EN中文

地理研究 >

2026 , Vol. 45 >Issue 1: 19 - 38

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj020250141

城市体检与更新

古都更新背景下文化环境对地方依恋的影响研究——以开封市155个社区为例

  • 杜锦 , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • 郭雨臣 1, 2 ,
  • 喻忠磊 1, 2 ,
  • 苗长虹 , 1, 2 ,
  • 程士源 2, 4
展开
  • 1.河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心/黄河文明省部共建协同创新中心， 开封 475001
  • 2.河南大学地理与工程学部， 开封 475004
  • 3.河南省城乡规划设计研究总院股份有限公司， 郑州 450044
  • 4.河南大学河南省时空大数据产业技术研究院， 郑州 450046
苗长虹（1965-），男，河南鄢陵人，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为经济地理与空间规划。E-mail:

杜锦（1986-），女，河南温县人，博士研究生，正高级工程师，国家注册城乡规划师，主要研究方向为城市更新与区域发展。E-mail:

收稿日期: 2025-02-10

  录用日期: 2025-07-09

  网络出版日期: 2026-02-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目(42171186)

国家自然科学基金项目(42371266)

河南兴文化工程文化研究专项项目(2022XWH058)

河南省自然资源厅“揭榜挂帅”科研项目(2024-02)

收起

The impact of cultural environment on place attachment in the context of ancient capital regeneration: A case study of 155 communities in Kaifeng

  • DU Jin , 1, 2, 3 ,
  • GUO Yuchen 1, 2 ,
  • YU Zhonglei 1, 2 ,
  • MIAO Changhong , 1, 2 ,
  • CHENG Shiyuan 2, 4
Expand
  • 1. Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development & Collaborative Innovation Center on Yellow River Civilization Jointly Built by Henan Province and Ministry of Education, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China
  • 2. Faculty of Geographical Science and Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
  • 3. Henan Urban and Rural Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450044, China
  • 4. Henan Industrial Technology Academy of Spatiotemporal Big Data, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China

Received date: 2025-02-10

  Accepted date: 2025-07-09

  Online published: 2026-02-04

Fold

摘要

古都城市保护与更新是实现历史文化传承和城市文化复兴的重要路径。基于多层结构与多尺度空间效应的双重视角，构建“个体-社区”文化环境对居民地方依恋影响的分析框架。以开封市155个社区为研究对象，利用城市体检满意度调查数据、街景（SVI）数据和兴趣点（POI）等多源数据，采用分层线性模型（Hierarchical Linear model, HLM）与空间多尺度统计模型（Hierarchical Spatial Autoregressive model, HSAR）探讨个体感知的文化环境及社区文化环境对地方依恋的影响机制。研究结果显示：① 个体层面，个体感知的文化环境显著促进地方依恋：城市文化遗产保护与利用满意度（X1）、公共文化设施满意度（X2）、传统风貌满意度（X3）以及传统文化活动满意度（X4）均显著提升地方依恋。② 社区文化环境显著增强了个体感知的文化环境对地方依恋的正向影响。③ 社区层面，社区文化环境（C3传统风貌指数）对地方依恋的影响呈现显著的空间双重作用：直接效应表现为本社区传统风貌显著促进本社区居民地方依恋；而间接效应表现为邻近社区的传统风貌对本社区居民地方依恋产生显著的抑制作用，揭示了负向空间溢出效应。本研究不仅揭示了古都城市保护与更新实践的积极作用，还为古都城市体检评估、更新策略优化及文化政策的制定提供了理论支持和实证依据。

关键词： 古都城市保护与更新; 城市体检; 文化环境; 地方依恋; 多尺度; 空间效应

本文引用格式

杜锦 , 郭雨臣 , 喻忠磊 , 苗长虹 , 程士源 . 古都更新背景下文化环境对地方依恋的影响研究——以开封市155个社区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2026 , 45(1) : 19 -38 . DOI: 10.11821/dlyj020250141

Abstract

The protection and regeneration of ancient capital cities constitute vital pathways for advancing cultural renaissance and sustaining cultural inheritance.Adopting a dual perspective that integrates multi-level structures and multi-scale spatial effects, this study develops an analytical framework to examine how the “individual-community” cultural environment shapes residents' place attachment. Taking 155 communities in Kaifeng as the study area, the study employs multi-source data, including urban health examination satisfaction survey data, street view data (SVI), and points of interest (POI), to examine how individual perceptions of the cultural environment and objective community cultural environments influence place attachment. The analysis utilizes Hierarchical Linear Models (HLM) and Hierarchical Spatial Autoregressive Models (HSAR). The results show that: (1) At the individual level, individual perceptions of cultural environment play a significant role in enhancing place attachment. Specifically, four factors significantly enhance place attachment: satisfaction with urban cultural heritage preservation and utilization (X1), public cultural facilities (X2), traditional cityscape (X3), and traditional cultural activities (X4). (2) The community cultural environment significantly strengthens the positive effect of individual perceptions of the cultural environment on place attachment. (3) At the community level, community cultural environment (C3 traditional cityscape index) exerts a significant dual spatial effect on place attachment. The direct effect shows that the community's traditional cityscape significantly enhances the place attachment of its residents. In contrast, the indirect effect reveals that the traditional cityscape of neighboring communities has a notable inhibitory effect on place attachment within the community, highlighting a negative spatial spillover effect. This study not only highlights the positive impact of ancient capital city protection and regeneration practices, but also offers theoretical and empirical support for urban health examination, the optimization of regeneration strategies, and cultural policy-making.

Key words： protection and regeneration of ancient capital cities; urban health examination; cultural environment; place attachment; multi-scale; spatial effects

真诚感谢二位匿名评审专家在论文评审中所付出的时间和精力，评审专家对本文概念界定的严谨性、指标构建的合理性、模型方法报告的规范性、图表展示的清晰性以及结果分析的准确性等方面提出了富有建设性的宝贵意见，使本文的修改和完善获益匪浅！在调研和数据获取过程中，本文还得到了河南大学王洋洋、贾鑫、李丽杰、高明纯、季康等硕士、博士研究生，中国城市规划设计研究院许宏宇正高级工程师、王璇高级工程师，以及河南省城乡规划设计研究总院韩冰正高级工程师、李晨阳高级工程师、李青高级工程师、王向楠工程师等专家的鼎力支持与帮助，在此一并致以衷心的感谢！

参考文献

原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序
[1]
周俭, 田银生, 徐里格, 等. 历史城区如何破境重圆. 城市规划, 2023, 47(11): 25-31.

[Zhou Jian, Tian Yinsheng, Xu Lige, et al. How to reunite the fragmented historic urban areas? City Planning Review, 2023, 47(11): 25-31.]

[2]
苗长虹. 文化遗产保护能够从自然保护中学到什么: 以黄河国家文化公园建设为例. 探索与争鸣, 2022(6): 21-23.

[Miao Changhong. What can cultural heritage protection learn from nature conservation: Taking the construction of Yellow River national cultural park as an example. Exploration and Free Views, 2022(6): 21-23.]

[3]
张杨, 何依. 由分立走向集成: 历史城区体检评估制度的建构理路: 基于系统耦合理论. 城市规划学刊, 2024(3): 82-90.

[Zhang Yang, He Yi. From separation to integration: Constructing the system of examination assessment for historic urban areas based on system coupling theory. Urban Planning Forum, 2024(3): 82-90.]

[4]
杨保军, 郑德高, 陈鹏, 等. 城市规划的使命担当. 城市规划, 2023, 47(11): 4-9.

[Yang Baojun, Zheng Degao, Chen Peng, et al. Mission and responsibility of urban planning. City Planning Review, 2023, 47(11): 4-9.]

[5]
张兵. 探索历史文化名城保护的中国道路: 兼论“真实性”原则. 城市规划, 2011, 35(S1): 48-53.

[Zhang Bing. Re-thinking the concept of authenticity: Exploring China's way to historic and cultural city conservation. City Planning Review, 2011, 35(S1): 48-53.]

[6]
王世福, 易智康, 张晓阳. 中国城市更新转型的反思与展望. 城市规划学刊, 2023(1): 20-25.

[Wang Shifu, Yi Zhikang, Zhang Xiaoyang. Reflections and prospects on the transformation of China's urban regeneration. Urban Planning Forum, 2023(1): 20-25.]

[7]
张杨, 何依. 历史文化名城的研究进程、特点及趋势: 基于CiteSpace的数据可视化分析. 城市规划, 2020, 44(6): 73-82.

[Zhang Yang, He Yi. Research process, characteristics, and trends of historical and cultural cities: Based on the data visualization of CiteSpace. City Planning Review, 2020, 44(6): 73-82.]

[8]
何淼, 宋伟轩, 汪毅. 文化赋能城市更新的理论逻辑与现实路径: 以南京老城南为例. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(1): 147-163.

DOI

[He Miao, Song Weixuan, Wang Yi. Theoretical logic and practical path of cultural-empowered urban renewal: Taking the old southern city of Nanjing as an example. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(1): 147-163.]

DOI

[9]
张文忠, 何炬, 谌丽. 面向高质量发展的中国城市体检方法体系探讨. 地理科学, 2021, 41(1): 1-12.

DOI

[Zhang Wenzhong, He Ju, Chen Li. Method system of urban physical examination for high quality development in China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(1): 1-12.]

DOI

[10]
张文忠. 基于多尺度城市体检的城市更新路径研究. 地理研究, 2025, 44(5): 1175-1188.

DOI

[Zhang Wenzhong. Research on urban renewal pathways based on multi-scale urban health examination. Geographical Research, 2025, 44(5): 1175-1188.]

[11]
谌丽, 蒋雅卓. 社会满意度调查在城市体检与评估中的应用. 地理科学, 2021, 41(10): 1729-1741.

DOI

[Chen Li, Jiang Yazhuo. Application of social satisfaction survey in city health examination evaluation. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021, 41(10): 1729-1741.]

DOI

[12]
何炬, 张文忠, 曹靖, 等. 多源数据在城市体检中的有机融合与应用: 以北京市为例. 地理科学, 2022, 42(2): 185-197.

DOI

[He Ju, Zhang Wenzhong, Cao Jing, et al. Organic integration and application of multi-source data in city health examination: A case of Beijing. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022, 42(2): 185-197.]

DOI

[13]
王凯, 徐辉, 骆芊伊, 等. 基于城市空间复杂性关系的城市体检方法研究. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(1): 91-103.

DOI

[Wang Kai, Xu Hui, Luo Qianyi, et al. Research on urban health check methods based on the complexity of urban spatial relationships. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(1): 91-103.]

DOI

[14]
湛东升, 汪子晨, 周侃, 等. 公众环境质量感知对长三角城市居民幸福感的影响效应及尺度差异. 地理研究, 2025, 44(5): 1207-1225.

DOI

[Zhan Dongsheng, Wang Zichen, Zhou Kan, et al. The effects of public perception of environmental quality on the residents' subjective well-being and their scale differences in the Yangtze River Delta. Geographical Research, 2025, 44(5): 1207-1225.]

[15]
何炬, 谌丽, 张文忠, 等. 城市更新背景下老旧小区改造的政府响应模式及其影响因素. 地理研究, 2025, 44(5): 1226-1244.

DOI

[He Ju, Chen Li, Zhang Wenzhong, et al. Government response model and its influencing factors for the renovation of old residential compounds in the context of urban renewal. Geographical Research, 2025, 44(5): 1226-1244.]

[16]
Cresswell T. Place: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014: 119-128.

[17]
张捷, 张宏磊, 唐文跃. 中国城镇书法景观空间分异及其地方意义: 以城镇商业街区为例. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12): 1675-1685.

[Zhang Jie, Zhang Honglei, Tang Wenyue. Spatial differentiation and place identity of Chinese calligraphic landscape. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(12): 1675-1685.]

DOI

[18]
段义孚. 恋地情结. 志丞, 刘苏, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2019: 139, 88-133.

[Duan Yifu. Topophilia. Zhi Cheng, Liu Su, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2019: 139, 88-133.]

[19]
段义孚. 空间与地方:经验的视角. 王志标译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2017: 110-132.

[Duan Yifu. Space and Place:The Perspective of Experience. Wang Zhibiao, trans. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2017: 110-132.]

[20]
朱竑, 钱俊希, 陈晓亮. 地方与认同: 欧美人文地理学对地方的再认识. 人文地理, 2010, 25(6): 1-6.

[Zhu Hong, Qian Junxi, Chen Xiaoliang. Place and identity: The rethink of place of European-American human geography. Human Geography, 2010, 25(6): 1-6.]

[21]
Williams D R, Roggenbuck J W. Measuring place attachment: Some preliminary results//NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research. San Antonio, Texas, USA, October 20-22, 1989.

[22]
戴旭俊, 刘爱利. 地方认同的内涵维度及影响因素研究进展. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(5): 662-674.

DOI

[Dai Xujun, Liu Aili. Progress of connotation, dimension, and influencing factors of place identity. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(5): 662-674.]

DOI

[23]
Escolà-Gascón Á, Dagnall N, Denovan A, et al. Evidence of environmental urban design parameters that increase and reduce sense of place in Barcelona (Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, 235: 104740.

DOI

[24]
吴蓉, 黄旭, 刘晔, 等. 广州城市居民地方依恋测度与机理. 地理学报, 2019, 74(2): 379-393.

DOI

[Wu Rong, Huang Xu, Liu Ye, et al. Place attachment of urbanites in Guangzhou: Measurement and mechanism. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(2): 379-393.]

DOI

[25]
Stedman R C. Is it really just a social construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources, 2003, 16(8): 671-685.

[26]
Chang J, Lin Z H, Vojnovic I, et al. Social environments still matter: The role of physical and social environments in place attachment in a transitional city, Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2023, 232: 104680.

[27]
Yang X D, Li H L. Community attachment in the context of urban settlement regeneration: Mediating role of resident interaction. Cities, 2023, 140: 104398.

DOI

[28]
李凡, 杨俭波, 何伟财. 快速城市化背景下佛山传统祠堂文化景观变化以及地方认同的建构. 人文地理, 2013, 28(6): 9-16.

[Li Fan, Yang Jianbo, He Weicai. Change of ancestral hall landscape in Foshan city and the construction of place-identity in the background of fast urbanization. Human Geography, 2013, 28(6): 9-16.]

[29]
Chan S H G, Lee W H H, Tang B M, et al. Legacy of culture heritage building revitalization: Place attachment and culture identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14: 1314223.

[30]
王雪, 青木信夫, 徐苏斌. 基于地方依恋反思旧城更新语境下的失所现象: 以天津西沽南拆除计划为例. 人文地理, 2019, 34(5): 44-52, 108.

[Wang Xue, AOKI Nobuo, Xu Subin. Reflection on displacement in the context of inner-city redevelopment from the perspective of place attachment: A case study of the demolition project of Xigunan, Tianjin. Human Geography, 2019, 34(5): 44-52, 108.]

[31]
楚晗, 谢涤湘, 常江. 地方发展变迁与居民地方感关系研究: 以广州荔枝湾涌历史文化街区为例. 人文地理, 2019, 34(4): 54-62, 72.

[Chu Han, Xie Dixiang, Chang Jiang. The relationship between place development and residents' sense of place: A case study of Lizhiwan historic district, Guangzhou. Human Geography, 2019, 34(4): 54-62, 72.]

[32]
林元城, 赖宏韬, 杨忍, 等. 城中村改造中的地方营造与情感机制: 以广州黄埔村创新创意空间为例. 热带地理, 2023, 43(2): 320-329.

DOI

[Lin Yuancheng, Lai Hongtao, Yang Ren, et al. Place-making and emotional mechanisms in the reconstruction of urban village: A case study of innovative and creative spaces in Huangpu Village, Guangzhou. Tropical Geography, 2023, 43(2): 320-329.]

DOI

[33]
陶伟, 陈慧灵, 蔡水清. 岭南传统民俗节庆重构对居民地方依恋的影响: 以广州珠村乞巧节为例. 地理学报, 2014, 69(4): 553-565.

DOI

[Tao Wei, Chen Huiling, Cai Shuiqing. Influence of Lingnan traditional folk festival reconstruction on residents' place attachment: A case study on Qiqiao Festival in Guangzhou Zhucun. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(4): 553-565.]

DOI

[34]
林林. 基于历史城区视角的历史文化名城保护“新常态”. 城市规划学刊, 2016(4): 94-101.

[Lin Lin. Conservation of historic and cultural cities in the context of the new normal: Perspective of historic urban area. Urban Planning Forum, 2016(4): 94-101.]

[35]
张松. 历史城区的整体性保护: 在“历史性城市景观”国际建议下的再思考. 北京规划建设, 2012(6): 27-30.

[Zhang Song. Holistic protection of historic urban areas: Rethinking under the international proposal of “historic urban landscape”. Beijing Planning Review, 2012(6): 27-30.]

[36]
常江, 谢涤湘, 陈宏胜, 等. 城市更新对居民社区依恋的影响: 基于广州新老社区的对比研究. 现代城市研究, 2019(9): 67-74, 96.

[Chang Jiang, Xie Dixiang, Chen Hongsheng, et al. The impacts of urban regeneration on residents' community attachment: A comparison between new and traditional communities in Guangzhou. Modern Urban Research, 2019(9): 67-74, 96.]

[37]
Dong G P, Zhang Z P, Zhang H, et al. Geographical match of objective and subjective measures of well-being at an intra-city scale. Applied Geography, 2024, 167: 103290.

DOI

[38]
董冠鹏, 张航, 郭雨臣. 基于空间计量模型的城市网络外部性定量测度. 地理研究, 2023, 42(2): 495-513.

DOI

[Dong Guanpeng, Zhang Hang, Guo Yuchen. Urban network externality modelled through spatial econometric models. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(2): 495-513.]

[39]
杜锦, 苗长虹, 许家伟, 等. 文旅融合背景下历史街区更新成效评估及提升路径研究: 以开封市三个历史街区为例. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(1): 164-180.

DOI

[Du Jin, Miao Changhong, Xu Jiawei, et al. Evaluation and enhancement of historic district regeneration effectiveness in the context of cultural-tourism integration: A case study of three historic districts in Kaifeng. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(1): 164-180.]

DOI

[40]
陈浩, 章颖, 赵璇. 探求历史社区人文复兴: 苏州古城双塔片区更新规划的试验性探索. 城市规划, 2022, 46(S1): 58-68.

[Chen Hao, Zhang Ying, Zhao Xuan. An experimental exploration on the humanistic rejuvenation of historic neighborhood: The renewal planning of Shuangta area in Suzhou old city. City Planning Review, 2022, 46(S1): 58-68.]

[41]
管永康, 薛义. 第三空间视域下历史街区的日常生活实践与地方依恋: 以天津市鼓楼街区为例. 地域研究与开发, 2023, 42(3): 92-97.

[Guan Yongkang, Xue Yi. Everyday life practices and place attachment in the historic districts under the perspective of third space: A case study of Tianjin Gulou district. Areal Research and Development, 2023, 42(3): 92-97.]

[42]
刘博, 朱竑, 袁振杰. 传统节庆在地方认同建构中的意义: 以广州“迎春花市” 为例. 地理研究, 2012, 31(12): 2197-2208.

[Liu Bo, Zhu Hong, Yuan Zhenjie. The significance of the traditional festival in the construction of place identity: A case study of the Winter Jasmine Flower Market in Guangzhou. Geographical Research, 2012, 31(12): 2197-2208.]

[43]
蔡天抒, 袁奇峰. 以“地方文化认同” 为动力的历史文化遗产保护: 基于广东地方文化保育行动的实证研究. 国际城市规划, 2017, 32(2): 114-120.

[Cai Tianshu, Yuan Qifeng. Historical and cultural heritage protection with “local cultural identity” as the motivation: Empirical study of local cultural preservation action in Guangdong. Urban Planning International, 2017, 32(2): 114-120.]

DOI

[44]
高元, 王树声, 张琳捷. 城市文化空间及其规划研究进展与展望. 城市规划学刊, 2019(6): 43-49.

[Gao Yuan, Wang Shusheng, Zhang Linjie. Review on progress and prospect of urban cultural space and cultural planning. Urban Planning Forum, 2019(6): 43-49.]

[45]
杨钦然, 蒋希冀, 杨林川. 社区更新的健康效应的国际研究综述: 概念反思、理论认知与体系架构. 自然资源学报, 2025, 40(1): 74-90.

DOI

[Yang Qinran, Jiang Xiji, Yang Linchuan. Review of the health effects of neighborhood renewal: Conceptual reflection, theoretical cognition and system construction. Journal of Natural Resources, 2025, 40(1): 74-90.]

DOI

[46]
Boley B B, Strzelecka M, Yeager E P, et al. Measuring place attachment with the abbreviated place attachment scale (APAS). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2021, 74: 101577.

DOI

[47]
杨飞龙, 谌丽, 刘倩倩, 等. 健身运动场所可达性及其对居民满意度影响的年龄分层研究: 以北京城区为例. 地理科学进展, 2024, 43(7): 1416-1428.

DOI

[Yang Feilong, Chen Li, Liu Qianqian, et al. An age-stratified study on the accessibility to sports venues and their impact on resident satisfaction: Evidence from urban Beijing. Progress in Geography, 2024, 43(7): 1416-1428.]

DOI

[48]
朱竑, 刘博. 地方感、地方依恋与地方认同等概念的辨析及研究启示. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011(1): 1-8.

[Zhu Hong, Liu Bo. Concepts analysis and research implications: Sense of place, place attachment and place identity. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2011(1): 1-8.]

[49]
肖潇, 张捷, 卢俊宇, 等. 基于ITCM的旅游者地方依恋价值评估: 以九寨沟风景区为例. 地理研究, 2013, 32(3): 570-579.

[Xiao Xiao, Zhang Jie, Lu Junyu, et al. Assessing recreational value of place attachment based on ITCM: A case study in Jiuzhaigou Scenic Area. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(3): 570-579.]

[50]
王凯. 新时期城乡历史文化保护传承体系构建探索. 城市规划, 2022, 46(S2): 6-13.

[Wang Kai. An exploration on the construction of urban and rural historic and cultural protection and inheritance system in the new era. City Planning Review, 2022, 46(S2): 6-13.]

[51]
肖竞, 张芮珠, 吕思维, 等. 基于价值当量综合测度的城市遗产资源统筹保护研究. 城市发展研究, 2023, 30(8): 1-9.

[Xiao Jing, Zhang Ruizhu, Lyu Siwei, et al. Urban heritage resources coordinating preservation study based on the comprehensive measurement of value equivalents. Urban Development Studies, 2023, 30(8): 1-9.]

[52]
Dong G P, Harris R. Spatial autoregressive models for geographically hierarchical data structures. Geographical Analysis, 2015, 47(2): 173-191.

DOI

[53]
阮仪三, 孙萌. 我国历史街区保护与规划的若干问题研究. 城市规划, 2001, 25(10): 25-32.

[Ruan Yisan, Sun Meng. The study on some issues related to the conservation and planning for the historic streets and areas in China. City Planning Review, 2001, 25(10): 25-32.]

[54]
汪芳, 李薇, PROMINSKI Martin. 城镇化和地方性的新冲突、新策略与新探索: 中德双边研讨会会议综述. 地理研究, 2014, 33(11): 2205-2214.

[Wang Fang, Li Wei, Martin P. The new conflicts, strategies and explorations of urbanization and locality: Overview on the Sino-German symposium. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(11): 2205-2214.]

Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉