evolving landscape. This editorial therefore aims at developing a framework that allows for bringing multiple approaches to regional energy transitions into conversation with each other and that helps to understand and explain the complexity of these interdependencies in ways that go beyond observing regional variety in energy transitions.

He C F, Mao X Y.

Environmental Economic Geography in China

Singapore: Springer, 2020: 1-20. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-8991-1.

[本文引用: 1]

Köhler J, Geels F W, Kern F, et al.

An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2019, 31: 1-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

余振, 龚惠文, 胡晓辉.

可持续性转型地理研究综述与展望

地理科学进展, 2021, 40(3): 498-510.

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.013      [本文引用: 3]

可持续性转型是近20 a欧洲学界的新兴研究领域,它关注既有社会技术系统向更加可持续的生产与消费模式的根本性转变,对不少国家和地区的绿色转型政策实践已经产生了重要的影响。近年来,越来越多学者开始关注可持续性转型与经济地理的交叉融合,可持续性转型地理逐渐发展成为一个新兴的研究议题,着重从空间根植性与多尺度交互2个维度回答“可持续性转型在哪里发生”的问题。论文在简要总结可持续转型理论与分析框架的基础上,系统回顾和评述了转型地理研究进展与不足,并着重从中国的情境提出未来该议题的几个重点方向:① 基于中国语境下的的转型地理概念化和理论框架构建;② 后发地区可持续性转型与绿色产业追赶;③ 城市可持续性转型差异与联系;④ 多尺度交互下转型主体能动性与权力博弈;⑤ 人工智能等新兴技术对可持续转型的影响。

[ Yu Zhen, Gong Huiwen, Hu Xiaohui.

Geography of sustainability transitions: A sympathetic critique and research agenda

Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(3): 498- 510.] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2021.03.013.

[本文引用: 3]

Sustainability transitions focus on the fundamental transformation of the existing socio-technical system towards a more sustainable mode of production and consumption. Emerged in Europe two decades ago, this new research field has already exerted impacts on the green transition policy practices of many countries and regions. In recent years, transition studies have increasingly taken geography into account, resulting in a new paradigm of geography of sustainability transitions. This emerging paradigm focuses on the role of spatial embeddedness and multi-scalar interactions in explaining where transitions take place. This article provides a critical overview of the development in the geography of sustainability transitions research, and suggests five promising avenues for future transition research in the Chinese context: 1) to develop concepts and theorize from the Chinese context; 2) to link sustainability transitions with latecomer regions' industry catch-up; 3) to compare the sustainability transitions in cities with different leading industries; 4) to pay more attention to the role of local agency through the lens of multi-scalar interactions; and 5) to explore the impact of digitalization and artificial intelligence on sustainability transitions.

Boschma R, Coenen L, Frenken K, et al.

Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies

Regional Studies, 2017, 51(1): 31-45. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460.

URL     [本文引用: 4]

贺灿飞, 李伟.

演化经济地理学与区域发展

区域经济评论, 2020(1): 39-54.

[本文引用: 3]

[ He Canfei, Li Wei.

Evolutionary economic geography and regional development

Regional Economic Review, 2020(1): 39-54.] DOI: 10.14017/j.cnki.2095-5766.2020.0006.

[本文引用: 3]

朱晟君, 黄永源, 胡晓辉.

多尺度视角下的产业价值链与空间升级研究框架与展望

地理科学进展, 2020, 39(8): 1367-1384.

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.08.011      [本文引用: 1]

改革开放以来,在出口导向的产业发展模式驱动下,中国积极加入全球化进程并快速实现产业升级。进入21世纪后,在面临成本上升和制度环境变化等诸多危机和挑战的情况下,中国制造业开始了新一轮的产业升级。这从根本上重塑了产业组织和空间结构,改变着中国制造业在地方、区域乃至全球出口市场中的角色功能和影响力。基于文献分析,论文将产业升级划分为价值链升级和空间升级2种模式,并分别从全球、国家、区域、地方、企业等多尺度视角下探讨了中国产业升级的机制及其影响,得出以下主要结论:① 价值链升级和空间升级现象相互依赖、相互作用,是产业升级的2个侧面,综合两者的分析框架能更全面地反映中国产业升级的现状;② 中国产业在升级模式上体现了复杂多样性,已有研究关注的产业升级模式较为单一,未来应更加关注中国产业升级路径和方式的非线性、复杂性和多元性特征;③ 中国产业升级是由全球、国家、区域、地方、企业等多重尺度力量相互耦合下共同驱动的,透过多元地理尺度融合的分析框架解读产业价值链升级和空间升级机制,才能更好地理解中国产业的发展和赶超之路。

[ Zhu Shengjun, Huang Yongyuan, Hu Xiaohui.

Research framework and prospect of industrial value chain upgrading and spatial upgrading based on a multiple scale perspective

Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(8): 1367-1384.] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2020.08.011.

[本文引用: 1]

Since the implementation of the reform and opening up policy, driven by the export-oriented developmental pattern, China has deeply joined the globalization process and quickly realized industrial upgrading. However, since the beginning of the twenty-first century, China's manufacturing industry has faced many crises and challenges such as rising costs and institutional changes. In response to these challenges, China's manufacturing industry has begun a new round of industrial upgrading, which fundamentally reshapes the industrial space and organizational structure of the manufacturing industry, changing the function, role, and influence of China's manufacturing in regional and global export markets. Focusing on industrial upgrading, this article first reviewed the research on industrial upgrading pattern, and divided it into industrial value chain upgrading and spatial upgrading. Then, it examined the industrial upgrading mechanism from multiple scales: global, national, regional, local, and enterprise, and drew the following main conclusions: 1) Value chain upgrading and spatial upgrading are two sides of industrial upgrading. Value chain upgrading focuses on organizational restructuring, and spatial upgrading emphasizes geographical restructuring. Spatial upgrading has four types: localization, delocalization, relocalization, and regionalization, which are coupling and interacting with value chain upgrading. An analysis framework combining both can comprehensively reflect the status of industrial upgrading in China. 2) Considering the complex and diverse upgrading phenomena in China, the existing literature on industrial upgrading pattern is relatively simple, and it is necessary to pay more attention to the cross-upgrading path and the non-linear, complex, and diverse nature of China's industrial upgrading in the future. 3) China's industrial upgrading process is driven by the forces from multiple scales of global, national, regional, local, and enterprise. We propose a multi-scale integration perspective that abandons single-perspective, top-down, and hierarchical ways of thinking. Using the multi-scale analysis framework to investigate the upgrading mechanisms can help us to better understand the development and the catching up path of China's industry.

赵建吉, 王艳华, 苗长虹.

区域新兴产业形成机理: 演化经济地理学的视角

经济地理, 2019, 39(6): 36-45.

[本文引用: 2]

[ Zhao Jianji, Wang Yanhua, Miao Changhong.

Formation mechanism of new emerging industry: From the perspective of evolutionary economic geography

Economic Geography, 2019, 49(6): 36-45.] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.06.005.

[本文引用: 2]

Binz C, Truffer B, Li L, et al.

Conceptualizing leapfrogging with spatially coupled innovation systems: The case of onsite wastewater treatment in China

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2012, 79(1): 155-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.016.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

胡晓辉, 董柯.

可持续性转型研究动态与经济地理学展望

地理研究, 2022, 41(1): 18-33.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj020210442      [本文引用: 7]

近年来,可持续性转型概念进入经济地理学者视野,用于探究区域绿色技术、消费市场和产业转型的多维因果过程与空间动力机制,已成为演化经济地理学和环境经济地理学新兴议题之一。为掌握该研究动态,本文对2000—2020年来共计2453篇可持续性转型文献进行回顾,重点探讨了转型地理研究进展和理论不足,阐述了经济地理学对可持续性转型研究的理论价值和融入方向。本文发现:① 可持续性转型是创新研究和可持续管理领域热门议题,呈多学科介入特点;其中,转型地理研究正不断崛起,并聚焦区域绿色新兴产业发展的社会-技术共演过程、多尺度动力机制、环境经济和社会效应及其转型地理性等问题。② 经济地理学对转型研究有三个视角优势:时空语境敏感性;转型过程、机制和结果的空间多样性;新产业系统的地方嵌入及其合法化的地理性。③ 经济地理学对可持续性转型研究含三个提升方向:概念内涵深化(含地方、尺度和空间)、多范式互动融合(演化、制度和政治经济地理)、分析框架构建方向(多地理尺度性与多层次视角,区域创新系统与技术创新系统)。④ 中国转型地理研究在三个议题上有广阔前景:基于国家语境敏感的地方转型探索、绿色利基发展与转型空间机制研究、以及区域新产业路径发展与转型研究。

[ Hu Xiaohui, Dong Ke.

A review on sustainability transitions and its research agendas in economic geography

Geographical Research, 2022, 41(1):18-33.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020210442.

[本文引用: 7]

In recent years, the concept of sustainability transitions and its related research have increasingly drawn attention from economic geographers. Sustainability transitions studies aim to investigate the multi-scalar causality of mechanisms and spatial dynamics on how regional green technologies, consuming markets and industrial transformations emerge and develop over time. This research strand has become one of the emerging topics in both evolutionary economic geography and environmental economic geography. To better capture the progress of sustainability transitions studies, this paper conducts a bibliometrics-based literature review based on 2453 articles in the field during the past two decades. Besides, through an in-depth critical review on geographies of transitions, this paper identifies several key theoretical problems and shortcomings in the geographies of transitions literature. It has addressed the theoretical merits and value of economic geography for improving sustainability transitions studies. The findings of the paper are: (1) As one of the most promising research themes in innovation studies, sustainability management and environment science, sustainability transition studies have been increasingly disciplinarily pluralistic. The economic geographical research on sustainability transitions, in particular, focuses on three key research topics, including the co-evolution mechanisms between technologies and societies in regional new green industrial path development, multi-scalar driving forces and agency-structure interactive mechanisms of sustainability transitions, the role of transitions in shaping environmental economic and socio-spatial impacts, and the varieties of transition mechanisms. (2) There are in general three perspective advantages of economic geography for transitions studies that can be identified, namely, spatio-temporal sensitivity, spatial varieties of transition mechanisms, processes and impacts/outcomes, and place embeddedness of new socio-technical regimes in industrial systems and its geographies of legitimation. (3) Three orientations for economic geography to enhancing transitions studies are identified: deepening of geographical concepts (including place, scale and space), interactions and integrations with different approaches in economic geography (namely, transitions with evolutionary, institutional, and geographical political economy), and construction avenues for comprehensive analytical frameworks (integration of geographically multi-scalar perspective with multi-level perspectives, and that of regional innovation systems perspective with the approach of technological innovation systems. (4) Three promising research agendas on geographies of transitions in China are proposed, namely, localized transitions research by incorporating the role of Chinese-specific national contexts, green niche development and spatial mechanisms of its transitions, and regional new industrial path development and its related transition studies.

胡晓辉, 朱晟君,Robert Hassink.

超越“演化”: 老工业区重构研究进展与范式反思

地理研究, 2020, 39(5): 1028-1044.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj020190993      [本文引用: 4]

老工业区重构是经济地理学的重要研究议题。在全球化步伐放缓和全球制造业下行的宏观背景下,老工业区已愈来愈成为各国发展战略制定的核心对象。对近十年有关老工业区重构的中外文献进行细致梳理,指出了当下研究存在范式应用多元化的趋势,但这些范式在概念使用、尺度聚焦、时空侧重和机制解释上存在显著差异,缺乏相互融合和优势互补,面临现实应用瓶颈。特别是,长期用于解释老工业区重构的演化经济地理学,因其忽视多尺度-多主体-多分析单元的能动性作用而难以有效解释重构过程、机制、结果及其背后的地理性。本文将转型研究中的多层次视角同演化范式相结合,提供了一种具备上下因果辩证解释力的多尺度分析框架,能有效解释老工业区重构问题。在此基础上,探讨了未来研究方向。

[ Hu Xiaohui, Zhu Shengjun, Robert Hassink.

Beyond the “evolutionary approach”: A critical review and paradigmatic reflections on the restructuring of old industrial areas

Geographical Research, 2020, 39(5): 1028-1044.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020190993.

[本文引用: 4]

The restructuring of old industrial areas is one of the most important research topics in economic geography. In the macro context of the slowdown of globalization and the worldwide decrease of manufacturing production and demand, old industrial areas as typical problem regions have increasingly become a core target in national development strategies among many countries. Drawing upon an in-depth critical review of recent literature on the restructuring of old industrial areas in the past decade, this paper addresses the growing trend of variegated adoptions of paradigms in the research including four key approaches, namely, evolutionary economic geography, relational economic geography, institutional economic geography and geographical political economy. It also stresses that the gaps yet comparative merits in conceptual thinking, scale focus, tempo-spatial sensitivity and mechanism/process explanation among these paradigms have not generated enough intellectual interplays and complementation, but rather, have led to paradigmatic fragmentation and even repellence with each other. Despite the diversification in paradigmatic use for research, the increase of “fragmented” rather than “engaged pluralism” potentially hinders the explanatory power of existing theories and approaches in empirical research. In particular, we argue that evolutionary economic geography, arguably the most popular paradigm used in explaining and understanding the restructuring of old industrial areas, clearly suffers from a neglect of the role of multi-scalar and multi-actor agencies and a lack of multiple units of analysis in affecting the restructuring processes, mechanisms, outcomes and their geographies of old industrial areas. Given this, the paper integrates the multi-level perspective (MPL) in sustainability transition studies into the evolutionary economic geography approach. It builds up a multi-scalar analytical framework incorporating analyses of both downward and upward causation with different geographical scales, in which the interplay of micro-level change agency-based niche, meso-level regional path developmental regime and macro-level political-economic context landscape is positioned as the core for analyzing the restructuring of old industrial areas. This comprehensive multi-scalar framework is able to offer a better understanding of the restructuring of old industrial areas. Based on that, we further suggest several key orientations and agendas for future research on the topic.

Njøs R, Sjøtun S G, Jakobsen S E, et al.

Expanding analyses of path creation: Interconnections between territory and technology

Economic Geography, 2020, 96(3): 266-288. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1756768.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Truffer B, Murphy J, Raven R.

The geography of sustainability transitions: Contours of an emerging theme

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17: 63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001.

URL     [本文引用: 3]

Heiberg J, Binz C, Truffer B.

The geography of technology legitimation: How multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries

Economic Geography, 2020, 96(5): 470-498. DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Murphy J.

Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: Promising intersections

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17(12): 73-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.002.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Matschoss K, Repo P.

Forward-looking network analysis of ongoing sustainability transitions

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 161: 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120288.

[本文引用: 1]

Hansen T, Coenen L.

The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 17(12): 92-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001.

URL     [本文引用: 5]

Binz C, Coenen L, Murphy J T, et al.

Geographies of transition: From topical concerns to theoretical engagement: A comment on the transitions research agenda

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2020, 34: 1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002.

URL     [本文引用: 3]

Fuenfschilling L, Truffer B.

The structuration of socio technical regimes: Conceptual foundations from institutional theory

Research Policy, 2014, 43(4): 772-791. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Prellr B, Affolderbach J, Schulz C, et al.

Interactive knowledge generation in urban green building transitions

The Professsional Geographer, 2017, 69(2):214-224. DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1208104.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B.

Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects

Research Policy, 2012, 41(6): 955-967. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Geels F W.

Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study

Research Policy, 2002, 31(8): 1257-1274. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Geels F W, Schot J.

Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways

Research Policy, 2007, 36(3): 399-417. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Bergek A, Hekkert M, Jacobsson S, et al.

Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015, 16:51-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, et al.

Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis

Research Policy, 2008, 37(3): 407-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Lawhon M, Murphy J T.

Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology

Progress in Human Geography, 2012, 36(3): 354-378. DOI: 10.1177/0309132511427960.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Sustainability is increasingly becoming a core focus of geography, linking subfields such as urban, economic, and political ecology, yet strategies for achieving this goal remain illusive. Socio-technical transition theorists have made important contributions to our knowledge of the challenges and possibilities for achieving more sustainable societies, but this body of work generally lacks consideration of the influences of geography and power relations as forces shaping sustainability initiatives in practice. This paper assesses the significance for geographers interested in understanding the space, time, and scalar characteristics of sustainable development of one major strand of socio-technical transition theory, the multi-level perspective on socio-technical regime transitions. We describe the socio-technical transition approach, identify four major limitations facing it, show how insights from geographers – particularly political ecologists – can help address these challenges, and briefly examine a case study (GMO and food production) showing how a refined transition framework can improve our understanding of the social, political, and spatial dynamics that shape the prospects for more just and environmentally sustainable forms of development.

Pugh R, Dubois A.

Peripheries within economic geography: Four “problems” and the road ahead of us.

Journal of Rural Studies, 2021, 87: 267-275. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.007.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Ayrapetyan D, Befort N, Hermans F.

The role of sustainability in the emergence and evolution of bioeconomy clusters: An application of a multiscalar framework

Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 376: 134306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134306.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Binz C, Truffer B.

Global innovation systems: A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts

Research Policy, 2017, 64(7): 1284-1298. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012.

[本文引用: 1]

Wieczorek A J, Raven R, Berkhout F.

Transnational linkages in sustainability experiments: A typology and the case of solar photovoltaic energy in India

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015(17): 149-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.01.001.

[本文引用: 1]

Coenen L, Hansen T, Glasmeier A, et al.

Regional foundations of energy transitions

Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2021, 14(2): 219-233. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsab010.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Due to a spatial turn in the socio-technical transition literature, the geography of energy transitions has recently been taken increasingly seriously, leading to burgeoning research output on regional energy transitions since early 2010. Amidst this wealth of publications, however, it can be difficult to keep track of its diverse and constantly evolving landscape. This editorial therefore aims at developing a framework that allows for bringing multiple approaches to regional energy transitions into conversation with each other and that helps to understand and explain the complexity of these interdependencies in ways that go beyond observing regional variety in energy transitions.

Bridge G, Gailing L.

New energy spaces: Towards a geographical political economy of energy transition

Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2020, 52(6): 1037-1050. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X20939570.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Mans U.

Tracking geographies of sustainability transitions: Relational and territorial aspects of urban policies in Casablanca and Cape Town

Geoforum, 2014, 57(11): 150-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.018.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Raven R, Schot J, Berkhout F.

Space and scale in sociotechnical transitions

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2012, 4: 63-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Bauer F, Fuenfschilling L.

Local initiatives and global regimes-multi-scalar transition dynamics in the chemical industry

Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 216: 172-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.140.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Miörner J, Binz C.

Towards a multi-scalar perspective on transition trajectories

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 2021, 40: 172-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2021.06.004.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

MacKinnon D, Karlsen A, Dawley S, et al.

Legitimation, institutional path and regional path creation: A cross-national study of offshore wind

Regional Studies, 2022, 56(4): 644-655. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1861239.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Scott C A, Pierce S A, Pasqualetti M J, et al.

Policy and institutional dimensions of the water: Energy nexus

Energy Policy, 2011, 39(10): 6622-6630. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.013.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Coenen L, Truffer B.

Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: Geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field

European Planning Studies, 2012, 20(3): 367-374. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.651802.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Yu Z, Gibbs D.

Social ties, homophily and heterophily in urban sustainability transitions: User practices and solar water heater diffusion in China

Energy Research & Social Science, 2018b, 46(12): 236-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.029.

[本文引用: 3]

Van Weilie M J, Cherunya P C, Truffer B, et al.

Analysing transition pathways in developing cities: The case of Nairobi's splintered sanitation regime

Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 137: 259-271. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.059.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Veldhuizen C.

Smart specialisation as a transition management framework: Driving sustainability-focused regional innovation policy?

Research Policy, 2020, 49(6): 103982. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103982.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Grillitsch M, Asheim B, Nielsen H.

Temporality of agency in regional development

European Urban and Regional Studies, 2022, 29(1): 107-125. DOI: 10.1177/09697764211028884.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

The temporality of agency plays a fundamental role in regional development but has received little attention in economic geography and regional studies. This paper zooms in on two aspects of temporality: the temporality of intentions and the temporality of consequences. The former refers to actors’ perception and valuation of opportunities in the near and distant future, whereas the latter refers to the short- and long-term consequences of actions. This paper studies the temporality of agency in the context of regional development. It investigates how short- and long-term intentions motivate different types of agency, how different types of agency affect short- and long-term regional development outcomes and which conditions enable or constrain different types of agency. We illustrate our arguments with an in-depth case study covering the regional development of a labour market in Norway over the last 20 years.

Binz C, Truffer B, Coenen L.

Why space matters in technological innovation systems: Mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology

Research Policy, 2014, 43(1): 138-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Esmailzadeh M, Noori S, Nouralizadeh H, et al.

Investigating macro factors affecting the technological innovation system (TIS): A case study of Iran's photovoltaic TIS

Energy Strategy Reviews, 2020, 32: 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100577.

[本文引用: 1]

Weber K M, Rohracher H.

Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive 'failures' framework

Research Policy, 2012, 41(6): 1037-1047. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Bridge G, Bouzarovski S, Bradshaw M, et al.

Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy

Energy Policy, 2013, 53:331-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

Lukkarinen J, Berg A, Salo M.

An intermediary approach to technological innovation systems (TIS): The case of the cleantech sector in Finland

Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2018, 26:136-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2017.04.003.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Grillitsch M, Sotarauta M.

Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces

Progress in human geography, 2020, 44(4): 704-723. DOI: 10.1177/0309132519853870.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

The study of regional growth paths is a key theme in economic geography and of elemental interest for regional development. This paper addresses the interplay between path-dependent, structural forces and the construction and utilization of opportunities through agentic processes. Extending the evolutionary framework, it is argued that not only history but also perceived futures influence agentic processes in the present and thus shape regional development paths. The paper discusses the relevance and interdependencies of three types of agency with distinct theoretical roots, namely Schumpeterian innovative entrepreneurship, institutional entrepreneurship and place-based leadership, as main drivers of regional structural change.

Yu Z, Gibbs D.

Unravelling the role of green entrepreneurs in urban sustainability transitions: A case study of China's Solar City

Urban Studies, 2020, 57(14): 2901-2917. DOI: 10.1177/0042098019888144.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

This paper aims to understand the role of green entrepreneurs in urban sustainability transitions. We propose an analytical framework combining transition approaches and green entrepreneurship from a relational lens. It includes four processes: emergence of green entrepreneurs, multi-scalar interest coordination, empowering through anchoring, and struggling with the regime at the urban scale. This framework is illustrated through an empirical analysis of the role of green entrepreneurs in the development of the solar water heater industry in China’s Solar City. The analysis unravels how the local institutional contexts and multi-scalar relations empowered local green entrepreneurs to become system builders for urban transitions.

Coenen L, Benneworth P, Truffer B.

Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions

Research Policy, 2012, 41 (6):968-979. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

Fastenrath S, Braun B.

Sustainability transition pathways in the building sector: Energy-efficient building in Freiburg

(Germany). Applied Geography, 2018, 90: 339-349. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.004.

[本文引用: 1]

Hoicka C E, Conroy J, Berka A L.

Reconfiguring actors and infrastructure in city renewable energy transitions: A regional perspective

Energy Policy, 2021, 158: 112544. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112544.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

贺灿飞, 毛熙彦, 彭建.

环境经济地理研究的理论演进与展望

经济地理, 2021, 41(10): 70-78.

[本文引用: 1]

[ He Canfei, Mao Xiyan, Peng Jian.

Theoretical thinking in environmental economic geography: Evolution and prospects

Economic Geography, 2021, 41(10): 70-78.] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.10.008.

[本文引用: 1]

Planko J, Cramer J M, Chappin M M H, et al.

Strategic collective system building to commercialize sustainability innovations

Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112(4): 2328-2341. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.108.

URL     [本文引用: 1]

金璐璐, 贺灿飞, 周沂, .

中国区域产业结构演化的路径突破

地理科学进展, 2017, 36(8): 974-985.

DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.08.006      [本文引用: 1]

在经济转型新阶段,如何突破已有资源条件的束缚,创造新的产业发展路径是区域经济增长的突破口。路径依赖和路径突破是区域创造产业发展路径的两种途径,已有演化经济地理学研究证实区域生产结构的演化依赖地区已有生产能力,是一种路径依赖的结果,而谁是突破区域现有生产能力实现新路径创造的开拓者却尚未得知。本文基于1999-2012年中国337个地级城市的424个四位数产业数据,沿用Hidalgo等人对生产能力的定义,研究中国产业演化过程中路径突破的可能,结果发现:地区新产业的进入以及已有产业的退出有助于地区突破对原有生产结构的依赖,是区域产业发展新路径的创造者。政府补贴一方面有利于地区现有生产能力的提升,增强地区路径依赖趋势;另一方面可为地区带来新的路径,实现路径突破并为区域创造新的发展机会。此外,政府补贴影响产业演化路径选择的效用受地方财政能力限制,并在空间上存在显著差异。

[ Jin Lulu, He Canfei, Zhou Yi, et al.

Path creation in China's industrial evolution

Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(8): 974-985.] DOI: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2017.08.006.

[本文引用: 1]

In evolutionary economics, the notion of path creation has attracted much attention in recent years. Previous research has expounded the possibility of path dependence and path creation in the process of regional industrial evolution, but it remains unknown that who changes the existing production capacity and accomplishes path creation. This article focuses on regional production capacity, and applies the indicator of density defined by Hidalgo. Based on the data of 424 four-digit industry of 337 prefecture-level cities in China from 1999 to 2012, this article discusses the path creation of China's industrial evolution. It is found that the entry and exit of an industry would break the original production structure of a region and become the creator of a new path. Governmental subsidies, on the one hand, can promote the development of a region's existing production capacity to enhance the regional's path dependence trend, but also can influence industry dynamics and accelerate the process of path creation. The selection of evolutionary path has significant regional differences. This study will help deepen the understanding of the change of China's industrial structure and its regional differentiation, and provides new evidence from developing countries for the development of evolutionary economic geography.

贺灿飞.

区域产业发展演化: 路径依赖还是路径创造?

地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1253-1267.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj201807001      [本文引用: 1]

区域发展是区域产业不断演化、转型与升级的过程。近年来发展起来的演化经济地理学旨在通过分析企业进入、成长、衰退和退出等动态过程阐释企业、产业、集群、网络、城市和区域的空间演化,认为区域产业发展演化遵循路径依赖,并决定于产业技术关联。然而路径依赖式演化理论过于强调内生发展过程,忽视了外生因素和制度变革带来的路径创造机会。中国处于经济转型时期,区域产业结构变动剧烈。技术关联推动了区域产业演化,显示中国区域产业演化具有路径依赖性,同时市场化、全球化和分权化的经济转型过程为区域产业发展创造了新路径。外部联系、制度安排、行为主体的战略性行为等促进了路径创造。

[ He Canfei.

Regional industrial development and evolution: Path dependence or path creation?

Geographical Research, 2018, 37(7): 1253-1267.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201807001.

[本文引用: 1]

Regional development is a process in which industries develop, transform and upgrade constantly. Evolutionary economic geography understands the spatial evolution of firm, industry, cluster, network, city and region through the lens of firm entry, growth and exit, and argues that regional industrial evolution is path dependent and determined by inter-industrial technological relatedness. However, path dependence theory overemphasizes the endogenous factors in regional industrial development and ignores the critical role of external linkages and institutional factors, which would bring path creation for regional development. In China, there has been dramatic transformation in regional industrial structure since the economic reform. Empirical studies indicate that technological relatedness has indeed significantly determined regional industrial evolution, suggesting a path dependent process. Meanwhile, marketization, globalization and regional decentralization provide great opportunities to create new industries for regional development. In particular, external linkage, institutional factors and purposeful and strategic actions of local actors would stimulate path creation.

汪明峰, 郗厚雪.

城市新兴技术产业的演化路径比较分析: 以长三角物联网产业为例

地理研究, 2015, 34(9): 1697-1707.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj201509008      [本文引用: 1]

1990年代后期以来,经济地理学出现了演化思潮,一些新的概念为分析产业的空间演化提供了有效的理论工具。基于演化经济地理学中的路径依赖理论,以长三角地区的物联网产业为例,探讨了新兴产业兴起和演化过程的地方差异。重点选取无锡、上海、南京和杭州四个城市,采用多案例比较的方法,从产业发展的历史基础、集群状况、政府政策,以及主要动力机制等方面,分析了4个案例的异同点,并突出这些城市在区域经济和制度环境方面的差异。对产业演化机制的讨论还发现,技术基础、政策推动和偶然性事件是新兴技术产业初始发展阶段的主要动因。

[ Wang Mingfeng, Xi Houxue.

The evolutionary paths of new emerging industry in cities: A case study of the internet of things industry in the Yangtze River Delta region

Geographical Research, 2015, 34(9): 1697-1707.] DOI: 10.11821/d1yj201509008.

[本文引用: 1]

The geography of innovation and the regional development have attracted considerable scholarly attention, especially the spatial evolution processes of new technologies, enterprises, and industries. The development of a particular industry varies across locations, and more work is needed to study an emerging industry from a geographical perspective. The evolutionary economic geography provides effective theoretical tools for the analysis of the spatial evolution of industries and contributes to a better cognition of the mechanism for the evolution of economic landscapes. A significant agglomeration has been found in the Internet of things (IoT) industry in the following locations: Yangtze River Delta region, Pearl River Delta region, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (Bohai Rim) region, and some developed cities in the central and western regions of China. As the origin of the IoT industry, the Yangtze River Delta region has a full-fledged industry chain. Based on the path dependence theory, this paper explores the local differences of the emergence and evolution of the IoT industry in four cities of the Yangtze River Delta region: Wuxi, Shanghai, Nanjing, and Hangzhou. In Wuxi, occasional opportunity and local government are the significant determinants, while the development of IoT industry in Shanghai is driven by the industrial base and innovative institutional environment. For Nanjing and Hangzhou, the interactions between the fundamental conditions of industry and the state policies are the major impetuses. In conclusion, technological base, government policy, and occasional opportunity are the main drivers in the initial stage of emerging industry in China.

胡晓辉, 张文忠.

制度演化与区域经济弹性: 两个资源枯竭型城市的比较

地理研究, 2018, 37(7): 1308-1319.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj201807005      [本文引用: 1]

区域经济弹性是后危机时代经济地理学一个热门研究议题。已有研究侧重于将区域经济弹性概念化成区域经济体在受到冲击或干扰后所表现出来的一种应对能力和手段,但缺乏动态演化观。基于制度演化视角,将区域经济弹性概念化成一种制度演化过程,并根据制度演化的不同模式(如层叠、转化和替代等),提出了一种分析和理解区域经济弹性差异的方法。该方法将被应用到中国两个典型资源枯竭型城市(山东枣庄和辽宁阜新)的经济弹性比较分析中。通过关注2000年后两地新产业的诞生过程和机理,结果显示:枣庄的经济弹性同制度良性层叠和转化这两种模式密切相关,这两种模式有利于促进区域产业更新和多样化;然而,阜新的经济弹性则表现出一种对原有制度的不断厚化过程,使得在产业上体现了较强的路径持续和拓展性。制度演化视角能结合区域经济弹性的过程、能力和结果这三个方面,有助于提升区域经济弹性的理论和实证研究。

[ Hu Xiaohui, Zhang Wenzhong.

Institutional evolution and regional economic resilience: A comparison of two resource-exhausted cities in China

Geographical Research, 2018, 37(7): 1308-1319.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201807005.

[本文引用: 1]

The existing literature on economic resilience of cities and regions shows that attention has been mainly paid to its characterization as capabilities and outcomes, while little research has been conducted on it as processes. This paper aims to address this knowledge gap. Drawing upon institutional change theories, this paper proposes an approach, and tries to explain how different modes of the institutional change affect industrial evolution and thus generate divergent resilience of cities. The approach is applied to the two case studies of Chinese mining cities, namely Zaozhuang in Shandong province and Fuxin in Liaoning province, which are both faced with resource depletion since 2000. By focusing on the ways in which new industries emerge, the empirical investigation illustrates that Zaozhuang's resilience involves positive layering and conversion that have enabled industrial renewal and diversification, whereas Fuxin's resilience unfolds with institutional thickening, characterized by industrial adjustment with strong effects of path persistence and extension. This study suggests that the institutional change approach can better update the understanding of regional resilience by incorporating processes, capabilities and outcomes.

苏灿, 曾刚.

演化经济地理学视角下区域新路径发展的研究评述与展望

经济地理, 2021, 41(2): 23-34.

[本文引用: 1]

[ Su Can, Zeng Gang.

Review on study of regional new path development from the perspective of evolutionary economic geography

Economic Geography, 2021, 41(2): 23-34.] DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.02.003.

[本文引用: 1]

吴頔, 丁婧, 袁丰.

政府能动性对外部冲击型战略耦合断裂的暂时性调节研究: 以江苏省昆山市为例

地理研究, 2021, 40(12): 3470-3482.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj020210168      [本文引用: 1]

突如其来的新冠肺炎疫情在全球蔓延肆虐,国家间和区域间的人员、货物流动阻滞,对全球生产网络带来了巨大冲击。受此影响,涉外企业纷纷出现了与国际市场、供应链、劳动力、金融资本之间的短暂割裂。在此外部冲击面前,基于全球经济深度链接的战略耦合理论,无法有效解释全球生产网络出现的被动性、暂时性、突发性的耦合断裂。以江苏省昆山市为例,通过深入访谈和调研,重点研究地方政府能动性在维系战略耦合联系中的作用机制。研究发现,昆山政府以本地产业链供应链信息的系统掌握为基础,综合运用协调整合、政策支撑、资源调配等能力,修复导致耦合断裂的环节或重建新耦合。本文提出外部冲击型耦合断裂这一概念,丰富拓展了对战略耦合动态性的认识。其次,本文深化了对政府-全球生产网络互动联结的理解,讨论了地方政府在维系战略耦合联系中的能动性作用和局限性。

[ Wu Di, Ding Jing, Yuan Feng.

The role of government departments in mediating shock-driven coupling ruptures: A case study of Kunshan, China

Geographical Research, 2021, 40(12): 3470-3482.] DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020210168.

[本文引用: 1]

Since 2020, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused huge impacts on people's health and daily life, as well as economic development and employment worldwide. People were quarantined, transportation was blocked, and borders were closed. As a result of the pandemic, global production networks (GPNs), which organize production in a highly decentralized form and in a global scale, have been negatively affected to the greatest extent. This phenomenon demonstrates the temporary, shock-driven discontinuities and ruptures of strategic couplings in GPNs, which tend to be relatively overlooked in the existing GPN literature. In China, when the COVID-19 pandemic broke out earliest, a large number of firms and factories were shut down and its economy once came to a standstill. However, China's economy soon recovered. This article argues that the rapid recovery has largely been driven by the strong, active and effective interventions of Chinese government actors at various levels, including the Chinese central as well as local and regional governments. This article uses the case of Kunshan in Jiangsu province as a case study to illustrate how the local government in particular played key roles in enabling and facilitating the restoration of coupling ruptures. Kunshan is highly plugged into GPNs, with a high level of foreign direct investments and exports. As such, it was heavily affected by the global pandemic initially. Specifically, this article illustrates four inter-connected problems that globally-plugged firms tended to face under the economic shock caused by the pandemic, that is, in terms of their access to the market, suppliers, labour, and finance. This article then shows how the local government of Kunshan utilized and mobilized the unique power and resources, namely, local industrial information, coordinating capacity, policy tools, and resource allocation capacity, to help firms overcome such challenges and in turn enabled and facilitated Kunshan's recovery from coupling ruptures. However, this article demonstrates the limitations of the local government alone in mediating crisis-driven coupling ruptures.

余振, 黄平, 龚惠文.

绿色机会窗口与后发城市可持续性转型

中国人口·资源与环境, 2022, 32(6): 94-103.

[本文引用: 1]

[ Yu Zhen, Huang Ping, Gong Huiwen.

Green windows of opportunities and sustainability transitions in latercomer cities

China Population, Resource and Environment, 2022, 32(6): 94-103.] DOI:10. 12062/cpre. 20220115.

[本文引用: 1]

Huang P, Yu Z.

Aligning industry interests with urban priorities to foster energy transitions: Insights from two Chinese cities

Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2021, 14(2): 341-359. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsab003.

URL     [本文引用: 2]

This article uses the Dimensions of Urban Energy Transitions (DUET) framework to analyse energy transitions in two Chinese cities at different development stages and provide insights into the mechanisms underlying decarbonised industrialisation. The results show that a ‘green’ coalition between industrial actors and local governments is critical to the initiation and scale-up of low-carbon innovations that provide strong endogenous incentives for proactive transitions. The study unveils the relevance of technology-specific characteristics and the potential countering effect of urban politics in shaping the outcomes of energy transitions, adding both nuance and depth to the DUET framework.

沈静, 王少谷, 周楚平.

环境公正视角下广州污染企业分布与区域人口社会特征的时空关系研究

地理研究, 2022, 41(1): 46-62.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj020210547      [本文引用: 1]

环境公正研究关注人民生活质量的空间公正问题。从环境经济地理学的角度,本研究以广州市为研究对象,采用1995年、2004年、2013 年的工业企业数据和1990年、2000 年、2010 年的人口普查数据,运用空间可视化工具和多尺度地理加权回归模型等方法,分析了广州市污染企业的分布及其与区域人口社会特征关系的时空变化,然后探讨转型背景下中国城市污染企业分布的环境公正问题。研究发现,广州市污染企业空间分布经历由中心城区集聚向近郊区和边界地带集聚的过程,在城市产业空间重构与社会空间分异的共同作用下,污染企业空间分布的环境不公正问题由最初表现不明显转变为全市范围的阶层差异与企业污染负担之间关系,具有不同于西方环境不公正现象的特征和成因。

[ Shen Jing, Wang Shaogu, Zhou Chuping.

Spatio-temporal relations between distribution of polluting enterprises and regional sociodemographic characteristics in Guangzhou from the perspective of environment justice

Geographical Research, 2022, 41(1):46-62.] DOI:10.11821/dlyj020210547.

[本文引用: 1]

Environmental justice studies focus on the spatial justice of people's life quality. With the rapid development of urbanization and industrialization, industrial pollution has led to intensifying environmental degradation. Due to the spatial distribution of polluting enterprises, the levels of environmental degradation vary among urban settlements in the city. Recently, this variance has become a major environmental justice concern in China. Based on this understanding, it is imperative to understand the relationship between distribution of polluting enterprises and the social characteristics of the regional population from the spatial and temporal perspective. Cities with many industrial enterprises can lead to differential distributions in residential settlements. Guangzhou, a typical city, is selected as the empirical case. Based on a collection of enterprise census of 1995, 2004 and 2013 and the population census data of 1990, 2000 and 2010, this study analyzed the distribution of polluting enterprises and its spatial changes using ArcGIS visualization tool, and further examined the spatio-temporal changes of relationship between polluting enterprises and sociodemographic characteristics of regional population in Guangzhou by geographic weighted regression model. We find that the clustering of polluting enterprises has transferred from the central city to the suburban and border areas. The regression results reveal that old people and immigrants had become the main groups greatly affected by enterprise pollution in the 1990s, whereas differences among social classes including social stability, educational level and income level are related to the spatial distribution of polluting enterprises since 2000. This change of spatial relationship reflects the reconfiguration of urban industries and socio-spatial differentiation in modern Guangzhou. Further analysis discovers that the spatially influenced environmental injustice of pollution evolves from insignificance to a significantly city-wide relationship between different social classes and the pollution burden of enterprises. This evolution is different from the characteristics and mechanisms in a Western context. Compared to their Western counterparts, the public environmental resources are endowed with commodity attributes and the fundamental driving force to redistribute spatial environmental benefits through profit capture under the Chinese social market system. Based on our findings, this research further calls attention to seriously considering the environmental rights of low-income classes and emphasizing the need of public participation when making relevant policies.

毛熙彦, 贺灿飞.

环境经济地理学的研究现状与挑战

地理研究, 2022, 41(1): 4-17.

DOI:10.11821/dlyj020210667      [本文引用: 1]

环境经济地理学是经济地理学反思资源环境在学科内部边缘化的产物,旨在重建经济地理学理论与资源环境之间的联系。历经近20年的发展,环境经济地理学研究片段化、地位边缘化的问题无明显改观。为此,本文回溯了环境经济地理学的发展思路,归纳了以环境经济地理学名义开展的研究工作,探讨了环境经济地理学发展面临的挑战与应对。研究发现:① 环境经济地理学过去20年的发展思路是以经济地理学理论为基础,探讨适应资源环境变化的经济发展与空间布局模式,凝练了环境治理和绿色转型两个研究主题。② 面向环境治理,环境经济地理学应用全球价值链和全球生产网络理论,探讨企业和地方如何实现环境和经济效益的共同提升;同时,借助区位分析评估作为区位因子的环境规制如何影响经济布局,发现了诸多“经典假说”的反例。③ 面向绿色转型,环境经济地理学与演化经济地理学结合,应用区域多样化和路径创造理论,分析了区域绿色转型的条件和过程。④ 环境经济地理学的未来发展需要克服范式差异、加强问题导向、推动理论创新,挖掘中国丰富的环境经济地理问题所蕴含的机遇。

[ Mao Xiyan, He Canfei.

Environmental economic geography: Recent advances and future challenges

Geographical Research, 2022, 41(1):4-17.] DOI:10.11821/dlyj020210667.

[本文引用: 1]

Environmental economic geography emerges as a reflection of the marginalization of the environment within the discipline of economic geography. It seeks to re-establish the linkage between economic geography and the environment. After almost two decades of development, environmental economic geography is still suffering from its poly-vocal, fragmented, and marginalized issues. This study scrutinizes the debates over the research agenda on environmental economic geography and reviews two primary strands of the literature. On this basis, this study discusses challenges for the future development of environmental economic geography. This study comes to four conclusions. Firstly, the development of environmental economic geography follows the theoretical advances in economic geography. It explore how environmental changes modify the spatial patterns of economic development. It also investigate how the spatial configuration of economic activities responds to the rising environmental risks and intensifying resource scarcity. Two research themes emerge, namely environmental governance and green transition. Secondly, environmental economic geography uses the theoretical framework of the Global Value Chain (GVC) and Global Production Network (GPN) to investigate how firms and regions can simultaneously upgrade in environmental and economic terms. It also seeks to establish the linkages between GVC/GPN governance and environmental governance. On the other hand, environmental economic geography identifies environmental regulation as a locational factor and examines its role in the location choice model. The empirical result offers various counter-examples for classical hypotheses, such as the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, the Porter Hypothesis, and the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Thirdly, environmental economic geography combines its theoretical interests with the theoretical advances in evolutionary economic geography. Particularly, the regional diversification theory and the path creation theory are incorporated into the empirical studies of environmental economic geography, which seek to unravel the conditions and processes of green transitions. Based on these theories, recent studies also offer some predictors for the regional green transition. Lastly, this study proposes that environmental economic geography is still suffering from the divergence between natural science and social science on research paradigm. Besides, the theoretical development of environmental economic geography is subject to a late-comer disadvantage. In this regard, it requires environmental economic geography to become more problem-oriented in the future, embracing the opportunities embedded in the issues for China’s sustainable development.

/