产业发展与经济地理

“一带一路”沿线国家专利合作网络演化与影响因素

  • 王武林 , 1 ,
  • 陈倩 1 ,
  • 黄丽 , 2, 3 ,
  • 万汭 1
展开
  • 1.湖南师范大学旅游学院, 长沙 410081
  • 2.华东师范大学地理科学学院, 上海 200062
  • 3.华东师范大学全球创新与发展研究院, 上海 200062
黄丽(1969-),女,四川南充人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为世界政治经济地理、区域发展等。E-mail:

王武林(1982-),男,湖南邵阳人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为区域可持续发展等。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2024-12-10

  录用日期: 2025-10-28

  网络出版日期: 2026-02-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42371224)

湖南省自然科学基金项目(2023JJ30406)

The evolution and influencing factors of patent cooperation networks along the Belt and Road

  • WANG Wulin , 1 ,
  • CHEN Qian 1 ,
  • HUANG Li , 2, 3 ,
  • WAN Rui 1
Expand
  • 1. College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
  • 2. School of Geographical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
  • 3. Institute of Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

Received date: 2024-12-10

  Accepted date: 2025-10-28

  Online published: 2026-02-04

摘要

深化国际专利合作是推进“一带一路”沿线国家技术交流传播的有效途径,亦是加快技术创新、产业升级和区域协同发展的重要方式。基于PATENTSCOPE数据库,利用Mann-Kendall趋势分析检验法、社会网络分析法和地理探测器模型,本文着力探讨1990—2021年“一带一路”沿线国家专利合作网络演化与影响因素。结果表明:① “一带一路”沿线国家专利合作大致历经缓慢增长(1990—1995年)、快速增长(1996—2012年)、转型提质(2013—2021年)3个阶段;专利合作网络整体密度较低,形成了以中国为核心,新加坡、韩国、意大利、俄罗斯等为次核心的网络结构形态。② 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家多限于同类型技术合作,跨领域的交叉合作尚待强化,IPC技术合作主要集中在H04W、H04L、H04B和A61K等领域;合作频次和强度大致呈“东南亚>东欧>东亚>西欧>西亚和北非>南亚>撒哈拉以南非洲>南美洲>中美洲>大洋洲>中亚”的空间差序格局,洲际国家间专利合作空间非均衡性特征显著;中国本土企业和“一带一路”沿线国家的跨国企业主体数量均有所增长,科研院所和其他类型占比有所缩减。③ 选择32个样本国家研究中国与“一带一路”沿线国家专利合作网络演化的影响因素具有代表性,经敏感性分析说明相关研究结论具有较好稳定性,研发支出占GDP比重、R&D研究人员数量、居民专利申请量、信息和通信技术服务出口、知识产权使用费等因素对提高中国与“一带一路”沿线国家的专利合作水平存在显著正向影响,知识产权使用费、人口规模、研发支出占GDP比重、教育公共开支占GDP比重、人均GDP以及“一带一路”沿线国家首都与中国首都的距离等因素交互具有较强的正向影响。

本文引用格式

王武林 , 陈倩 , 黄丽 , 万汭 . “一带一路”沿线国家专利合作网络演化与影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2026 , 45(1) : 165 -187 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020241402

Abstract

Deepening international patent cooperation as an effective way means to promote technological exchange in countries along the Belt and Road and an important approach to accelerate technological innovation, industrial upgrading, and regional collaborative development. Based on the PATENTSCOPE database, this study employs the Mann-Kendall trend test method, social network analysis, and Geodetector model to explore the evolution and influencing factors of patent cooperation networks in countries along the Belt and Road from 1990 to 2021. The results indicate that: (1) Patent cooperation among these countries evolved in three stages: slow growth (1990-1995), rapid growth (1996-2012), and transformation toward quality (2013-2021). The overall density of the patent collaboration network is low, with China as the core and Singapore, South Korea, Italy and Russia as secondary hubs. (2) Collaboration between China and countries along the Belt and Road remains largely confined to similar technological fields, with cross-disciplinary cooperation still underdeveloped. IPC-based cooperation concentrates mainly in H04W, H04L, H04B, communication technology services, and intellectual property royalties show significant positive effects on enhancing patent. Moreover, intellectual property royalties, population size, R&D expenditure as a percentage of GDP, public education expenditure as a percentage of GDP, GDP per capita, and the distance between capitals exhibits strong positive synergistic effect. The frequency and intensity of cooperation display a spatial hierarchy: Southeast Asia > Eastern Europe> East Asia > Western Europe> West Asia and North Africa > South Asia > Sub-Saharan Africa > South America > Central America > Oceania > Central Asia, revealing significant intercontinental disparities. Both Chinese domestic enterprises and multinational corporations within countries along the Belt and Road have increased in number, while the proportions of research institutions and other entities have declined. (3) Studying 32 representative sample countries captures the factors influencing the evolution of patent cooperation networks between China and countries along the Belt and Road. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of the conclusions. Factors such as R&D expenditure as a percentage of GDP, the number of R&D researchers, resident patent applications, exports of information and communication technology services, and intellectual property royalties show significant positive effects on enhancing patent. Moreover, intellectual property royalties, population size, R&D expenditure as a percentage of GDP, public education expenditure as a percentage of GDP, GDP per capita, and the distance between capitals exhibits strong positive synergistic effect.

衷心感谢匿名评审专家认真负责的审阅指导,评审专家在文献分析、样本数据的敏感性与代表性、模型检验优化以及政策讨论等方面的详细修改建议,使本文受益匪浅。

[1]
徐清. “一带一路”国际科技合作: 机制设计与模式创新. 现代经济探讨, 2023(10): 80-87.

[Xu Qing. “The Belt and Road” internationalscientific and technologicalcooperation: Mechanism design and modelinnovation. Modern Economic Research, 2023(10): 80-87.]

[2]
温军, 张森, 王思钦. “双循环”新发展格局下我国国际科技合作: 新形势与提升策略. 国际贸易, 2021(6): 14-21.

[Wen Jun, Zhang Sen, Wang Siqin. China's international scientific and technological cooperation under the new development pattern of “dual circulation”: New situations and promotion strategies. Intertrade, 2021(6): 14-21.]

[3]
Xiao W W, Xue Q H, Yi X. Does the Belt and Road initiative promote international innovation cooperation? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2023, 10(1): 1-12.

DOI

[4]
张誉夫, 谢建国. “一带一路”建设与沿线国家经济的包容性增长: 基于社会流动性指数的研究. 经济问题探索, 2024(7): 44-64.

[Zhang Yufu, Xie Jianguo. Construction of the Belt and Road and inclusive economic growth in countries along the route: A study based on the social mobility index. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2024(7): 44-64.]

[5]
Gao S. Sports trans-cultural communication between China and Russia under the Belt and Road Initiative. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 2020, 37(17): 1827-1843.

DOI

[6]
Feng T T, Gong X L, Guo Y H, et al. Electricity cooperation strategy between China and ASEAN countries under “The Belt and Road”. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2020, 30: 100512.

DOI

[7]
何宏艳, 吴树仙, 辛加余, 等. “一带一路”科技创新合作现状、挑战与发展方向. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(9): 1315-1324.

[He Hongyan, Wu Shuxian, Xin Jiayu, et al. Belt and Road science & technology cooperation: Current situation, challenges and development directions. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(9): 1315-1324.]

[8]
滕子优, 朱雪忠, 胡成. 中美与RCEP成员技术合作网络演化及稳定性研究. 中国科技论坛, 2022(12): 169-178.

[Teng Ziyou, Zhu Xuezhong, Hu Cheng. The evolution and resilience of technological collaboration network of China and the U.S. with RCEP parties. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2022(12): 169-178.]

[9]
段欣, 张洁逸, 丁晟春. 产业领域专利合作状态与演化分析: 以人工智能领域为例. 情报科学, 2020, 38(12): 27-35.

[Duan Xin, Zhang Jieyi, Ding Shengchun. Analysis on the state and evolution of patent cooperation in the industrial field: Taking the field of artificial intelligence as an example. Information Science, 2020, 38(12): 27-35.]

[10]
沈泽洲, 王承云. 上海参与全球科技创新网络地位研究: 基于WIPO专利合作数据. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(2): 93-103.

[Shen Zezhou, Wang Chengyun. Shanghai's position in global science and technology innovation network: Based on WIPO patent cooperation data. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(2): 93-103.]

DOI

[11]
Ying Y. Research on the influence of multi-dimensional distance on patent cooperation between China and countries along the “One Belt and One Road”. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Science, 2022, 6(2): 66-71.

[12]
Sun M B, Zhang X Q, Zhang X X, et al. The impact of a multilevel innovation network and government support on innovation performance: An empirical study of the Chengdu-Chongqing City cluster. Sustainability, 2022, 14(12): 7334

DOI

[13]
袁燕, 吴妍, 杨大鹏. 小世界、结构洞与城市创新的网络机制: 来自长三角城市群的证据. 管理工程学报, 2025, 39(2): 14-26.

[Yuan Yan, Wu Yan, Yang Dapeng. Network mechanisms of small worlds, structural holes and urban innovation: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2025, 39(2): 14-26.]

[14]
张俊, 姜海宁. 合成型产业全球创新网络演化与邻近性机理: 以节能环保产业为例. 地理研究, 2024, 43(2): 357-376.

DOI

[Zhang Jun, Jiang Haining. Evolution of global innovation network and its proximity mechanism in synthetic industry: A case study of energy conservation and environmental protection industry. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(2): 357-376.]

[15]
杨蕙馨, 孙芹, 王海花. 知识网络动态性对高校协同创新绩效的影响研究: 合作网络的调节作用. 经济与管理研究, 2022, 43(10): 68-80.

[Yang Huixin, Sun Qin, Wang Haihua. Research on impact of knowledge network dynamics on collaborative innovation performance in universities: Moderating role of cooperation networks. Research on Economics and Management, 2022, 43(10): 68-80.]

[16]
Tian J L. The role of entrepreneurship, cooperative innovation, environmental investment in relationship between the Belt and Road Initiative and green innovation upgrading. Management Decision, 2024, 62(8): 2510-2531.

DOI

[17]
关峻, 任嘉琪, 邢李志, 等. 中关村高新技术企业合作申请专利网络集聚效应分析. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(21): 56-64.

[Guan Jun, Ren Jiaqi, Xing Lizhi, et al. Analysis of the agglomeration effect in high-tech enterprise patent cooperation network of Zhongguancun Science Park. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2022, 39(21): 56-64.]

[18]
孟婧, 邱长波, 左进尧. 中国国内机构间专利合作网络的演化研究: 基于中国知网1999—2018年专利数据. 情报理论与实践, 2021, 44(12): 48-54.

[Meng Jing, Qiu Changbo, Zuo Jinyao. Research on the evolution of patent collaboration network of domestic institutions in China: Based on the patent data of CNKI from 1999 to 2018. Information Studies (Theory & Application), 2021, 44(12): 48-54.]

[19]
李欣, 温阳, 黄鲁成, 等. 多层网络分析视域下的新兴技术研发合作网络演化特征研究. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(1): 62-70.

[Li Xin, Wen Yang, Huang Lucheng, et al. Research on evolution characteristics of emerging technology R & D cooperation network from the perspective of multi-level network analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 2021, 40(1): 62-70.]

[20]
孙澍, 陈刚, 王光辉. 中国城市知识合作网络结构及其多维邻近性机制: 基于论文合作规模和质量的对比分析. 地理研究, 2024, 43(6): 1443-1461.

DOI

[Sun Shu, Chen Gang, Wang Guanghui. The structure of knowledge cooperation network in China's cities and its multidimensional proximity mechanism: Comparative analysis based on the scale and quality of paper collaboration. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(6): 1443-1461.]

[21]
赵彩云, 吕拉昌. 中关村科技园国际创新合作网络演化特征: 基于PCT专利分析. 世界地理研究, 2024, 33(8): 148-160.

[Zhao Caiyun, Lyu Lachang. Evolution characteristics of international innovation cooperation network in Zhongguancun: Based on PCT patent analysis. World Regional Studies, 2024, 33(8): 148-160.]

DOI

[22]
范斐, 连欢, 王雪利, 等. 区域协同创新对创新绩效的影响机制研究. 地理科学, 2020, 40(2): 165-172.

DOI

[Fan Fei, Lian Huan, Wang Xueli, et al. Threshold effect of regional collaborative innovation on innovation performance. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 165-172.]

DOI

[23]
戴靓, 纪宇凡, 王嵩, 等. 中国城市知识创新网络的演化特征及其邻近性机制. 资源科学, 2022, 44(7): 1494-1505.

DOI

[Dai Liang, Ji Yufan, Wang Song, et al. Evolutionary characteristics and proximity mechanism of intercity knowledge innovation networks in China. Resources Science, 2022, 44(7): 1494-1505.]

DOI

[24]
曹兴, 赵倩可, 许羿. 新兴技术合作创新网络形成影响因素研究: 基于虚拟现实技术的专利数据. 科学决策, 2024(2): 62-78.

[Cao Xing, Zhao Qianke, Xu Yi. Research on influencing factors of emerging technology cooperation innovation network formation: Patent data based on virtual reality technology. Scientific Decision Making, 2024(2): 62-78.]

[25]
周锐波, 邱奕锋, 胡耀宗. 中国城市创新网络演化特征及多维邻近性机制. 经济地理, 2021, 41(5): 1-10.

DOI

[Zhou Ruibo, Qiu Yifeng, Hu Yaozong. Characteristics, evolution and mechanism of inter-city innovation network in China: From a perspective of multi-dimensional proximity. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(5): 1-10.]

DOI

[26]
席强敏, 李国平, 孙瑜康, 等. 京津冀科技合作网络的演变特征及影响因素. 地理学报, 2022, 77(6): 1359-1373.

DOI

[Xi Qiangmin, Li Guoping, Sun Yukang, et al. Evolutionary characteristics of science and technology cooperation network of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and its influencing factors. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(6): 1359-1373.]

DOI

[27]
关鹏, 王曰芬, 傅柱, 等. 基于专利合作网络的研发团队识别及创新产出影响研究. 数据分析与知识发现, 2022, 6(5): 99-111.

[Guan Peng, Wang Yuefen, Fu Zhu, et al. Identifying R&D teams and innovations with patent collaboration networks. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2022, 6(5): 99-111.]

DOI

[28]
Wang H. Research on national scientific research cooperation between China and the “one belt and one road”: Based on the frontier gravity model. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2019, 9(5): 1234.

DOI

[29]
叶阳平, 马文聪, 张光宇. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家科技合作现状研究: 基于专利和论文的比较分析. 图书情报知识, 2016, 33(4): 60-68.

[Ye Yangping, Ma Wencong, Zhang Guangyu. Research on the current situation of science and technology cooperation between China and countries along the Belt and Road: Comparative analysis based on patent and paper data. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 2016, 33(4): 60-68.]

[30]
王继民, 王若佳, 曾兰馨, 等. 1996—2015年“一带一路”沿线国家科研合作网络的演化分析. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(16): 76-83.

DOI

[Wang Jimin, Wang Ruojia, Zeng Lanxin, et al. Analysis of dynamical evolution of scientific collaboration networks among countries along the “the Belt and Road Initiative” from 1996 to 2015. Library and Information Service, 2017, 61(16): 76-83.]

DOI

[31]
丁洁兰, 杨立英, 孙海荣, 等. 基于文献计量的“一带一路”区域及沿线国家科研合作态势研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(6): 626-636.

[Ding Jielan, Yang Liying, Sun Hairong, et al. Bibliometric study on research collaboration among the Belt and Road areas and countries. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(6): 626-636.]

[32]
胡顺顺, 姚威. “一带一路”高校联盟合作影响因素研究: 基于中国与沿线68个国家双边数据的分析. 复旦教育论坛, 2023, 21(2): 88-95.

[Hu Shunshun, Yao Wei. The influencing factors of the “Belt and Road” university alliances' cooperation: Based on bilateral data between China and 68 countries along the Belt and Road. Fudan Education Forum, 2023, 21(2): 88-95.]

[33]
Sun J, Li Z G, Li C, et al. Progress of establishing the China-Indonesia joint laboratory on HTGR. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2022, 397: 111959.

[34]
周青, 刘瑶, 王东鹏, 等. 面向“一带一路”企业技术标准合作网络演化模式: 基于国别的时序变化的社会网络聚类分析. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(9): 54-70.

[Zhou Qing, Liu Yao, Wang Dongpeng, et al. The evolution modes of the enterprises' technology standard cooperation networks for the Belt and Road initiatives: A cluster analysis based on longitudinal social networks in different Belt and Road countries. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2022, 43(9): 54-70.]

[35]
Che X H, Kuang W J, Zhang H J, et al. Does the Belt and Road initiative alleviate energy poverty in participating countries? Energy Reports, 2023, 9: 2395-2404.

DOI

[36]
巫俊, 魏浩. “一带一路”沿线国家农业专利合作网络演进特征及影响因素研究. 科学管理研究, 2024, 42(6): 157-170.

[Wu Jun, Wei Hao. Research on the network evolution characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural patent cooperation of countries along “the Belt and Road”. Scientific Management Research, 2024, 42(6): 157-170.]

[37]
谢刚, 邰季雯, 李文鹣. “一带一路”背景下数字通信领域跨国专利合作特征及网络演化研究. 技术经济, 2022, 41(2): 15-25.

[Xie Gang, Tai Jiwen, Li Wenjian. Research on the characteristics of transnational patent cooperation and network evolution in the field of digital communication under the background of “Belt and Road”. Journal of Technology Economics, 2022, 41(2): 15-25.]

[38]
高珺, 余翔. 中国与“一带一路”国家专利合作特征与技术态势研究. 中国科技论坛, 2021(7): 169-178.

[Gao Jun, Yu Xiang. Characteristics of patent cooperation and technology trend between China and “the Belt and Road Initiatives”countries. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2021(7): 169-178.]

[39]
焦美琪, 杜德斌, 桂钦昌, 等. “一带一路”视角下城市技术合作网络演化特征与影响因素研究. 地理研究, 2021, 40(4): 913-927.

DOI

[Jiao Meiqi, Du Debin, Gui Qinchang, et al. The spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban technical corporation networks: From the perspective of Belt and Road. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(4): 913-927.]

[40]
Lyu K J, Cai D X, Hao M. Dynamic innovation collaboration based on complex network analysis: Evidence from the “Belt and Road” initiative. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2024, 15(4): 19157-19182.

DOI

[41]
陈欣. “一带一路”沿线国家科技合作网络演化研究. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(10): 1811-1817, 1857.

[Chen Xin. Study on scientific and technological collaboration network evolution of countries in one belt one road area. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(10): 1811-1817, 1857.]

[42]
梁梦洁, 张明倩. 跨国专利合作存续期及影响因素研究: 基于中国与“一带一路” 沿线国家专利数据. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(24): 184-191.

[Liang Mengjie, Zhang Mingqian. A study of duration and influencing factors of transnational patent cooperation: Based on patent data of China and countries along the Belt and Road. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(24): 184-191.]

[43]
Gao J, Yu X. Factors affecting the evolution of technical cooperation among “Belt and Road Initiative” countries based on TERGMs and ERGMs. Sustainability, 2022, 14(3): 1760.

DOI

[44]
张明倩, 柯莉. “一带一路”跨国专利合作网络及影响因素研究. 软科学, 2018, 32(6): 21-25, 29.

[Zhang Mingqian, Ke Li. Study on the Belt and Road network of transnational patent cooperation and its influencing factors. Soft Science, 2018, 32(6): 21-25, 29.]

[45]
Wang J F, Li X H, Christakos G, et al. Geographical detectors‐based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun Region, China. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24(1): 107-127.

DOI

[46]
楼宇. 中国与拉美共建“一带一路”: 进展、挑战及前景展望. 世界社会主义研究, 2023, 8(5): 76-84, 119.

[Lou Yu. Joint construction of the “Belt and Road” by China and Latin American countries: Progress, challenges and prospects. World Socialism Studies, 2023, 8(5): 76-84, 119.]

[47]
沈喜彭. 中国与非洲共建“一带一路”的重大成就. 现代国际关系, 2025(1): 125-146, 149.

[Shen Xipeng. Major achievements of African countries participating in the Belt and Road cooperation. Contemporary International Relations, 2025(1): 125-146, 149.]

[48]
阳昕, 周怡, 张敏, 等. 中国与“一带一路”沿线国家跨国专利合作现状研究. 科技管理研究, 2020, 40(8): 191-199.

[Yang Xin, Zhou Yi, Zhang Min, et al. On the status quo of transnational patent cooperation between China and countries along “the Belt and Road”. Science and Technology Management Research, 2020, 40(8): 191-199.]

文章导航

/